|
|
An updated signature Dunhill scent, which is woody and fougere in style. The bottle is inspired by the sleek design of a British sports car.
$46.19 75ml EdT | $55.64 100ml Cologne | $32.40 75ml EdT |
Reviews of Dunhill ![]() zonker United StatesShow all reviews | This fragrance is like that person you pass on the street you're not able to place or that melody you've heard before but can't quite peg: it's evasive but you know you know it from somewhere. Perhaps it's the battle between the lemon and geranium, or the overture of cedarwood which seems to have a place in this the entire time; or maybe it's the mossy, musky combination of tonka and masculinity that oozes out slowly at the finish. A solid but not spectacular fragrance on me (or for my nose), it's brassy, noticeable, and probably a few people will turn their heads if not for the very reason that they THINK they've maybe smelled you somewhere before ... 7th January, 2012. |
![]() kida2007 United KingdomShow all reviews | Not bad, from the pyramid list you'd think it smells like everything else but it does have a really stand out soapy note to it ( i think its the orris) 2nd January, 2012. |
| Redbeard United StatesShow all reviews | Geir Lite (featuring Splenda)? Initially a light cherry soap with just a bit of that same fizzy sparkle. A little anise and cinnamon gives a slight pep, but the underlying wood is a lot sweeter than most of its competitors. The cherry component also gets more and more pronounced as it proceeds. Soon there's really nothing else left except perhaps for some talcum powder, and the sparkle is gone. Even the spices quietly acquiesce to the cherry, in spite of it not being overly strong. If you don't dislike cherry as much as I do, you probably won't find it objectionable, but potentially very dull. 4th May, 2011. |
![]() Trevjim Show all reviews | I really like this one, had a few compliments about it, there is something it reminds me and a few others of but i still havnt been able to work it out. lasts an ok amount of time. 10th July, 2010. |
![]() dreamer81 SlovakiaShow all reviews | This is in my top 10 worst fragrances. I liked it on first few tries because it was new, and I admit that some people may like it but it is everything else but me. Very hard to describe. I smell something sweet here (almost like chocolate) but also very synthetic chemical note that I hate which makes me sneeze. Its suitable for some 40+ aristocratic guy in formal dressing, but thats it. I dont get anything fresh or natural from it. Definitely NOT SAFE BLIND BUY. Hard to wash off too. 26th June, 2010. |
![]() Show all reviews | I should confess, i got many compliments for this, Men and women. 27th May, 2010. |
Latest Dunhill Threads|
| Heritage (vintage) vs. Patou Pour Homme vs. Dunhill Blend 30 started by döfä91 |
|
| dunhill x centric started by gert1980 |
|
| Dunhill for Men (2003) - Strange 1st Meeting! started by zonker |
|
| Dunhill Edition - Reformulated Version started by Jack Hunter |
|
| Dunhill Spray Rum started by bhanny |
|
| dunhill desire red started by iceman210283 |
|
| Original Dunhill for Men (1934)... Discontinued or Not? started by product |
|
| dunhill for men classic cologne 1934 (light brown box or dark brown box), same cologne? started by danny1967 |
|
| dunhill for men classic cologne 1934 (light brown box or dark brown box), same cologne? started by danny1967 |
|
| Dunhill English Lavender - has anyone heard of this ? started by david |
Francop
wore this about 14 hours ago