Shop for Love's Baby Soft
 |
|
All Stockists
Other fragrances by Love's
Other fragrances launched in 1974
Fragrance Profile
Reviews of Love's Baby Soft (1974)
by Love's
- Availability: In Production
- Perfumer:
- Bottle Designer:
main page
member reviews
community search
submit informationView the main Love's Baby Soft page.
Neutral Reviews of Love's Baby Soft
Showing all 2 Neutral reviews
Show all of the Love's Baby Soft reviews
Add your review of Love's Baby Soft
  |  Okay, first, the other Love versions stank. The original is the best, even though it smells a bit phony like to me. It's soft and dries to a powder, like baby powder! Duh! Wow! I mean, really, I'd just rather go out and purchase the lotion and powder instead! Nothing exciting here. But, good for the little girls and preteens. 21 April 2008 |
|
| As inexpensive and pretty as it is, I see why it used to be so popular among the teenaged girls in the USA: sweet cotton candy with a touch of strawberries and weighless musk. It does not last long at all, but what a sweet half hour it is when one is going to sleep in a sheer veil of Love's Baby Soft! 28 December 2007 |
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Love's Baby Soft products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Love's Baby Soft by Love's that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Love's Baby Soft by Love's from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
Report an Error
Twitter
Facebook
MySpace
Last.fm
All Editorial
