
Balmain Jolie Madame Shootout
Left Arm: Vintage Balmain Jolie Madame
Right Arm: Balmain Jolie Madame
Jolie Madame Notes: gardenia, artemisia, bergamot, coriander, neroli, jasmine, tuberose, rose, jonquil, orris, patchouli, oakmoss, vetiver, musk, castoreum, leather, civet (from Bois de Jasmine)
First thought in my mind--these two do not smell like the same fragrance AT ALL. The vintage juice is fruity, peachy, a little boozy, sweet with a burned sugar note. The modern juice (I am assuming it is modern, so I may stand corrected on this) starts dry, powdery, tart. It also has some boozy fruit underneath, and a hint of sharp white floral. I have tested 2 vintage fragrances today, and both had the burnt sugar top note. Now I am wondering if that is an ingredient that oxidized or changed over the years. I can't say it is unpleasant, but I am not sure it is necessarily congruent with the rest of the fragrance. I will have to ponder this one, especially as I try more vintage juice in the future.
Development...the burned sugar note remains in the vintage, but it is becoming a bit more dry and powdery--a dry oakmoss chypre and light leather note. The modern is still powdery--at this stage, it is a different kind of powder, and I suspect this one could be "oakmoss free" because it does not have the same mossy smell to it. It is also possible that the quality of the oakmoss is different, or it is attenuated by the other ingredients. The light leather is also present in the modern one, and the powder note is dry and pleasant. The vintage is more sour-dry, the modern is more acidic-dry.
These two are fairly well matched at the dry chypre powder stage. The differences are so subtle--seems that the modern reformulation is rather good. But, but, but, there is just something about oakmoss. I love it. The oakmoss in the vintage seems just a tad more friendly, a bit less bitter. Of course, it could be the vetiver which adds bitterness to the modern frag. I just love how the vintage one is softer and more plush, with a small amount of sweetness to balance the dryness. In contrast, the modern formula seems very cold and a lot more green. Still, the character seems roughly the same for both vintage and modern. No matter what, Jolie Madame is an amazing chypre, and to me it really doesn't smell dated at all (1953 is the original release date according to the directory).
Afterthoughts on the late, late drydown...I definitely think the modern formulation drydown is more dry, woody, bitter and smoky due to the vetiver. The vintage juice dries sweeter and fruity, almost like a light liquor infused with powdery orris and a hint of oakmoss.