Login or register to rate or review Happy for Men and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

Happy for Men (1999)
by Clinique

Image Credit: Basenotes
  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:

Basenotes says...

This fragrance stays fresh, clean and light throughout. Ideal for the summer. Very orangey too!

Happy for Men Fragrance Notes

Reviews of Happy for Men

Showing 6 out of a total of 53 reviews

Show: 34 positive | 15 neutral | 4 negative


Add your review of Happy for Men


114 reviews

I really like the opening, which smells like freshly squeezed oranges. It's quite nice.

However I didn't like the dry-down. The fresh orange becomes subdued and the fragrance takes on more of a musky scent. It still smells decent at this point, but not nearly as good as the opening.

The base reminds me of Versace Man Eau Fraīche, except Versace has a strong starfruit note and is more "perfumey," whereas Happy is more musky.

I prefer Versace Man Eau Fraīche to this.
30 August 2008


53 reviews

This is is 1 of those scents to hope all the best for only to get it & be dissapointed. While this is a nice citurs frag for the summer. It lacks silage & longevtiy! Thats the biggest down fall of HAPPY! & when there is poor silage & longevity there is really nothing to be happy about.
26 August 2008


30 reviews

Excellent concept, nice name, excellent package, good colors.
Well, now the fragance....Happy is not a bad cologne, but a little bit generic and boring.
Clean, but without style.
Longevity is not the best and sillage is very bad.
Maybe a good option for people who feels depressed. Nothing more.
07 August 2008


1979 reviews

Fresh, light, amazing green orange citrus scent well made for summer. Simple and clean. Great!
25 July 2008


33 reviews

I swear I get the green middle right at the opening with the orange which slowly fades into a one trick orange pony. It's a damn good trick, but I just don't get much else out of this one. Yes, you'll probably enjoy it. Yes, the people around you will probably enjoy it. Yes, I enjoy it immensely. There just isn't much here though.

Still, that one trick is so good that if it weren't for it's awful longevity, it would've gotten a thumbs up from me. I suppose you could around a little decant of it if you really like it...
24 July 2008


56 reviews

I find both the male and female versions to be extremely synthetic, with the latter twice as much so. But weirdly, it seems to work well, as find both very appealing. Happy for men does not smell natural at all(the female version smells of cosmetics, how ironic with clinique iconised by its cosmetic accolades), tho it is obvious that the scent is pivoted on fruit notes. It is definitely a breath of fresh air from a very vast generic pool of freshies. It somehow escapes from smelling tacky, which alot of citrus-gone-plastic scents are guilty of. I find myself weirdly attracted to HFM, and i liken this to artificial sweeterner - when too much becomes bitter. Quite the attention grabber, this "bitter-sweet symphony". the poly-smelling juice and its bright in your face bottle gets a rare thumbs up for its effort to steer away from smelling safe.
13 July 2008

Show all 53 Happy for Men reviews

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Happy for Men products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Happy for Men by Clinique that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Happy for Men by Clinique from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2008 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom