Login or
register to rate or review Rosewood and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
| - Availability: In Production
- Perfumer:
- Bottle Designer:
|
|
Basenotes says...
Part of the 'Discovery Collection'
Reviews of Rosewood
Showing all 6 reviews
Show: 2 positive | 1 neutral | 3 negative
Add your review of Rosewood
 3385 reviews
|  Cover the name up, then the scent does wonders. A powdery woodsy sweet tea fragrance and I find it excellent. Of the others in The Discovery Collection, I'd prefer to smell this one a girl than Malachite or Alabaster (they were too harsh and I must point out that those two don't have their names as notes in their fragrances either). Rosewood is linear, and to the point but not in your face about it (unless you actually spray it in your face!). No rose but unlike the saying, this one smells sweeter than actual roses. 13 November 2009 |
 1 reviews
|  I like the scent, but what about the badly designed bottle? I bought the spray, and was unable to use at least a fourth of the bottle, because the bottom is domed and the tube doesn't reach into the corners! I liked the scent but B-R needs to redesign this bottle! 19 January 2009 |
 23 reviews
|  This is *NOT* rosewood. Please, Dear perfumers at BR, do not name a fragrance after a note that's not even in it! The reason I tried this on me (and what a grave mistake that was...) was that I thought it would be a mature, feminine scent just like rosewood is. It was not to be. Alas, I was hit with a wave of sweetness straight after application that just kept intensifying into this cloud of cheap, cloying candy. Now, I have no problem with sweetness, if it comes in a digestable form - Dior's Hypnotic Poision is a good example of a good kind of sweet. But this one... No thanks! 03 August 2008 |
 4 reviews
|  Smells just like my nootka rose bushes watered on a hot summer's evening. Delightful. I would love a more masculine rendition. 25 April 2008 |
 682 reviews
|  Initially, this is the 2006 Banana Republic fragrance that attracted me the most. Furthermore, the initial notes are the most attractive. The bergamot top note is lovely and (sadly) the only note remniscent of rosewood. After it makes its exit, the rest is all sweetness. The tea and amber merge to create an almost white chocolate blend. (Angel pioneered this sweet + earthy accord that you can smell in so many perfumes nowadays. Here it is again, minus the mint and patchouli.) As for the champagne note, I think I imagine somthing fizzy and sour near the end, but only because I'm impressionable. If you seek real rosewood, try Tam Dao. 06 February 2007 |
 29 reviews
|  Interesting that this frag would be called Rosewood as the official notes (according to bananarepublic.com) are champagne bergamot, white amber, and white tea. Rosewood does have a distinctly rosey scent, and a woody one as well, however, it's rather linear and not that exciting. Opens and stays floral for the majority of the frag's lifecycle, until it dries down into white tea with what I'd guess is patchouli anchoring it. It reminds me a bit of tea rose, and the heady, thick tea rose of Perfumer's Workshop. The scent is not unpleasant, but it's no jaw-dropper either. 16 January 2007 |
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Rosewood products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Rosewood by Banana Republic that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Rosewood by Banana Republic from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes