Woods of Windsor for Gentleman (1981)
|
|
Reviews of Woods of Windsor for Gentleman| GentlemanFarmer SwitzerlandShow all reviews | Beautifully melancholic and decadent, I find myself using it more and more often…Surely, it would have had its place in the collection of Alexis de Redé. 30th January, 2011. |
![]() Kav United StatesShow all reviews | It has been revived in the EDT. And as with so many others they felt compelled to reformulate with a base given as patchouli and wood moss. The packaging has some manner of new tribal tattoo, or is it a stylised green man under the castle and a price increase. The spray unit with 50 lb trigger pull and bottle remain unscathed. They could have gone really contemporary and placed a bean a la mescal gausino in the bottle in honour of the accountants who took over. 3rd May, 2010. (Last Edited: 13rd October, 2010.) |
| WhosYerBob United StatesShow all reviews | Woods of Windsor is interesting in that it doesn't open with a sharp citrus blast like so many other fragrances. The citrus instead comes out fairly muted and quickly moves to the middle and base notes which develop into a nice dry woody/leathery scent. Not green, pine or citrusy enough for me, and too close to sandalwood for my wife. I'll pass on this one, but I think it would appeal to a lot of guys. 10th January, 2010. |
![]() shamu1 United StatesShow all reviews | This is a classic, very old-school, British-styled fragrance, plain and simple. Although leather is not listed as a note, wearing this constantly brings to mind images of leather saddles, the interior of an old Bentley, leather-bound chairs, country clubs, old libraries, etc.. Although it's not as powdery as most scents that are labelled as "dandified", I would have to say that this qualifies as a very formal and dandified fragrance. It is very spicy and woody, though not in a wild, hot-blooded manner (see Yatagan or Mazzolari Lui for that), but rather in a very gentlemanly, formal and a bit stodgy way. It's made of good quality ingredients from what I can tell and is inexpensive so is definitely worth buying if you're looking for a very proper, formal fragrance. Fans of Bois du Portugal would probably like this, though it isn't as complex, warm or rich as it. This is a good scent, but it isn't my style at all. 24th August, 2009. (Last Edited: 26th August, 2009.) |
![]() sabrosa United StatesShow all reviews | Good solid "gentlemanly" fragrance. Subtle, woody. 10th April, 2009. |
| odysseusm CanadaShow all reviews | Woods of Windsor for Gentlemen is a striking sort of scent. It is distinctive – and I would say commendable – for NOT having any softening or often heavy elements so often found in men’s fragrances. There are no florals, nor is there any vanilla, patchouli or amber. What results is a classy and very dry spicy-wood scent. It is earthy and robust, but it is not sweet or heavy. The initial citrus phase is brief. The next phase is a citrus-spice mélange. The spices are peppery (nutmeg) and sharp (clove) and give a charming, old-school ‘barbershop’ vibe. These aromatics blend well into the third phase, a spicy wood. I can’t identify the particular wood; it fills a supportive rather than starring role. Despite being inexpensive, it has good quality and is thus very good value. And it comes in a variety of related toiletry products. I think it is worth seeking out if you like a dry, spicy wood scent. 15th January, 2008. (Last Edited: 5th April, 2008.) |
Latest Woods of Windsor for Gentleman Threads
BobK
wore this 3 weeks ago