Login or
register to rate or review Greenergy and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
| - Availability: In Production
- Perfumer:
- Bottle Designer:
|
|
Basenotes says...
A Smooth Mossy Chypre style fragrance and it shares a similar bottle to Insensé and Insensé Ultramarine. The fragrance was developed for the Asian Duty Free market. The fragrance starts off very bright and green (that freshly cut grass type smell) and ends up with a subtle mossy scent.
Reviews of Greenergy
Showing 6 out of a total of 9 reviews
Show: 6 positive | 3 neutral | negative
Add your review of Greenergy
 3385 reviews
|  SImple. Clear. Green. Understand it MEANT to be light and fresh and it does its job well. Green top and mossy base but not extremely mossy. Just plain ol' clean green. Fond of it but not in love. 05 November 2009 |
 8 reviews
|  To Greenergy fans who find this stuff hard to find, as of June 16, 2007, there were 50 x 50ml bottles of this stuff available on Ebay under the seller: universityfragrances at a great price too. Cost me 32.00 Canadian including shipping, so it will be even cheaper for Americans with the currency conversion and cheaper shipping fees. I just bought me a bottle. There are other people selling it for twice that much saying it is discontinued and rare, but it says at the top of this page it is still in production. I've never tried it before, but I know I will like it, so I give it a thumbs up already. 17 June 2007 |
 15 reviews
|  Very pleasant green chypre - I got this very cheaply in a taxfree shop. Although it's supposed to be for men it worked very well for me as a refreshing vetiver scent for the summer. 30 May 2007 |
 486 reviews
|  Greenergy fragrance notes include: lemon, tarragon, vetiver, oakmoss. Like others, I am always interested in well-made green scents. Greenergy is exactly that sort of fragrance. It has a cheerful, crisp opening, with a bit of lemon. Green notes appear, first from tarragon and then vetiver. They combine to project a freshly-cut grass smell that is not floral but is dry and quite pleasing. The lemon/grass combo makes this a chypre. Moss stays in the background and mellows things out a bit. I’d classify this as a clean, effortless vetiver-based chypre, an easy introduction to the type. I will register disagreement with the good Baron (below): having tried Paul Smith for Men, I prefer Greenergy. While the two scents are similar, I find PSfM to be too sweet and floral for my taste. This is a good daytime and spring/summer scent. 16 May 2007 |
 30 reviews
|  Having tried the ultra-feminine Insense and the extremely mediocre Givenchy Pour Homme, I had little hope for this Givenchy which sure looked like a knockoff of Insense. I was sure surprised. This stuff is great. It's a wonderful Green fragrance that exemplifies chypres. It even has a somewhat calming effect on me when I smell it. Great spring, summer scent for those who wouldn't mind a little more green everywhere. 19 December 2006 |
 14 reviews
|  An outstanding Green fragrance. Very long lasting. Pretty quick drydown then settles in to a classy warm scent. In my top ten for sure. Seems to be a little hard to find. 10 December 2006 |
Show all 9 Greenergy reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Greenergy products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Greenergy by Givenchy that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Greenergy by Givenchy from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes