Shop for Gucci Pour Homme II
 |
|
All Stockists
Fragrance Profile
Gucci Pour Homme II (2007)
by Gucci
 |
|
main page
member reviews
community search
submit information
Gucci Pour Homme II Fragrance Notes
- Top Notes
- Bergamot, Violet Leaves.
Middle Notes- Pimento, Black Tea, Cinnamon.
Base Notes- Tobacco Leaves, Musk, Myrrh, Olive Wood.
Reviews of Gucci Pour Homme II
Showing 6 out of a total of 77 reviews
Show: 50 positive | 16 neutral | 11 negative
Add your review of Gucci Pour Homme II
   |  Oh my, what a handsome...bottle! It feels solid and heavy. Alas, the same cannot be said of this rather light-wearing scent. The opening act with bergamot and violet leaf is indeed bright and lovely, somewhat similar to that of Calvin Klein Man (also a 2007 release). But where Man goes all powdery with incense and amber, GUCCI POUR HOMME II gets drier and sharper, a lightly spiced tea leaf accord taking centerstage before the resinuous glow of myrrh alters the entire composition to something resembling GPH's cedar, only lighter. Maybe I expect a little more from Gucci but as much as I find GPH II versatile, it just doesn't excite me enough to want a decant, much less a full bottle.15 November 2009 |
 |  A lovely green composition of tea and spices. Practical, inoffensive and contemporary. I use it mostly on casual occasions. This is the last Gucci fragrance that makes sense to me. 28 August 2009 |
  | Ok did a near 180 on this. I originally thought it was very feminine but now its not that bad. Infact for some reason, I keep wanting to sample it everytime I see it. It is definately violety sweet, but not the powdery violet like Burberry Touch. Almost smells gourmand to me. Its modern and a bit dandy but nevertheless its a pretty unique scent. 01 August 2009 |
 | This is quite the welcoming fragrance, however not welcomed during summer. Versatile, minus the summer season unless of course it's a cool summer night. It's lifting, without being obnoxious. Safely sweet and romantic. If this is "Gucci Pour Homme II," then it must be the step brother of the original, because the two have no relation. It's a complete turn around, for the better. Gucci Pour Homme isn't bad, it's just on the mature side. 31 July 2009 |
  | This is a good effort by Gucci. Nothing groundbreaking here but GPH II manages to stand out quite a bit from the masses of fresh light masculines. What attracted me to GPH II is its versatility. Wearable in both winter and summer although i do feel this is more suited for summertime. Sillage is average and longevity is suprisingly good. 30 July 2009 |
  | I've been itching to get my hands on Gucci Pour Homme II for quite a while, so when I seen it at a local store for a good price, I bought it blind. A small error on my part... Gucci Pour Homme II smells quite nice with a combo of violets, tea, cinnamon and woods. Modern. It is also the weakest scent I have ever tried. 10+ spays = 0 sillage. It lasts for minutes, not hours on me. I'll plaster myself with this all summer to use it up. I give it a neutral because it does smell good but trust me, try before you buy. 09 July 2009 |
Show all 77 Gucci Pour Homme II reviews
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Gucci Pour Homme II products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Gucci Pour Homme II by Gucci that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Gucci Pour Homme II by Gucci from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
Report an Error
Twitter
Facebook
MySpace
Last.fm
All Editorial
