Tri-dimensional and Spiritual Perfumes

13th November, 2013

It is a mystery why modern men and women, so obsessed with erasing their own bodily smells, are nevertheless so attracted to the animal scents in perfumes that they will consistently prefer fragrances containing “animalic” ingredients to those made of purely botanical ingredients.

In times when these rare materials were still used in commercial perfumes, the purpose was first of all to get fragrances sold, and it worked so well that they were deemed indispensible in fine perfumery. Today, the use of animal scents is a very hard path to tread, because of prohibitive high prices, the difficulty of sourcing the materials and ethical dilemmas.

Apart from a few “politically incorrect” indie natural perfumers, the use of real animal ingredients has been abandoned. An interesting exception has been a French nose who rediscovered a strange south African animal raw material, Hyraceum.

Do you want to have “Dassie piss” (Hyaceum indigenous name) in your perfume? Buy the latest work by Duchaufour. Though I suspect that the very idea of spraying oneself with urine has as much to do with the success of the fragrance as the smell of the perfume itself. People think, “Yes, it is piss, but it is from Duchaufour. How chic. I can’t wait to try it…”

Still, our innate attraction to animal scents has deeper origins than the temptations of extreme scatological experiences: the origin is in our genes.

Why we need animal scent

Have you ever wondered why we like to have green plants and flowers in our homes? The reason is that their presence is necessary to our psychological and emotional balance. And the perfumes of aromatic plants can bring that presence into our lives even in the absence of the plants themselves, because perfumes are the singing voice of plants, their inner spirit.

The presence of animals around us is as necessary to our equilibrium as is the presence of plants. Whoever of us can afford it, does keep a pet at home, be it a dog, a cat, a bird, a mouse, a snake, a fish or a tortoise… watching animals, touching them and speaking to them is a need for us. Mankind has lived with domestic animals since its origins. The need for this relation is in our genes.

Have you noticed that children innately love the company of animals? This is because children are nearer to their innate nature than adults are. After all, many of us adults have acquired a pet only to please the desire of a child.

Just as with trees and flowers, the scents of animals can be a substitute for their presence even when we do not live among them, as most of us, in our modern, urban environment, do not. We have constructed lives cut off from the natural world; perfume is a way to restore the harmony we’re missing.

Our present search for scents, then, represents a new step in the history of mankind; it is a search for inner balance, for a message of beauty, expressed in the language of smells, and then translated into positive emotion. It is in this context that the use of animal scents can be understood; as a “perfume-therapy” – much as you would take vitamins if your diet was lacking them.

What are animal scents?

The animal scents traditionally used in perfumery, such as Castoreum, Civet, Hyraceum or Ambergris, are simply pheromones.

Pheromones are the “mother of all scents”. They have been devised by nature to be the first language of communication for living organisms, through their first developed perception organ, the chemical sense, which, for most creatures is the sense of smell.

Studying pheromones is fascinating, because it explains to us what we have in common with animals, and in doing so teaches us, too, of how we differ from them. It reveals to us that our humanity starts with our intellect, and that, unlike animals, we smell more with our brain than with our nose.

Understood more deeply and broadly, the scents of plants are botanical pheromone, they are the medium of communication and attraction between plants and insects, between plants and vertebrates, and even between plants and other plants, in a secret and mysterious way.

This explains why so many of them produce aromas whose molecules mimic animal and sometimes human pheromones: Cumin, for example, along with Sandalwood, Blackcurrant buds, Buchu, Vanilla, Cinnamon, Calamus, Iris root, Styrax, Clary sage, and many others.

When you know that pheromones are fundamental in the reproduction processes of all living species, you begin to have respect for them, to understand why we are so attracted to them, and of course to imagine what they can do to perfumes.

The power of their effect on us is also shown by the fact that long before they were used in perfumes, animal pheromones were used as medicines. In fact, they are present in all the traditional pharmacopeias.

Animal scents in Perfumes "tridimensional" perfumery

Most of us have come across one of those marvelous stereoscopic devices, the “View-Master”, through which one peers at two images taken from a slightly different angle. The result is a wonderful 3 D image of Venice, Rome or another exotic place.

In much the same way, a fragrance with a small amount of animal scent is generally preferred by the most people, because it creates an emotional dimension beyond that of a purely botanical one.

A fragrance made entirely of ingredients from plants meets only a part of our soul’s needs. Animal smells are the other, equally important part of our genetic olfactory memories. They are archetypes of considerable importance in the language of odors. A perfumer is but a story teller who writes with smells: imagine how few tales or fables could be written without the presence of animals.

This is why I call a perfume that contains both botanical and animal ingredients a three-dimensional perfume; for while there are only two images, they combine, just as the pictures in the stereoscope do, to create an extra emotional dimension. Without them both, the picture may be flat, the story may be too simplistic.

Substitutes for real animal scents, synthetic or vegetal such as ambrox or ambrette, may recall or imitate the "tridimensionality" – but then, so do regular photographs; but they are not as “real” as the vision of the “stereoscope”.

We love to live among flowers and trees, we need their presence so much that we bring them into our houses when they are absent in our streets. We do the same with pets. The lack of vegetal and of animal presence that is characteristic of modern city life is very new and unique to the story of mankind. This makes our need for a "three-dimensional" botanical and animal perfume all the more necessary to us.

Spirituality of perfume and animal scents

I learned in the East that perfume means spirituality and that love of perfumes springs from a quality of the soul. Oriental perfumery is an emanation of Eastern spirituality, a marriage between sacred and profane. In the spiritualities of the East, the physical and the spiritual, the sacred and the profane, are not conflicting as they are in our culture, but are rather complementary.

Perfume being part of spirituality in the East, oriental perfumery assumes the color of oriental spirituality, blending delicate flowers with austere resins, grounded on a base of animal scents.

In all religions, perfume has a privileged place. In Jewish mysticism, for example, all senses give pleasure to the body, except the sense of smell that give pleasure to the soul. But we should acknowledge that our western perfumery and the modern history of perfume started with the advent of Islam, when the use of perfume was taken away from the priests, healers and noblemen, and was enjoined upon every single person as a religious obligation and personal purification.

The encounter of Islam and Christianity in the medieval epoch brought the use of perfumes to the west.

The widespread use of animal scents in pre-chemical western perfumery is simply expressing the attraction and fascination that Eastern mystics have always exerted on us Western people. It writes the story of our thirst for a Unitarian spirituality that reconciles our humanity with our animality.

This is where animal scents fit in today’s natural perfumery, the essential message of a spiritual harmony that we crave.


To read more of Abdes Salaam Attar’s writings on animal extracts in perfumery, please visit

Next: The Lure and Licencing of using Animal Extracts

Previous: The Essence of Animals

Show all in series.





  • Share this

About the author: Abdes Salaam Attar

Abdes Salaam Attar is an artisan natural perfumer based in Italy. He posts on the Basenotes Forums under the username Profumo



Advertisement — comments are below


    • zatarain | 13th November 2013 23:10

      What is the referenced Duchaufour scent with Hyraceum? “Yes, it is piss, but it is from Duchaufour. How chic. I can’t wait to try it…” :D

    • iodine | 14th November 2013 08:45

      I guess he's referring to Séville ŕ l'Aube. Denyse Beaulieu writes in her book that she had received some Hyraceum from Abdessalam Attar and showed it to BD. I can't recall if he ended up using it really or using something else... Nor I can detect it in the scent!

      Interesting read, anyway, I hope that the Huddler content will come soon so we could read about the project on Hyraceum Abdessalaam is running with BNoters! :)

    • pluran | 14th November 2013 14:26

      Excellent. Thank you. Along with several other restricted ingredients, the lack of natural animalics is making it next to impossible to make a truly great perfume.

    • Profumo (article author) | 14th November 2013 19:34

      You are well informed Iodine, I believed that there is some Hyraveum in Seville a l'aube, as this was part of the story during the launch, but we should ask denyse. She participated into the making of the perfume.

    • zatarain | 14th November 2013 20:01

      Thank you iodine and Abdes Salaam Attar, I hope Denyse will provide the definitive answer! And thank you Abdes Salaam Attar for the interesting read.

    • ScentFan | 15th November 2013 19:20

      Thanks for this article. I especially enjoyed the idea of botanical and animal ingredients combining to produce a third dimension, that of emotion. This article helps explain why some of my perfume experiences are close to transcendent.

    • Fleurine | 18th November 2013 16:28

      Animal torture, exploitation, enslavement and cruelty do not smell good to me.

    • prosperonline | 19th November 2013 11:33

      As the Amaricans say this text made my day. So revealing. I must confess that I need plant and animals around me, and I also think as a human being, a superior mind, I am responsable for their well being, almost in a Hare Krishna way. By instinct I knew some of that information, who doesn't? But it is very nice to have one's beleives confirmed. wonderful article. Thanks a lot.

    • redrose | 19th November 2013 15:57

      If it's really subtle, I'm not sure I notice animalic scents in my frags. But I agree with Fleurine - I don't want any creature tortured or abused to enhance my scents, especially when there are such good substitutes available now. Besides, I live with cats, including a huge Maine Coon, and can smell them whenever I like (and even when I don't like!) ...

    • Profumo (article author) | 19th November 2013 18:20

      I agree with you.

      The massacre of muskdeer is a tragedy. being a lone territorial animal (not a herd one), when a mountaneer sees him, he knows that next mating season he will find him there so he comes back with a gun. There can be no justification for trading in muskdeer.

      Beaver Castoreum on the other hand is prospering too well in Canada because its natural predators have disappeared. Culling is a necessity least they invade human territories.

      Hyraceum is fossilised urine, and like Ambergris there is no ethical problem in using it.

      The torturing of Civets is long passed and the animals are kept by farmers better than their own children, as many european farmers of old kept their cows better than their kids.

      Billy Goat musk is taken from the animal without pain and with little disturb.

      Animal scents in perfumery do not mean necessarily torturing and senseless Killing, except for muskdeer, I repeat it, whose use can find no justification at all. One may read my report on Kashmiri muskdeer in order to understand the real situation.

    • pluran | 19th November 2013 22:16

      For the people worried about it: The natural animalic ingredients in question can be obtained without hurting animals. I don't think anyone here wants to promote something that will hurt animals.

    • Renegade | 21st November 2013 01:32

      Profumo, did you read the last paragraph of Bruce Bolmes' article in this series? I would be interested to hear your thoughts on it.

    • Profumo (article author) | 21st November 2013 08:56

      I red it and this is why I have posted the link to my report on Kashmiri muskdeer.

      The story of culling herds of muskdeer in order to justify their Killing is false.

      There can be no ethical justification for using muskdeer in perfumery.

      When muskdeer has disappeared from the planet, who will bring it back?

    • lpp | 21st November 2013 10:04

      Peter Singer writes interestingly on the subject of 'speciesism'.

    • Profumo (article author) | 21st November 2013 11:26

      can you send us a link to some of these writings?

    • zatarain | 21st November 2013 20:35

      When someone can explain how using an animal's fossilized urine or other expelled waste harms the animal, then I will consider the absolutist approach and putative morality.

    • zatarain | 21st November 2013 20:55

      That I do not approve of. I do not know how commonplace that is. Profumo, who is better informed than I am, says that this is no longer commonplace and that civets enjoy better quarters nowadays. Also, it is not their feces, but a secretion from their perineal glands. I don't imagine that the act of collecting it is more intrusive on the animal than trimming matted hair from a pet's rear, and probably less of a bother to the animal than trimming a pet's toenails.

      An aside, to the best of my limited knowledge, most or all of the fragrances I know of that contain a civet note are created using synthetic civet, just as most other animalic notes are synthesized nowadays.

      While there is plenty of argument about whether the synthetics create fragrances as compelling as those that use natural ingredients, I believe the central point that I took from the article, that people are comforted by animal smells, is still true.

      Perhaps we will eventually see labeling, as on some other beauty products, saying "this product is cruelty-free".

      Edit: I see you edited your post. You seem to have a very low opinion of perfumers, why? Also, if you read the article, he states near the beginning "Apart from a few “politically incorrect” indie natural perfumers, the use of real animal ingredients has been abandoned. An interesting exception has been a French nose who rediscovered a strange south African animal raw material, Hyraceum."

      There is nothing in the article to suggest advocacy for mistreatment of animals. It's about the effects of their scent.

    • Fleurine | 21st November 2013 21:18

      I don't have an especially low opinion of perfumers, actually it's higher for them than for many people. It's that it is nearly impossible to overestimate the amount animal cruelty/torture/exploitation involved in producing so much of what we consume. Animals have no voice and they have no choice. We have both. They are not ingredients. They are sentient beings with feelings, and thoughts and families.

    • Profumo (article author) | 21st November 2013 21:33

      Thank you Fleurine for bringing a little bit of pepper into this conversation. We understood that you are vegan and we respect that.

      - - - Updated - - -

      Most people eat meat daily without being aware that the animals they eat have been treated as things, have been denied all their rights with the only intent to transform them into money making goods. The same happens with the plants we eat and now we are arriving to an epoch in which the same is happening to human beings.

      The situation of dishumanity rather than of cruelty, towards animals, exploited industrially, is the same as that of the botanical world under our control, and the situation of these two is but a parabol for what is today happening to people. Dishumanisation of humanity, People been transformed into tax payers whose only reason to exist is to feed the financial system as wood feeds the fire.

    • Fleurine | 21st November 2013 21:51

      I never used to hear about *the feelings* of plants until I became vegan. Now I hear about them every day.

      I agree however, with much of what you wrote. I do believe we are in A Dark Age, but much can change for the better. And quickly.