Login or
register to rate or review Pleasures for Men and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
 Image Credit: Basenotes | - Availability: In Production
- Perfumer:
- Bottle Designer:
|
|
Basenotes says...
A fresh male fragrance from Estée Lauder, launched to capitalise on the success of the original Pleasures for Women. Very good for the summer.
Pleasures for Men Fragrance Notes
Reviews of Pleasures for Men
Showing 6 out of a total of 23 reviews
Show: 9 positive | 5 neutral | 9 negative
Add your review of Pleasures for Men
 25 reviews
|  Wouldn't wear this filth if paid. Smells like citrus in the last stages of decomposistion; for the life of me I cannot figure out why women love this garbage. I'll stick w/ Intuition or Lauder for men when it comes to Estee Lauder scents. 11 August 2008 |
 2135 reviews
|  Feels like the likes of Kenzo pour Homme or other "sporty and blue" fragrances but not the same. I think this is a nice compliment to Pleasures for Women. Though it could be a supplement because a few of the women said they liked it better than the Women's version. A nice airy floral that's a little feminine. 14 June 2008 |
 reviews
|  spendid stuff from lauder, a everyday edt, though it also carrys a special occasion air about it, fresh, floral, honest. my wife has often commented that in combination with its aftershave balm its her favourite mens scent, its mine too 12 June 2008 |
 56 reviews
|  Sometimes you just want to smell good ... not crazy, not challenging, not esoteric, just good. Hello, Pleasures! Though some might call him boring, he's just a basic t-shirt and jeans scent. No, he's not going to change the world, he might not even save the day, but he smells good enough to keep around. 28 May 2008 |
 19 reviews
|  I thought this fragrance smells like grape. Fresh and crispy. 20 January 2008 |
 42 reviews
|  I've been checking out the fresher side of men's fragrances of late. It could be the not-so-stiff competition, it could be personal skin chemistry...hell, I admit it could be my nose, which is far less refined than I had imagined. Among the fresh/clean crop, this is decidedly good. Still not quite great mind you, but with enough substance to set it subtly apart from the pack it seems to run with. My only real complaint is the laundry detergent/fabric softener note that usually turns me off to many in this bunch is still present, though it's mercifully dialed way down and fades even further over the drydown, where it sweetens ever so slightly as an almost potpourri-like blend of woods, spices and dried fruit develops, with a translucent haze of floral notes, ozone and laundromat notes. And make no mistake, it's floral alright. I would brand it unisex only on reflection, though my first impulse would be to market it to women. I hesitate to call it a masterpiece, but among its kind it is well done, possessing an innocence and utter lack of sex appeal about it that renders it oddly endearing from a route less taken in the olfactory labyrinth. Plus (confession time) my Dad wears it from time to time. Mostly emotional but tempered by pragmatism, as of now make this a 6.5/10. 29 December 2007 |
Show all 23 Pleasures for Men reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Pleasures for Men products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Pleasures for Men by Estée Lauder that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Pleasures for Men by Estée Lauder from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes