
Citrus baby powder. That's it...the only way I can describe it.
****EDIT 07/11/2009**** I would like to profusely recant the review above. I tested No. 19 in the most hurried, and for the most part without serious contemplation and thought. The review above was all about initial impressions and nothing really about the whole composition in itself, because as I've discovered recently, there are beautiful and notable facets to this scent.
I wanted to review all three with some substance to them, but unfortunately, my review on the EdP will be rather thin and from vague memory.
EdT: This was where my initial impression came from. Smelling its topnotes in the air and catching citrus-green astringent and powdery notes. Many are put off by Chanel's recent reformulation, I'm not sure if it was another reformulation when the color went from a hunter green to an almost fluorescent green. I am reviewing the fluorescent green one here. The galbanum makes so much of an impression in the beginning, leafy and stemmy--crisp notes that give the impression of a spring morning after the rain.
As the green notes fade, there is a slight warmth of rose which is quickly replaced by bright, high pitched notes of muguet and ylang-ylang sweetened slightly by jasmine. Mossy notes start to appear, supported by green notes of vetiver.
As we head towards the drydown, the clearest note of leather appears, cold but sweet if you can understand what I mean--nothing animalic about it if this is a way to put it.
Finally, a trail of clean but sensual musk appears to end the experience. I was thoroughly entertained by this experience. Not many seem to enjoy this incarnation, but I think it is certainly one of the greatest perfume artistry in terms of its evolution and expression. The gents can certainly wear this because of its barely gender identified composition. One could easily mistake this as an EdC, very abstract enough, and you could describe this incarnation as niche quality. Some say that it is ahead of its time, but really, I don't think the older formulation smelled this way. Those who have followed No. 19 since 1971 please comment.
EDP: As I said, this isn't from vague memory. The EdP, as I remember is much more assertive. In a way, it smells classy, but bitchy. She knows what she wants, and is a bit audacious. The transitions if I remember are not smooth. The notes announce themselves then recede into the background from one phase to the next. Overall it is deeper, much like the parfum, but I think it has a more powdery edge to it compared to the parfum, but definitely louder. I wish I could say more about the base, but I had stopped paying attention to the fragrance when I tested it. Smelling this version lets you understand what the next step would be in Chanel's perfumes--the creation of Cristalle, the freebird sister.
PARFUM: The parfum is the true expression of the fragrance. Neither too assertive or too clean, it is a subdued fragrance that is personal, the homage to Coco Chanel's own personal scent.
This review is for a vintage edition imported from France, before the color of the juice was made a faint green. It begins with its classic citrus green notes, but with a very warm but transient notes of hyacinth and aldehydes. A definite note of rose appears, soon joined by bright notes of muguet and ylang-ylang. Powdery notes of orris and narcissus are there, but do not try to take over the rose that sits perfectly at the center.
As the drydown appears, the vetiver is very apparent. Leather appears, but much warmer than the EdT. There is a slight trace of familiarity with Cuir de Russie's composition, but isn't as animalic. The final notes appear as sandalwood on me. I can't detect the musk at all.
Overall, this version is quiet and contemplative with a streak of sophistication and romanticism. Much like how I would imagine Mlle. Chanel would be. There is also a hint of melancholy, a hint of the unfulfilled, the desire to do much more--ambition that hasn't found completion. You also can feel the nostalgia, a mark of everything that comes right up to this point in this fashion house. On a personal and deep level, I too can identify with these notions.
I think the EdT should be a quintessential scent to be worn in the spring and summer. Its leathery nuances make it great for a dash of sophistication at the office and for intimate evening formals.
The parfum is great for romantic moods or for contemplation without wearing something overbearing but always in the background. It can be worn for all seasons. All three however, express such a different facet in a person they would like to bring to light. Choose one version to express who you are!