Passion for Men (1989)
by Elizabeth Taylor

This could be a guilty pleasure. A softer Azzaro with a touch of Jaipur. Not bad. Not bad at all. Three stars and an air kiss for Liz.

I DON`T UNDRSTAND WHY BAD TGHINGS ARE SAID ABOUT THIS EXCEPCIONAL FRAGRANCE! I LIKE IT VERY, VERY NUCH INDEED! I`M SORRY IT`S DISCONTINUED AND WORSE MRS TAYLOR IS NOT SO WELL, VERY SORRY!
THIS PERFUME IS MISTERIOUS, FRESH, SWEET AND UNIQUE!
HORACIO

An ancient composition of woods and oriental accords. Powerful and unexpected men's fragrance from Ms. Taylor.

way too average. way too cheap smelling, way too synthetic. do not buy, cheap cologne.

Does anyone remember the concentrated version of Passion for men that was available in the early 90s? It was called concentrated cologne and it had a golden crest symbol on the bottle. As a matter of fact its the bottle pictured above on this page. I dont know how long that version was available, but I cant find it or anything about it nowdays, but I remember buying a 4oz bottle of it in 1991 and liking it MUCH better than the original, although the original is good, but not as intoxicating, or intense and long lasting as the concentrated version was. I think theyre using a lot of synthetics in the version nowdays because it has a weird chemical smell in the drydown that was never there before. If that be the case Its really a shame they have to skimp on quality ingredients and ruin a good thing. To my nose, they did the same thing to the womens version...so sad.

Aromatic ( Fougere + Spicy ) + then powdery >> trace woody.

Top notes are wonderful fougere and spicy. Intense, manly and powerful, kinda like the name implies. I was hoping this would continue but no viagra here. Instead, it turns into a powdery version of the fougere which is deodoranty and very forgetable. very trace wood scent.

Starts off hard, goes limp in no time. Sorry Liz! Never my style - I would much rather take on Safari than this...