Perfume Directory

Vitriol d'Oeillet (2011)
by Serge Lutens


Vitriol d'Oeillet information

Year of Launch2011
GenderShared / Unisex
AvailabilityIn Production
Average Rating
(based on 57 votes)

People and companies

HouseSerge Lutens
PerfumerChristopher Sheldrake
Parent CompanyShiseido

About Vitriol d'Oeillet

Vitriol d'Oeillet is a shared / unisex perfume by Serge Lutens. The scent was launched in 2011 and the fragrance was created by perfumer Christopher Sheldrake

Vitriol d'Oeillet fragrance notes

Reviews of Vitriol d'Oeillet

A mild thumbs up. Nothing problematic here. A light, wispy scent. Rather pleasant, and certainly nothing like the odd name suggests. Indeed, a better name would be "Rose en argent" -- (rose in silver) -- for that is what the scent suggests. The iris and carnation notes blend to create a light rose note. The scent is dry and airy. Peppery spices are subdued but keep things dry. There are light and breezy hints of wood, and an airy note which sometimes suggests mint and other times freshly-cut paper. This light style is unusual for traditional Serge Lutens, perhaps part of the nouvelle vague of that house.
15th December, 2015
I have a feeling this one gets overlooked because of the ho-hum reviews and lack of punch, which is understandable. There's nothing "vitrol" about's fairly tame in comparison with other spice-bombs. Also, carnation is tricky...many of us have associations with outdated perfumes, or even soapy-smelling cosmetic products.

Alas, Vitriol d'Oeillet is still a beautiful, dry, spiced-floral, relying heavily on ylang and rose to conjure the image of a proper carnation. I happen to find it very wearable and elegant, minimal in its details (a good thing), and a good candidate for any guys out there looking to dip their toes in the land of florals.

ps - irrelevant, but the colour of the juice is so perfectly matched to the scent, it's uncanny...
14th January, 2015
Genre: Floral

If, like me, the name “Vitriol d’Oeillet” had you dreaming of a transgressive floral successor to the brilliant Tubéreuse Criminelle, dream on. This isn’t all that vitriolic, and it’s not even much of an oeillet. In all fairness, I’m not sure how you’d do a convincing carnation soliflore with the current restrictions on eugenol. (The distinctively medicinal aromachemical common to cloves and carnation reconstructions.)

What Lutens delivers is not so much an angry carnation as a spicy-woody rose. That’s not a bad thing in itself; in fact it puts Vitriol d’Oeillet in the august company of Caron’s brilliant Parfum Sacré, Amouage Lyric Man/Woman, Czech & Speake’s No. 88, and Frédéric Malle’s Noir Epices. Vitriol d’Oeillet shares with most of these its notes of clove and black pepper, but its profile seems somehow less distinctive than any of them. It has neither the reckless intensity of Noir Epices, the exotic opulence of Parfum Sacré, nor the oudh and incense fueled mystery of the Amouage or Czech & Speake.

For a perfume house that made its reputation on bold, supersaturated compositions, Vitriol d’Oeillet smells oddly subdued. Indeed, the recent series of conventional – even apologetic – compositions, from Nuit de Cellophane and Bas de Soie to L’Eau Serge Lutens, leaves me wondering what’s become of the outfit that gave us Muscs Koublaï Khän, Ambre Sultan, Tubéreuse Criminelle, and La Myrrhe? This scent is pleasant and competent, but hardly likely to inspire passion, much less controversy. Meanwhile, for a convincing carnation soliflore, vitriolic or not, I’d aim for Comme des Garçons’ Series 2 Red: Carnation.
09th July, 2014
Female 1: 3.5/5, Impression: a little musky but clean and uplifting. Has a defining smell
Female 2: 3.5 /5, Impression: soapy, flowery, feminine aroma
Female 3: 0/5, Impression: Pompous. Does not suit you (which is me)
Male 1: 1/5, Impression: Too feminine and flowery
Male 2: 4/5, Impression: I like this one
Male 3: 3/5, Impression: a sweet but heavy floral scent
Projection: average +
Longevity: 10 h +
My opinion:
This is a mystery to me. There is definitely depth to it, but I’ve never understood this type of perfumes. It’s just like the Myrrh from the same creator. I love the house generally, but they do sometimes come up with these exceedingly abstract constructions. Luxurious soap and flower in an architectural excellence that does not speak to me. This is like a polished semi-precious stone ball on a dark velvet. Too round, somehow closed and detached. I usually prefer wilder, more angular and resonating fragrances.
This is slightly pompous, quietly proud aristocracy. And it’s really too feminine in my opinion.
Maybe if I could detect the peppers that are supposed to be there.
So, generally… respect but no attraction.
10th June, 2014
A peppery carnation with cloves is what I'm mainly picking up. What has been done to the carnation note, it can be really beautiful in a fragrance but here they have ruined it.

As time goes by other floral notes come into play making the main spicy peppery carnation smell like soapy bubblegum.

Thumbs down with this one.
24th May, 2014
Super harsh opening, pungent green notes, raw freshly-cut carnation flowers, a massive aldehydes feel, all in a trasparent, metallic, vibrant cloud, with a slightly sweet base. The carnation is powerful, vivid and biting, surrounded by spices (cloves and pepper) and a tasty, savoury bittersweet note of pimiento. The softer base of vanilla and ylang comes in shape and emerges as minutes pass, slowly turning the fragrance in a sweeter and almost slightly milky tanning cream-like scent (I recall Un bois vanille). The middle phase is basically a talcum-musky fairly pleasant and sweet take on the initial accord - meaning that it's still all there, just "emulsified" in a sweeter shape. The evolution is a bit odd and almost "sea-roving", it ranges from metallic to sweet than switching back to a dry green/floral, then ending back again to a musky sweet drydown, which eventually dries and settles in a discomforting floral/medicinal accord. And frankly I do not enjoy any of these passages in particular, it's like watching a movie with people yelling and moving in front of the screen – the movie is carnation and the rest is, well, all the rest that surrounds (or better say, covers) it here. Plus I don't get any "feeling" in particular - it's not refined, not pleasant, not "ironic", not evocative... not even shady or masculine or avant-garde. Not that it has to be some of these, it's just that it's more kind of a sequence of smells, none of which achieves any result in terms of identity. A bit too much, in a bit too much unclear concept. If you like carnation, you'd better go CdG's Carnation - an unbeatable quintessential tribute to this beautiful flower.

05th May, 2014

Add your review of Vitriol d'Oeillet

You need to be logged in to add a review

Shop for Vitriol d'Oeillet products online

Shop for Vitriol d'Oeillet at online perfumeries

Search Amazon for Vitriol d'Oeillet

Member images of Vitriol d'Oeillet

There are no member images of Vitriol d'Oeillet yet. Why not be the first?

You need to log in or register to upload images

Private Notes

You need to be logged in (or register here) to use Private Notes.



Features relating to Vitriol d'Oeillet