Login or register to rate or review Pleasures for Men and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

Pleasures for Men (1997)
by Estée Lauder

Image Credit: Basenotes
  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:

Basenotes says...

A fresh male fragrance from Estée Lauder, launched to capitalise on the success of the original Pleasures for Women. Very good for the summer.

Pleasures for Men Fragrance Notes

Reviews of Pleasures for Men

Showing 6 out of a total of 23 reviews

Show: 9 positive | 5 neutral | 9 negative


Add your review of Pleasures for Men


25 reviews

Wouldn't wear this filth if paid. Smells like citrus in the last stages of decomposistion; for the life of me I cannot figure out why women love this garbage. I'll stick w/ Intuition or Lauder for men when it comes to Estee Lauder scents.
11 August 2008


2135 reviews

Feels like the likes of Kenzo pour Homme or other "sporty and blue" fragrances but not the same. I think this is a nice compliment to Pleasures for Women. Though it could be a supplement because a few of the women said they liked it better than the Women's version. A nice airy floral that's a little feminine.
14 June 2008


reviews

spendid stuff from lauder, a everyday edt, though it also carrys a special occasion
air about it, fresh, floral, honest. my wife has often commented that in combination
with its aftershave balm its her favourite mens scent, its mine too
12 June 2008


56 reviews

Sometimes you just want to smell good ... not crazy, not challenging, not esoteric, just good. Hello, Pleasures! Though some might call him boring, he's just a basic t-shirt and jeans scent. No, he's not going to change the world, he might not even save the day, but he smells good enough to keep around.
28 May 2008


19 reviews

I thought this fragrance smells like grape. Fresh and crispy.
20 January 2008


42 reviews

I've been checking out the fresher side of men's fragrances of late. It could be the not-so-stiff competition, it could be personal skin chemistry...hell, I admit it could be my nose, which is far less refined than I had imagined. Among the fresh/clean crop, this is decidedly good. Still not quite great mind you, but with enough substance to set it subtly apart from the pack it seems to run with.

My only real complaint is the laundry detergent/fabric softener note that usually turns me off to many in this bunch is still present, though it's mercifully dialed way down and fades even further over the drydown, where it sweetens ever so slightly as an almost potpourri-like blend of woods, spices and dried fruit develops, with a translucent haze of floral notes, ozone and laundromat notes.

And make no mistake, it's floral alright. I would brand it unisex only on reflection, though my first impulse would be to market it to women.

I hesitate to call it a masterpiece, but among its kind it is well done, possessing an innocence and utter lack of sex appeal about it that renders it oddly endearing from a route less taken in the olfactory labyrinth.

Plus (confession time) my Dad wears it from time to time. Mostly emotional but tempered by pragmatism, as of now make this a 6.5/10.
29 December 2007

Show all 23 Pleasures for Men reviews

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Pleasures for Men products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Pleasures for Men by Estée Lauder that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Pleasures for Men by Estée Lauder from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2008 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom
c