Login or register to rate or review Forever and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

Forever (1995)
by Alfred Sung

  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer: Dragoco
  • Bottle Designer: Pierre Dinand

Forever Fragrance Notes

Reviews of Forever

Showing 6 out of a total of 7 reviews

Show: 5 positive | 1 neutral | 1 negative


Add your review of Forever


2 reviews

A mixture of "Three Flower" pomade, orange oil, and lightly scented Raid. Your better off buying dollar-store perfume.
07 April 2009


18 reviews

Found a sample vial of "Forever" in my Jewelry box. Amazing what you find when you look.

The opening smells crisp. tart and very green - so the color of the juice is appropriate - with an earthy spicyness in it. I can a lot of florals, a faint bit of plum and don't know what "tayberry" is, but I'm going to assume it's the tarty thing I'm smelling - unless that the mixture of sandalwood and muget. I'm going to also assume that "damask" rose means "rose-scented linens" or something like that, because it's not a pure rose - the scent is a lot "fresher" and reminds of a clean house. The Freesia scent is very very strong, and I've never been much of a freesia fan - so unless it fades into the other scents, that could kill it for me.

About 20 minutes in I can smell the perfume mellowing - the freesia isn't as strong but I've decided that the bitterness must be coming in part from the muget - and I don't like it much.

I'm giving this a "neutral" because the scent is pretty but it's too bitter/tart/sour for me but I'm going to attribute that to chemistry and taste. Fans of Freesia and Narcissus should definitely give it a whirl.
18 January 2009


48 reviews

This is a lovely light floral, spring or summer scent. Great for when you don't want to offend or stand out too much or when it's way too humid for a stronger frag. On my skin, I can definitely smell the freesia, narcisse and rose; the sandalwood, muget and amber are very faint, even at the beginning. Lasting power is at about 6 hours as can be expected for a typical EDT. I toss my bottle into my purse, for refreshing later. The price is not bad, since you can find this at some discount stores for under $20, per 1.7oz bottle.
05 December 2008


1 reviews

I bought this right away when I sniffed it in a Macy's many moons ago, during my second ever visit to NYC. It is fresh, sparkling, effervescent, soapy, and romantic with a delicious soft, powdery musk drydown - definitely feminine but different from the Eau de Britneys and Escada limited editions saturating the market. I see it as primarily a summer scent, to be worn with a short flirty skirt or dress. Quite underrated, I think!
25 November 2008


1 reviews

I love this perfume. I've been wearing it since the 90's and still adore it. It's very light and floral. Yummy.
20 December 2007


13 reviews

I'm not sure if this one has been discontinued, but I can't find it anymore. I discovered it in the mid or late 90's in a magazine fragrance ad. When I smelled it, I got aroused and had to buy some. It is indeed very light and sheer and casual. The part that turned me on was a musky warm aftersmell which I can't quite describe.
05 February 2007

Show all 7 Forever reviews

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Forever products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Forever by Alfred Sung that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Forever by Alfred Sung from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2009 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom