1903
|
|
Reviews of 1903 ![]() hunter87597 Show all reviews | I will just get to the point. This is a very smoky, rich and leathery cologne with true staying power. It's rare, which is what I love about it even more. Gets compliments every time. A real winner cologne. In my top 3. 19th December, 2011. |
| odysseusm CanadaShow all reviews | Here's another appreciative review of this retro marvel. The opening notes have crisp citrus and dusky green aspects which remind me very much of Truefitt & Hill's Grafton. A fair bit of peppery spice keeps a warm touch to balance the cool notes. These cool ones may be from the frankincense, certainly they have a coniferous, mountain-air quality. Gradually the old-school notes of leather, moss, smoke and tobacco appear. These are restrained, classy, and very very similar to Gucci Nobile. This is a well-made scent in a warm, masculine style. 7th December, 2011. |
| Redbeard United StatesShow all reviews | Is it really the replacement for Dunhill Edition? The opening is a very sweet but surprisingly organic wood with sharp spices. It has some of the soapiness of DE, but because the spices aren't as smooth, the soap connection is weaker. The leafy, live character of the wood reminds me of that aspect of Burberry London, even though they aren't too similar beyond that. Later on, it starts to resemble potpourri a bit more as the spices mellow out and lose astringence. Perhaps some of this is also from an apple cider note, as if taken from Michael Kors? For the most part, I'm intrigued by how this brew splits the difference between the stronger, dryer 80s wood scents and the exotic but very sweet spice scents that I find so fascinating (Eau Lente, Maharadjah, Tea for Two?). Still, the base has a cold, waxy, concrete grayness (violet, I suspect, as in Narciso Rodriguez) that makes it all a bit impenetrable and stubborn, and slightly dated. Overall, definitely worth a try, though I'm not using it to replace my Dunhill Edition. 26th June, 2011. |
| Sunsetspawn United StatesShow all reviews | I honestly swore this wasn't much more than a clean and peppery musk. If the pyramid is to be believed, there's a light green and citrus on top that I guess contributes to the clean feel, but I don't see any pepper, or musk for that matter. To be fair, during today's wearing I was having a harder time smelling the musk, and the whole composition felt more herbal and tobacco-y. It's a well blended enigma that may take a dozen or so wearings to fully understand. Unfortunately, my decant is almost out and it didn't really speak to me enough for me to get more. 2nd February, 2011. |
| MysteryBuff40 United StatesShow all reviews | Top notes: Clean citrus, bergamot, green notes 13rd December, 2009. (Last Edited: 4th October, 2011.) |
![]() SirSlarty United StatesShow all reviews | A great scent for the gentleman. Slightly powdery but smokey. Fantastic drydown of very masculine bases: tobacco, woods, leather. With the notes listed above, the elemi comes across reminiscent of Oscar for Men (2000), very strong yet lightly minty woods. Great all around cologne. 2nd October, 2009. |
Latest 1903 Threads|
| Anyone Try 1903 By J. Peterman? started by Dudester! |
|
| J. Peterman 1903 started by Spicemeister |
|
| D'Orsay Le Dandy vs J Peterman 1903 started by Ricardo |
MysteryBuff40
wore this 1 day ago