Login or
register to rate or review Givenchy Play Intense and access other features...
Fragrance Profile
Givenchy Play Intense (2008)
by Givenchy
Fragrance notes
Bergamot, Tangerine, Pink pepper, Vetiver, Tonka bean, Patchouli.
Reviews of Givenchy Play Intense
Showing all 5 reviews
Show: 2 positive | 1 neutral | 2 negative
Add your review of Givenchy Play Intense
 1049 reviews
|  I gave this recent release from Givenchy a run yesterday. Andrewthecologneguy had mentioned a 'tar note' which intrigued me greatly but my nose fail to detect any. Neither is 'tar' listed as a note. It is nevertheless pleasant in its sweet powdery yet airy essence; I find its approach is closer to Salvador Dali's Black Sun than it is to Armani edgier rendition with Code. But for the guys at Givenchy to jump on the trend bandwagon, they must be getting pretty desperate. Ultimately I find PLAY INTENSE's 'rip off'' act smacks too much of desperation that not even Justin Timberlake can bring sexy back. 15 September 2009 |
 141 reviews
|  Gave this one and the regular version a try yesterday. It comes off smelling like a gourmand, and the intense version even more so. The sales rep said that the regular and intense versions were made to complement each other, and you can put them both on at the same time to create a third fragrance. Thought it was a good concept, and I certainly wouldn't put the fragrance down just because it comes off smelling a bit synthetic. The intense version is much better than the regular in my opinion. 28 June 2009 |
 466 reviews
|  WOW, this is gooooood stuff! CoL, I am not sure if we smelled the same frag, but I was in love instantly with this one. As I mentioned in the review of Play, Play Intense combines elements of many fine frags. The opening is very similar to A*Men/Angel by Thierry Mugler, but also has some elements of Attitude by Armani. Then the TAR note shows up. If you are a fan of tar, you will absolutley love this. Some may get rubber, but for me it was tar. If you are familiar with Bvlgari Black, it is supposed to do the tar thing...but it doesn't quite deliver. Play Intense does...very clearly too. The tar note hung around for quite a while until the tonka bean/vanilla showed up in the base. Add patchouli and I smelled so deliciously manly that I could have eaten myself. The overall feel of the Play Intense is a modern day Versace Black Jeans. All the areas where Black Jeans might have been heavy handed or harsh, Play Intense does it gracefully, in a way only Givenchy could have done. I wouldn't bother with the regular Play unless you have a sensitive nose. Conclusion: if you are part of the Mugler A*Men/Angel crowd, and you enjoy coffee, chocolate, tar, tonka bean, vanilla, caramel and the likes, there is no reason why you will not absolutely love this. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! 18 October 2008 |
 9 reviews
|  Just had my first snif of the "PlayIntense"... very boring nothing attracting beside the model who is on ad...shame that it had good selection of ingredients 02 September 2008 |
 222 reviews
|  See my review of the standard Play and add some more coffee wood. AWFUL AWFUL AWFUL! 09 August 2008 |
Add your review
You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here
Related Givenchy Play Intense products on eBay
The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Givenchy Play Intense by Givenchy that you wish you share,
click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Givenchy Play Intense by Givenchy from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes