Login or
register to rate or review Grey Flannel and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
Basenotes says...
FIFI award winner in 1976
Grey Flannel Fragrance Notes
Reviews of Grey Flannel
Showing 6 out of a total of 49 reviews
Show: 37 positive | 7 neutral | 5 negative
Add your review of Grey Flannel
 61 reviews
|  Very clean from the opening. I've grown fond of the violet. This is a classic frag that is great to have around in your wardrobe. It smells like nothing else I have, even if it's a bit minimalistic in structure. It doesn't smell sparse however.....almost"amplified" if you will. From beginning to end, a classic scent that can be had at a great price. 06 September 2008 |
 202 reviews
|  It's a classic alright. I loved smelling it on others when I was a kid, but it's not something I reach for very often as an adult. It's well constructed and quite green with a great big violet leaf blow in the face. Once it settles down into a bit of wood, it still keeps a lot of the green alive and turns rather linear. I like it, but I don't really want to smell like it. I appreciate it and would hate to see it discontinued after all these years. 18 August 2008 |
 2 reviews
|  With that powdery, yet citrussy drydown, it´s hard for me to think of this as the classic "suit scent". This is one of the older colognes, that will make the people around you aware of the fact that you´re wearing one (cologne, that is). It definitely changes its character throughout the first hour or so, to become a distinct, somehow aristrocatic smell. It´s dandyish, and if that´s what you´re looking for, this the best you can get for your money. Forget about the fact that it´s old - old can be classy. 31 July 2008 |
 266 reviews
|  No, I don't hate it, but it's too suburbia prom night rented tuxedo retro 70's. Some like it out of nostalgia, others because they can't find a citrus with longevity and some plain like it. I'm not one of them, much too overbearing a juice, If you want a violet rush that's dignified and distinct, try Joseph Abboud. GF is too high a price to pay for longevity. Pass. 18 July 2008 |
 10 reviews
|  A stunning green/spicy chypre that highlights an incredible galbanum/violet/sage combination drying down to a beautiful woody/rooty base of cedar/oakmoss/vetiver. Excellent sillage! This scent is so distinct, you won't mistake it for anything else. Ideally suited for fall/winter. This is a classic and worth a try. 11 July 2008 |
 829 reviews
|  Grey Flannel opens with a barrage of very dry, bitter herbal notes, supplemented by what smells to me like a very heavy dose of violet leaf. Over time a slightly sweeter mown grass accord enters to underpin the brusque top notes, but Grey Flannel remains a stark and craggy scent. Grey Flannel eventually matures into a blunt vetiver on a mossy cedar base, from which point it remains resolutely linear before fading away. Grey Flannel is clearly a product of that same decade that brought us the more trenchant and confrontational Yatagan, and I’m glad it’s survived for all these years. It makes a fine antidote to the host of faceless clean men’s fragrances that dominate today’s designer market. 26 June 2008 |
Show all 49 Grey Flannel reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Grey Flannel products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Grey Flannel by Geoffrey Beene that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Grey Flannel by Geoffrey Beene from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes