Paul Smith for Men (2000)
by Paul Smith

This is a beautiful fragrance. Very summery, but can be worn all year round. It smells really clean and doesnt really smell of anthing imparticular. However, I do agree with the guy talking about the freshy mown grass smell, that's the vibe it gives off. The longevity and projection isn't that great, I think Mr. Smith needs to be having words with Mr. Gaultier about that, but it's a nice fresh fragrance nonetheless.

16th January, 2012.

Doesn't do anything for me, very green and slightly synthetic and also very forgettable, yet I can see this making a good (and very cheap) summer day time fragrance. Very easy to wear but not very exciting.

12nd August, 2011.

Green, and refreshing, yet may garner many negative comments. For a man, this smells more feminine. To compare it to something, 212 for women comes to mind. As it dries, it becomes much less feminine, and loud. The opening just reminds me of a really busy make up counter, but it quickly mellows out. Overall effect: Another boring run of the mill fragrance.

9th August, 2011.

for me its the best perfume from paul smith for man. reminds a lot of glorious farehneit by dior, but still stands original and alternative, personal favourite.

29th May, 2011.

A good fragrance , fresh and crispy.
As many mentioned about similarities to Dior Fahrenheit , in my view PSMen is more similar to Lucky #6 , but less sweet. Fahrenheit is way way way complex and deeper than PSMen.
If you will buy it only because of the comparisons about Fahrenheit , and you love Fahrenheit. Don't buy it !!!
Without any comparisons PSMen is a good fragrance.

21st September, 2010.

Fresly cut green grass on a summer's day. Not soapy to my nose as others have stated. I would also say the sillage is below average as is the projection (not terrible, but I wish it wafted more). All in all, a good scent which would be made great by upping the projection a bit.

17th May, 2010.