Fragrance Profile
Reviews of Beyond Paradise for Men (2004)
by Estée Lauder
- Availability: In Production
- Perfumer: Calice Becker
- Bottle Designer:
Negative Reviews of Beyond Paradise for Men
Showing all 20 Negative reviews
Show all of the Beyond Paradise for Men reviews
Add your review of Beyond Paradise for Men
 131 reviews
|  I have tried this on at department stores numerous times, but I can't get past the initial shock of a cat urine-like stench. It does dry down to a more complex composition, but there is that feral sub-odor that repulses my olfactory sensibility and makes me gag. This scent is a cross-blending of beauty and depravity, intended for the Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde-type personality. Beyond Belief is what I call it. What were they thinking? 12 May 2009 |
 2 reviews
|  Smells like rotten fallen citrus fruit, very disappointing. 06 May 2009 |
 131 reviews
|  I cannot think why this horridly cheap and nasty concoction achieved 5 stars in The Guide. This would be acceptable for a cheap shower gel or deodorant but that is about it. I am totally puzzled as to why The Guide would so wholeheartedly praise something so pedestrian. Cheap cheap cheap. 29 March 2009 |
 8 reviews
|  I fell foul of Luca Turin's notes for this one. He's clearly having a practical joke. Either that or it seriously doesn't work on my skin. Soapy and cloyingly sweet, and hideously juvenile. To me it's the equivalent of a white tracksuit and baseball cap. ...And I bought two bottles. 29 March 2009 |
 32 reviews
|  Unlike mrclmind, I bought this before I read Luca Turin's review....once I read his opinion, I thought that I needed to give it another chance....I completely agree with mrclmind. I would prefer to wear that blue Derek Jeter concoction to this. It is a generic citrus mess with less longevity than a lush hand lotion. I only paid 20 bucks for a 3.4, and it was about 19.50 too much. Please try this before adding it to a collection based on Turin's review, mine only gathers dust.... 17 January 2009 |
 123 reviews
|  the words are missing, so disappointing the experience has been!according to luca turin this is an A-class scent- i definitely cannot agree and as it has been already said the biggest waste of money and one of the worst perfumes i ever smelled!A cheap fruit basket on the lowest level- a simple mixture of tropical fruits.....very sweet, disturbing, badly mixed up, very chemical and artificial melange and as it has been aready said-at the certain point the scent becomes exhausting, unpleasant and nerving, almost causing headaches.There comes the point when you can´t smell it anymore!This one of the worst and most horrible perfumes I have ever bought!Really awful and bad! It is so sad because this company has produced such great scents as Lauder for men,JHL and do not forget Private cllection,Alliage, Youth Dew-masterpieces!What is happening to this company?If Estee Lauder knew......................... 12 December 2008 |
 13 reviews
|  Fruity bug spray? Who would've thought. Avoid it like the plague. I actually had a few decent frags sprayed on my arms today & this rubbish took over. 03 October 2008 |
 3393 reviews
|  A citrusy oakmoss that just doesn't cut it. Disappears after an hour on my skin with not even a trace of the scent. I had to re-smell the bottle just to make sure I wasn't losing my sense of smell of the stuff. 17 September 2008 |
 212 reviews
|  This was one of the few blind buys I've ever made. Most of the fragrances in my wardrobe I enjoy, or I wouldn't have bought them. The only reason I bought a mini of this was based on Luca Turin's review. I have tried and tried to like it. I thought it might grow on me, but every time I smell it I just think "Bleah." To me, Beyond Paradise for Men is a headache inducing melange of very synthetic smelling abstract notes that create an extremely unpleasant dissonance. I don't like how it smells on a blotter, I don't like it out of the bottle, and I don't like it on my skin. I find it thoroughly unpleasant. There are several fragrances that I don't enjoy yet I can still appreciate their composition; Yet I don't smell the artistry that others have described in this one at all. This is the worst fragrance I own. 23 August 2008 |
 148 reviews
|  It puzzles me to no end that Luca Turin considers this a masterpiece. I smell a cheap, synthetic, fruity aquatic that distinguishes itself from its peers solely by virtue of a melon note so obnoxious that it upends the entire composition. I've forced myself to wear it several times to see if maybe time would reveal its putative charms, but no doing. THIS is supposed to be one of the top ten masculines on the market? More proof, as if any were needed, that listening to perfume "experts" is a waste of time. Our subjective perceptions of smell are so variable, and so individual, that other people's opinions are irrelevant. Just sample everything and buy what you like. 17 June 2008 |
 18 reviews
|  This smells quite far from how I imagine paradise or anything beyond. Clearly the presence of oak moss has something to do with my dislike for this scent; I have quite often noticed that the scents that I really can't stand, contain moss. But Beyond Paradise for Men's other notes also fail to please my nose. Thumbs down from me. 28 May 2008 |
 375 reviews
|  I'm afraid some houses treat their male fragrance buyers with utter contempt, i.e. any old rubbish will do. This is a case in point. Kaern 12 May 2008 |
 861 reviews
|  Gee -- a fruity aquatic in a metrosexual bottle. How very original. PASS. 23 October 2007 |
 6 reviews
|  I tried this today and was dissappointed. The one in the magazine add smelled truly beyond paradise. When I sprayed it on me today at first I didn't like it, but then after awhile it was a pleasant scent. Problem is I have to put my nose right up to my skin to smell it. 06 April 2007 |
 9 reviews
|  Honestly, Beyond Paradise has to be the single most generic, synthetic cologne I have ever smelled. It smells like a blue toilet freshener and gives you a headache in about 1 minute. Total crap! 24 April 2006 |
 744 reviews
|  beyond masculinity beyond sugar beyond cheap Is this intentded as a caricature of the lighter tropical juices in the CSP line? 07 March 2006 |
 5 reviews
|  The scent is just too sweet and fruity. To me it didnt smell manly at all. Maybe if you like overly sweet and fruity scents, perhaps you should try it. Otherwise, steer clear. 24 January 2006 |
 50 reviews
|  Awful! It's so sickeningly sweet I'm surprised people wearing it haven't been attacked by swarms of bees and whole ant colonies! One of the worst fragrances I've smelled. 24 November 2005 |
 7 reviews
|  I have to say that this cologne is overly sweet and grassy. It kind of reminds me of what bes would chase in the middle of July if you scented up and then mowed. If you like very sweet and fruity frags it may be for you. 15 October 2005 |
 89 reviews
|  Smells like old watermelon candy and an overripe canteloupe. Fruity, sicky sweet- some might even say downright nasty. Another cheap edition to the Estee Lauder men's line. With better fragrances out there, it's hard to see why anyone would pick this fruity little monstrosity. Yuck. Totally gross. 04 August 2005 |
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Beyond Paradise for Men products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Beyond Paradise for Men by Estée Lauder that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Beyond Paradise for Men by Estée Lauder from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes