Fragrance Profile

Reviews of Ciel for Him (2003)
by Amouage

  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:
View the main Ciel for Him page.

Reviews of Ciel for Him

Showing all 13 reviews

Show: 6 positive | 1 neutral | 6 negative


Add your review of Ciel for Him


2219 reviews

Ciel opens with what have become masculine perfumery’s conventional fresh fruit and aromatic notes, quickly joined by sweet white flowers. The flowers, particularly orange blossom, soon come to dominate, while the fruit persists to keep the midnotes very bright and crisp. It takes some time for a very soft incense to reveal itself, carrying the scent in a much more individual direction.

Next to emerge is a very creamy sandalwood, followed by the merest dab of vetiver. The incense, wood and vetiver meld into a very pleasant foundation, atop which the floral and fruit notes play. Though very little of ozonic character appears, the scent retains a certain “moist” feel to it. There are also some very brief flashes of sweet spices, most noticeably nutmeg, but not enough to take the floral/fruit accord into mom’s pie territory. The floral notes recede ever so slowly during the extended drydown, eventually leaving a sweet, lightly spiced base of incense, woods, and vetiver.

Ciel is a lighter, brighter scent than either Dia or Reflection. It flirts more closely with the commonplace fresh fougère fragrances that have emerged in the wake of Creed’s Green Irish Tweed and Davidoff’s Cool Water, but distinguishes itself through fine ingredients, complexity, and a more obviously floral character. Ciel can be worn very much like Green Irish Tweed, and would make a nice alternative, especially for those who crave a little more spice and can accept a rather bluntly floral men’s fragrance. Ciel also has far better longevity for me. I think it would be easy for a woman to wear, too. In sum, it’s not as distinctive as some others from this house, but it is a worthy scent that extends the line toward a younger and more casual wearer.
06 October 2009


502 reviews

Harsh, sharp and bitter opening is a total mess and it takes awhile before it settles down, but when it does, I find this surprisingly unique and weird smelling fragrance!

Very interesting scent.


It has a detectible rose note, and in times I could even call this a rose scent….but of course it is not that rose prominent after all, and besides, the actual rose frags are usually quite simple and sometimes even one dimensional, but Ciel has very much going on in many layers.

Like I said, very weird smelling stuff overall to me, from start to finish. Puzzling juice. Smells floral, fruity, spicy and woody, together and apart! Keeps on changing, and it lasts a long time.

It’s very crispy, almost crunchy. One of those scents which makes me want to bite my wrist, its actually that delicious.

Full-bottle wise it is way too expensive scent for what it offers - after all - but enjoyable sniffing experience nevertheless. For sure I will give my 2ml sample a shot from time to time.

This would smell wonderful on a woman too, btw.
03 February 2009


123 reviews

This has many blue and green notes in it I like, some seem luxurious and even convey a natural and smooth feel. But there is also a strong, familiar, slightly "muted-bitter" accord that was common amongst many high-end late 80's scents, and it is not a fresh/aquatic note, it is a bitter masculine note that I can't place. It is blended so that the entire fragrance seems to be a unified accord, and would have been better without the "dull-bitter" 1989 heart note. I would give it a neutral if the price wasn't absurd.
01 February 2009


3393 reviews

This is spicy and fresh much like many designer fragrances today. This fragrance, however, dares to add a drop of an animalic element. It nice but it feels like it's trying to be something it's not.
25 September 2008


21 reviews

A very strong honey smell Yuk!
22 April 2008


255 reviews

It has been a while since a fragrance has moved me this much.

This is a beautiful uplifting positive fragrance which works for me in fine spring weather when I am feeling the joys of being alive. The initial blast of light flowers and sparkling citrus with an aldehydic roundness drops off into frankincense (the best I have ever smelled) and mixed florals with a slight fruity sweetness surrounding a fantastic rose. This accord persists for some hours, the bitter edge of the pure smelling frankincense is mellowed with great craft and skill by the other notes. This is the standout feature for me, an innovative and very successful handling of a note that is difficult to blend and can be dominant in an unpleasant way. The drydown also is very pleasing with all the notes still detectible, a slight powder and an accord which reminds me of the floral aspects of guerlain's famous base with some bitterness from the incense remaining; blended with the other notes this puts me in mind of a bigarrade note, though this late in the development it cannot be that. No vanilla here though.

Overall, an underrated and quietly arresting fragrance which actually delivers, to me at least, though it is true that there may be limited days which are appropriate for its wear.
19 April 2008


26 reviews

Ciel announces its glorious arrival with refreshing and cooling bergamot. The lavender takes mingles in the shadows of bergamot while the floral heart develops. The spices namely frankincense, envelops the composition gracefully white a subtle delight never forcing domination of the floral goodness. Ciel is smooth, welcoming, and as fresh as the azure sky and ocean of Dubai. However, when I step back and waft the fragrance to me, I get am image of the green beachfront waters. Dare I say that I smell a green floral fragrance with exceptional quality and appeal? Ciel is far superior to Creed’s Royal Delight which is strikingly similar but inferior. If you love the floral heart and frankincense of Dia but don’t enjoy the essence of baby powder and want something for office, gym, or romantic use, then look no further. Ciel is bright and uplifting. This works in many situations and therefore is one of my all-time favorites. Ciel is a King among Kings!

17 October 2007


128 reviews

disappointment. I tried to imagine spring mornin ,nothin close. I can't wear this stuff. its appealing to some but not here. terrible
16 December 2006


3258 reviews

I’m afraid Ciel for Him is a rather disappointing fragrance to me: First, its opening is unimpressive—a sharp, floral / herbal backed up by a light incense and cedar. The peach seems to enter into the opening also, creating what is to me a discordance that I find a touch unpleasant. I really can’t separate out the floral notes because it’s an amalgamated accord—blended to the point of seeming forced or artificial. The top accord is restrained, dignified, different, not sweet, not strong, but thick, nevertheless, having a bit of a heaviness to it. The truth is that I just don’t find these notes very appealing. Next, with the mid notes I lose the florals completely when the spices have grow into prominence. The cardamom, cinnamon, and nutmeg form a spice cabinet effect that manages to conjure up in my mind some old Moroccan flashbacks—images of tent shows and belly dancers—nothing authentic, just strictly for us tourists (thankfully I didn’t get a flashback of the camel fragrances). The dry down, however, is warm, rich, and long lasting wood and incense, but too late to save the fragrance for me. It’s possible that I just don’t understand this type of fragrance, but I don’t have the slightest urge to even try this again, let alone, purchase it.
07 October 2006


286 reviews

As with all the Amouage scents, lots of frankincense. This is probably the most floral of the men's scents. It has a very uplifting quality...the name is an accurate reflection of the scent. Very blue skies and happiness sort of scent. As with all frankincense scents, Ciel puts me in a reflective mood. Here it's a daydreamy reflection, not brooding or pensive at all. For sure this one is unisex. If you don't like light florals and incense, I wouldn't even try it. If you usually like scents that walk the line between masculine and feminine, it's worth a test.
02 August 2006


12 reviews

I was pretty disappointed with Ciel. To me it smells like a very synthetic, spicy and slightly feminine scent which stays too close to the skin. When I put my nose to my wrist even after sufficient dry down time, the top spice note doesn't wear off on my skin and is quite burning to the nostrils. I wouldn’t recommend this scent for men or ladies. :(
16 August 2005


2 reviews

The best frankincense performance !!!
10 April 2004


33 reviews

After receiving a few samples of Ciel I was hoping I'd love it since the Amouage name is renowned. Unfortunately, I was disappointed by the very heady and feminine floral that it is. I think Amouage is trying to capture a younger more mainstream market with this new release, but it certainly will not appeal to many men, young or old, that I know. The ladies like it, but not on a man. I love practically all scents for different reasons, but I'd have to give this one a generous rating of "neutral"
05 November 2003

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Ciel for Him products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Ciel for Him by Amouage that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Ciel for Him by Amouage from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2009 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom