It for Men (2004)
by Peter Thomas Roth

One modification to the notes listed here at Basenotes. The Peter Thomas Roth website lists the top notes not as merely "citrus", but intstead as "Wet Brillant Accord of Citrus Aromas." Well, to my nose the opening doesn't show any citrus brilliance and of any scent that has boasted of citrus, the presentation here is poor. What I get is a "burnt spice accord", possibly some cardamom and any citrus is lurking in the background. After several hours, I get a slightly sour spiciness, the burnt character having dissipated. I don't consider this to be generic or like everything else I have tried. It, in spite of its generic name, seems to be a unique fragrance. But I don't find it to be pleasant and it is not one that I like on myself at all.

30th June, 2008.

Nothing special, but certainly not offensive. Lots of citrus plus some woodsy spice. It smells a great deal like everything else out there. Poor longevity and sillage. I wear it to bed or after a shower when I do not plan on leaving the house.

4th December, 2006.