Azzaro Twin for Men (2009)
by Azzaro

I can't say Twin For Man is totally unpleasant but has a strong synthethic wood note throughout that makes it smell quite cheap. Said that, the whole fragrance is based on a apple / almond / nutmeg combination that is somehow pleasant and appealing. As the drydown occurs the woody note gets a bit too dominant and brings Twin For Man in the crowdy territory of the generic designer's fragrances. It smells cheap but, at least, it sells cheap too.

12nd June, 2011.

I like most azzaro fragrances but I have to say 'TWIN' is a total let down. there is a cheap synthetic berry smell and when inhaled causes my nose to burn -thats where it reminds me of a metallic scent.
There is also a summer flanker for this one 'twin summer'; Needless to say I bought both whilst on holiday untested ..........If you like black xs /1 million/calum then you will like this one

4th August, 2010.

Joey86 is spot on (an excellent review IMHO). I would add that there is a metallic quality in the opening too. Weired, maybe cutting edge? Certainly not of this time. Ginger and green apples don't mix well.

6th March, 2010.

How should i start with this hmmm

This scent dosent really stand out at all. It smells like what happens when you crush berries on your teak floor. The opening note suggests strongly of either blueberry or strawberry but i was quite surprised to find that it was green apple. But at the same time the top note smells exactly like 1 thing: a tube of fruity mentos candy. It's sweet, cloying and highly forgettable. It dries down to a woody accord.

I dont find it manly at all. If you want to smell like candy, go for this. Definitely not a turn on unless you're the type that goes for Joop! and Paco Rabone's Black XS and 1 Million.

9th September, 2009.

i love this fragance.. it smells so nice.. i think it smells a little like deseo for men by jlo, but much more well composed.. i love it.

2nd August, 2009.