Shop for Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme
 |
|
All Stockists
Other fragrances by Paco Rabanne
Fragrance Profile
Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme (2002)
by Paco Rabanne
 |
|
main page
member reviews
community search
submit information
Basenotes says...
A year after the launch of Ultraviolet Man comes 'Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme'. A modern update, in a updated bottle of the 1973 original. A fresher cleaner scent which retains the lavender notes of the original. Designed to appeal to fans of the classic version and newcomers alike. Launched in September 2002 in France, Belgium, Italy and Asia, with the rest of the world coming in 2003.
Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme Fragrance Notes
- Top Notes
- Orange Flower, Bergamot, Lemon .
Middle Notes- Pepper, Basil, Vetiver.
Base Notes- Cedarwood, Olibanum, Sandalwood, Leather.
Reviews of Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme
Showing 6 out of a total of 11 reviews
Show: 8 positive | 2 neutral | 1 negative
Add your review of Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme
   |  Really? People like this? It seems as straightforward and as “clean” a smell as toilet cleaner. Not only do I not like this as a fragrance, but I actually can’t stand the smell. It gives me a headache within minutes. I don’t want people (and I mean anyone) to smell like this. 04 October 2008 |
 |  Eh, I don't really like this one. I don't dislike it either. I typically like the fresher scents, but this seems to be a whole new level of boring. This is the olfactory equivalent of Wonder Bread. Although doing a 'nose to the skin' appraisal makes out some individual notes, they're like the fading memories of a dream you had earlier in the week.It also doesn't seem to have any female appeal, and that's always something to consider as well. "Uh, well, I guess it's nice," seems to be the resounding sentiment among the fairer sex. 25 August 2008 |
 |  I don't think anyone can dislike this. One of the best clean, fresh scents out there great for the hot summer. Very comforting water-esque peppery citrus. Great!09 July 2008 |
  | Oh crap, I bought this tonight by accident when I was looking for the regular Paco pour Homme. And this smells nothing like the original. The beginning is too alcoholic and the dry-down smells like awful perfume for teenage girls. Just awful. Let's hope I can exchange it. 10 June 2008 |
  | A modernised version of the 1973 classic. This is the way to do subtle & fresh but still support some warmth and character during the drydown. A fave for sure, especially during the warmer months... 18 December 2007 |
  | You can sense the hand (nose) of an artist (Cresp) in this juice: well blended and smooth if über conventional, but very unlike its aggressive elder brother from the 70s. Conventional but unique in its own right. It lasts well and I suspect there's quite a bit of sillage to boot: got positive feedback from a date one evening. Clean, comfortable and highly wearable, even on a summer's evening out. 06 November 2007 |
Show all 11 Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme by Paco Rabanne that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Eau de Paco Rabanne pour Homme by Paco Rabanne from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
Report an Error
Twitter
Facebook
MySpace
Last.fm
All Editorial
