Login or register to rate or review Amarige and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

Amarige (1991)
by Givenchy

  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer: Dominique Ropion
  • Bottle Designer: Serge Mansau

Reviews of Amarige

Showing 6 out of a total of 29 reviews

Show: 15 positive | 6 neutral | 8 negative


Add your review of Amarige


50 reviews

According to the little blurb on the back of the Amarige tester strip ,it says Amarige is composed of gardenia, mimosa and musk but from previous reviews I see there is more to it than that.
This is a 80s style heavy hitting sweet floral perfume mainly of tuberose and gardenia when smelt.
I love this perfume for it's longevity and it's uniqueness. I have to be in the'mood' to wear this as it lingers and lingers .
Beautifully done fragrance.
Dominique Ropion- a master ! Serge Mansau - wonderful bottle /glass designer- who can ask for more ? I adore all Mansau's bottle designs!
02 November 2009


2201 reviews

Fifteen years before composing the transcendently beautiful tuberose soliflore Carnal Flower for Frédéric Malle, Dominique Ropion gave us Amarige. Could two essays on the same flower, by the same perfumer, be any more opposed in style, mood, and attitude than Amarige and Carnal Flower? You tell me.

Eucalyptus, coconut, and sandalwood render Carnal Flower green, crisp, and ethereal, in spite of its considerable potency. Fruits (currants among them,) powerfully sweet lactones, and heavy synthetic musks lend Amarige the olfactory tone and volume of a bugle call and side drum tattoo. If Carnal Flower is candlelight, Amarige is a Klieg light. Carnal Flower is voluptuous, while Amarige is raucous.

Amarige aims to out-Fracas Fracas, and for the most part it succeeds. Your response to it will depend on how you feel about that aim. Its manner holds no appeal for me, but I can’t fault it for that. On the other hand, I can’t exactly recommend it either, since you’re as likely to hate it as to love it. I’m left in the awkward position of giving Amarige a neutral rating, though “neutral” seems an odd term when applied to so bold, distinctive, and divisive a fragrance!

03 October 2009


34 reviews

Sweet, strong, sexy, mature scent. I agree with the comment that it has a unique leathery aspect to it. I like it, not one of my favorite, but my husband loves it on me.
15 July 2009


131 reviews

Tuberose's reputation has been damaged almost irrepairably by this most horrid affair. If I were her I would sue.
01 June 2009


1 reviews

After searching high and low for 19 years, i finally stumbled across the perfect perfume for me.
It wasn't too spicy, or too floral, just the right combination.
It didn't turn sour on me, and the lingering scent was beautiful.

Truly suits my chemistry... one I think you have to wear for a week to decide if you like it.
29 April 2009


7 reviews

Horrible, HORRIBLE soapy smell broadcasting out to the planet at gigawatt levels. I made the mistake of spraying this onto my wrist and I thought I'd never be able to remove it. This smell made me feel nauseous and headachey too so it's a real keeper. Why can't scents I love possess this extraordinary potency?
25 January 2009

Show all 29 Amarige reviews

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Amarige products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Amarige by Givenchy that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Amarige by Givenchy from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2009 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom