Login or register to rate or review Burberry for Men (Version #2) and access other features...
Fragrance Profile

Burberry for Men (Version #2) (1992)
by Burberry

Image Credit: Damosels-Domain
  • Availability: Discontinued
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:

Reviews of Burberry for Men (Version #2)

Showing all 2 reviews

Show: 1 positive | neutral | 1 negative


Add your review of Burberry for Men (Version #2)


100 reviews

One of the best British men's scent. A shame this is so hardly mentioned when it's just so good. I just can't stop sniffing it on my arms. An absolute gem.
01 June 2009


67 reviews

Classic fragrance that I can't seem to wrap my head around. As a fan of many Burberry fragrances, I delighted at the chance to try one of the "vintage" formulas. From the get go, the mixture reminded me of a leather belt marinading in a balsamic vinegar dusted with pine needles. It may have been skin chemistry, but this Burberry offering became insanely tangy and cloying on me. I will not revisit this disappointment, and in fact.. my salivary glands are becoming active in just thinking about it (and not in a good way).
07 March 2007

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Burberry for Men (Version #2) products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Burberry for Men (Version #2) by Burberry that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Burberry for Men (Version #2) by Burberry from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2009 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom