Login or register to rate or review New Tradition and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

New Tradition (2002)
by Etro

  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:

Reviews of New Tradition

Showing 6 out of a total of 7 reviews

Show: 1 positive | 2 neutral | 4 negative


Add your review of New Tradition


4 reviews

At first sniff I had a comparison with Tova Signature in mind but the fragrance changes into some spicey musk on me. Great!
22 February 2009


502 reviews

It smells kind of interesting at first sniff, but then it very soon becomes very unpleasant and eventually even off-putting.

I must agree with some that is really does have a strange, (cheap) after-shave vibe to it. (I don’t smell Old Spice though)
It is also extremely skin product / lotion smelling. It reminds me very very much of some ordinary sun-lotion.

Then there is definitely something animalic lurking underneath of it all. I am surprised no one has mentioned anything about it. Its that same kind of animalic tone which, again, can be found in some cheap grocery store after-shaves. Its very masculine shade this uncivilized and edgy musky smell; I believe it might actually be even an actual civet ingredient (synthetic, naturally).


Definitely not for me, but I’ll give this one a neutral rating just because it has some interesting aspects and I can easily recommend this controversial juice for anyone to try.
15 February 2009


3258 reviews

New Tradition begins with that sharp cologny / alcohol note that was so typical of the men’s older fragrances, likely attributable to the geranium with some help from the clove. But just as in most of the older fragrances, it quickly settles down to a very acceptable ambiance. It is still rather sharp, because of the lavender, clove, and geranium combination, but I kind of like it because it does remind me of the older fragrances, so I suppose the opening is the “tradition” part of the fragrance. The patchouli of the base is, I guess, the “new”: I can’t find anything else that qualifies. The base is pleasant, too, and lasts respectably. New Tradition is a good scent: it has quite good ingredients and is well constructed, but it is unexciting. I simply don’t see the need to resurrect a “new” past when there are loads of better traditional fragrances available for much better prices; and I don’t see the need to buy this simply because it’s an Etro when there are lots of Etros much better than this one.
16 October 2007


197 reviews

Eau de Victoria Secrets. This smells like the sachets ladies use in their lingerie drawers, or those fat little hangers for their intimate garments. To think someone things this is a man's fragrance. Unbelieveable.
16 February 2007


199 reviews

I smell the tradition, but not the new. Smells like some old cheap aftershave that my grandfather used to wear. Reminds me of Old Spice, even though it really doesn't smell the same. Its really musty and lavendery, and I just don't like it.
11 April 2006


435 reviews

I just didn't care for it - reminded me of a Lancome moisturizer, with a strange rosey note in the middle, and bitter hesperides in the top. Too sharp for me.
15 January 2006

Show all 7 New Tradition reviews

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related New Tradition products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about New Tradition by Etro that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about New Tradition by Etro from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2009 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom