Dunhill d (1996)
by Dunhill

duh... nhill I don't get this one. Not bad, but very generic. I smell the rosewood and mandarain orange, & a hint of cypress in top notes, but can't pick out the jasmine. Fades so quickly, I can't quite make out the heart or base notes, even after multiple applications, with my nose next to my skin. Given to me probably 12 years ago; wouldn't have bought it for myself.

6th June, 2011.

A fresh, woody fragrance that doesn't last any longer than Jell-O nailed to a wall.

11th September, 2008.

A fruity woody and not unpleasant whiff but no lasting power Inoffensive and very average

5th July, 2008.

The name Dunhill evokes a class of its own. I suppose that's why the dropped the "unhill" from the name of this fragrance. It is not to be seen on the bottle, just that lonely amputated "d" and the menetekel "Scannon SA" promintently printed on the back.
No sooner have you sprayed it on, do you forget this manifestation of mediocrity, which would serve the house of Calvin Klein well. I expect the next release in Alfred's name will be Duh?hill.

15th August, 2006.

Smells ok, but last about 10 minutes. Ending up giving it to my 6 year old son. He is the best smelling kindergartner there is(for 10 min)

4th August, 2005.

Nothing to do cartwheels and canon- balls over. Just a pleasantly fresh fragrance with wood notes. O.K. but far from extraordinary. I strongly suspect that Edition is far superior as is the original Dunhill for Men.

24th April, 2003.