Login or
register to rate or review Artemisia and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
| - Availability: In Production
- Perfumer:
- Bottle Designer:
|
|
Reviews of Artemisia
Showing 6 out of a total of 11 reviews
Show: 7 positive | 4 neutral | negative
Add your review of Artemisia
 229 reviews
|  A slight, moderately entertaining fragrance that fades quickly from the memory. There is little to criticize other than its brevity, but it lacks the sure-footed conviction required to make its mark. With its subtlety, it might be well suited to warmer climes, but why wear it at all. A decidely average fragrance that dribbles away all too rapidly 04 July 2009 |
 2208 reviews
|  Yes, I found this one to be a dull floral as well. Like L’Artisan, Penhaligon's stated concentrations should be taken with a pinch of salt… [Original submission date: 01 March 2009] 26 June 2009 |
 9 reviews
|  This smells a lot like Cashmere Mist. I owned and finished a bottle of CM, and every once in a while I long to have another bottle. I've recently finished a sample of Artemisia, and found it so similar, but more refined than CM. CM sometimes became cloying on me, and I think that would not happen with Artemisia. I do like Artemisia and would probably wear it frequently. But Artemisia is more expensive, and I haven't decided if it's worth it to me. I do like Artemisia's bottle better. 13 June 2009 |
 62 reviews
|  This is one of my favorite Penhaligon's scents. Although it contains 11 listed ingredients, the result is a very pleasant dry reedy scent underlined with vanilla and a hint of amber. It is wonderful as a summer scent and its soap, talc and lotion embodiments have a permanent home for summer use. Highly recommended. Top Notes: Nectarine; Green Foliage Middle Notes: Green Apple; Lily of the Valley; Jasmine Tea; Violet; Vanilla Base Notes: Oakmoss; Sandalwood; Musk; Amber; Vanilla 21 January 2009 |
 36 reviews
|  This is very light after the first blast - literally 'barely there' - but it is pretty. It develops into a soft, powdery, gentle, slightly oriental fragrance which lasts much longer than I expected it too. Lovely if you don't like overpowering perfumes or don't want to annoy anyone, but you do need to apply quite a lot if you want to notice it at all (unless that is just my bottle or my nose!) 13 December 2008 |
 3258 reviews
|  Very light, fruity floral opening… delicate and subtle: This is such a transparent floral accord in the opening and the heart notes that I can’t determine the individual flowers: What I experience is a softened mixed floral – the olfactory version of an impressionistic garden landscape. I can tell that the carrying agent is tea… Penhaligon says there is jasmine tea. The base is a vanilla / musk with soft spices that responds beautifully on my skin… I don’t get any sandalwood in the base. Aartemesia is not noticeably sweet to my nose: I think its sweetness is perfectly balanced with the floral and tea elements. Of course, a fragrance as ethereal as this has limited sillage and I wouldn’t have it any other way. For the type of fragrance it is, it seems to have better longevity than expected. 22 November 2008 |
Show all 11 Artemisia reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Artemisia products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Artemisia by Penhaligon's that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Artemisia by Penhaligon's from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes