Lauder for Men (1985)
|
|
$62.19 100ml Cologne | $58.63 100ml Cologne | $57.00 100ml Cologne |
Reviews of Lauder for Men| jtd United StatesShow all reviews | A typically smart and category-merging fragrance from Lauder. 19th August, 2011. (Last Edited: 25th August, 2011.) |
| suburbanites United StatesShow all reviews | This was among my favorite 80's fragrances, and one I recently rediscovered. 17th August, 2011. |
![]() alfarom ItalyShow all reviews | Lauder Fer Men sits somewhere between a spicy fougere and a citric chypre. At a first sniff it could be easily dismissed as its classic structure may brings to mind of many fragrances of the same genre/period, but if you go deeper you'll discover an outstanding composition that, through the usual chrisms of the 80's powerhose style, is able to create its own language made of floral patterns, green notes and slight animalic nuances. An overall aromatic aspect is clearly reamrkable throughout the fragrance evolution and reaches the top of its relevance when the green tobacco note starts to play. 5th August, 2011. (Last Edited: 9th August, 2011.) |
![]() shamu1 United StatesShow all reviews | Lauder For Men is definitely not for everybody. It is so far from today's fragrance trends, I'm surprised that Estee Lauder even still makes this. It's a very powerful citrus chypre in the "old lady" style of chypre classics like Boucheron Pour Homme, Givenchy III, Scherrer, and Aramis 900. Well, if Lauder For Men is an old lady's fragrance, you can call me Grammy, because I think this is awesome. 17th May, 2011. |
| robyogi United StatesShow all reviews | A well-behaved powerhouse. This is complex and refined. Lots of notes - florals, spices, moss, leather, incense - vie for attention, leading to something akin to a VC&A PH "light" effect. This is not as flowery or leathery as VC&A's PH; not as loud or muscular as Trussardi's Uomo; more "conservative" and formal than Oscar's Pour Lui; not as skanky as YSL's Kouros; not as leathery-green-sweaty as Dior's Jules...it sort of sits in the middle of the spectrum of 80s powerhouses. It's great stuff, but usually when I'm reaching for a powerhouse I'm looking for a particular effect or mood and Lauder doesn't fulfill that need for me. It's almost clinical in its refinement - the scent of a bureaucrat or company man. I could see accountants and finance people in the 80s wearing this as a signature scent. 23rd April, 2011. |
| colormechris United StatesShow all reviews | Just tried it today. A flawless shiny thing. Perfect balance of greens, some florals and spices. Dries down to a pleasant leathery whisper, like walking through a high end mens shoe store. Perhaps this fellow is too smooth though. There's nothing here that really sets him apart. He's anonymous, like a spy or an assassin. Maybe that's why nobody seems to know about him. But he gets the job done though, doesn't he? Has that classy Lauder vibe, kind of the American Mlle Chanel. My only gripe about Lauder is the packaging. It often doesn't do justice to what's within; downright cheap sometimes. But maybe they pass on the savings to us! 30th March, 2011. |
Latest Lauder for Men Threads|
| Lauder for men(1985)-is it a safe blind buy?? started by wirral guy |
|
| So I finally got Lauder for Men.....can't figure it out yet........casual or more formal? started by odioustoilet |
|
| Lauder For Men - any difference between vintage and current? started by noggs |
|
| Lauder for Men started by scentimus |
|
| Lauder for Men - Why can't I smell it? started by Frip |
|
| Question about Lauder for men started by AromiErotici |
|
| Lauder for Men - Strength over Pleasure(s) started by manicboy |
|
| Lauder For Men started by PeterV |
|
| Lauder for men started by kevmcr |
|
| Lauder for Men started by MisterK |
sergelutêncio
wore this 3 days ago