This is only half a review as I couldn't wear this for more than 20 minutes.
The opening and heart are too much for me -- like sour booze with a slug of ginger - made my eyes water.
For all I know, the drydown may be lovely, but I will let others find that out.
This is about the fifth time I have tried this. I thought I might stumble into a wonderful batch.
MI just doesn't work for me. The opening accord tanks imo -- sweet and saline jut means hissy in my book.
The drydown is ok and lasts a fair while on me, but this overriding salty screechiness just won't go away and it comes across as just too synthetic.
So wrapped up in the wonder of Cuiron then and now, I never gave the original EDP much of a look in.
The re-issue is just wonderful in a powdery, musky, ambery type way.
Think of a cranked up Ambrette 9 with a touch of spice.
A must have imo.
I love these sort of vetivers -- fresh, bracing, full of life. Almost the complete antithesis of the Tauer and MPG versions.
Second only to the Lubin vetiver and reasonably priced, it has a lovely long lasting drydown.
I am not sure who this is aimed at but the top notes almost floored me.
There is just too much going on and seems like an exercise in bombast.
Ylang, clove, violet -- in nuclear proportions.
Not for me, but worth seeking out just to try.
Austere packaging (nice) hides an unexpectedly rich, clean fragrance, especially in the opening, which is fresh and floral. This soon gives way to a sort of soapy mix of vanilla and a woody type musk. Not what I call a 'serious' fragrance, but it sure is comforting.
I agree with the 'aromatic' label here rather than a 'citrus'. The rose and jasmine create a wonderful accord which surprisingly lasts a very long time. Slightly veers towards a 'feminine' but not enough for me to worry about it. The EDP is much better than the original imo.
Versatile and gorgeous.
The problem with Oud is that like Immortelle, when used in any appreciable amount it tends to dominate the whole fragrance. I was hoping that Guerlain would create a sandalwood to die for, matching the now long gone 'Sandalwood' by Floris. That fragrance used Mysore when it was relatively cheap and not subject to restrictions so I can't blame Guerlain entirely for this rendition. Marrying it with oud wasn't going to work for pure sandalwood lovers though.
'Oud Royal' would have been a better less misleading name imo.
The fragrance itself is lovely though -rich, resinous, fruity, long lasting and gloriously smooth.
Love the Black Bee bottle.
This is an Italian House based in Padova. All 5 fragrances (A.V.E.R.Y.)are very nice indeed. They come in 30ml only and are 'Pure Parfum'.
I'm surprised looking at the notes as 'A' strikes me as fundamentally 'woody'.
It's like a combination of the best ever 'woods' from CDG and a superior version of Suzanne Lang's Tamboki Wood.
'A' is find of the year so far for me and the smell is highly addictive. Pricy for just 30ml though.
I can't believe it. This isn't too bad imo. 100% better than the original, but even that isn't a full recommendation.
I like the opening which is a little unusual citrusy and spicy mix.
The coffee accord works pretty well and there is a general smokiness about the base.
Tobacco Vanille it aint but it has good strength.
Zero marks for originality and very badly made. Honeydew Melon equals a general sweetness is all.
Top marks for projection and longevity though.
Isn't that always the way?
A brutish loud semi-aquatic with pretensions of being a fougere.
Just what the fragrance world needs.
I'm in sort of two minds about this. On the one hand, it's a very masculine take on cedarwood and lasts for ever. On the other, it's very linear (apart from the very brief opening citric blast)with the cedar only marginally tempered by some herbs. I can't help feeling it would have sold very well to middle-aged men in the 1970's.
I like the fragrance and the name but probably won't be reaching for it too often.
Very nostalgic for some though.
After the wonderful opening, I detect a steeliness (almost metallic) in the drydown. It must be the musk.
Spoils it completely for me.
In the Guerlain and Lubin mould of vetiver, which is the type I prefer. Perfectly nice alternative but I prefer Le Vetiver. Good strength and longevity.
If you like the smell of freshly dug up vetiver and can live with it for 8 hours or more -- this is for you.
Grapefruit and mint are fleeting at best.
Very expensive and sort of boring. Not a good combination.
This is gorgeous and has to be a 'semi-gourmand' at least. If you put your nose to this in a dessert bowl, you'd want to eat it immediately.
All my jaded nose can detect is a wonderful accord of amber over caramel with lashings of Tonka in the base.
It sounds heavy but it has been created (somehow) to open itself out in an almost fresh way. The sweetness is certainly there but perfectly tolerable.
Strangely masculine in my opinion and a must have. Also, firmly rooted in Dior Homme's lineage.
Btw -- The whole line has increased in price by over 30% in about 18 months (why?)
Fougeres always smell dated to me and I think -- do I really want to smell like this again?
Well, think of a superior flanker to Rive Gauche with a touch of smokiness added. It's irresistible.
Firstly , this collection isn't strictly all 'aquatics' -- it's more Le Ciel et Le Mer and the 'space between them'. Jangala is supposed to represent facets of the steamy Indonesian jungle from morning to night. It has a lovely lush opening of eucalyptus and coconut which is wholly intoxicating and lasts a good while. The drydown is less fabulous and actually reminds me , at times, of Mont Blanc's Presence. Still, I felt I needed to have this so it has to be a thumbs up.
This reminds me very much of the Farmacia SS fragrance -- I think it's called Hale.
Basically, you have to like the smell of salt around you all day to appreciate this. Very sharp and tangy which doesn't really let up until a softer musk kicks in very late on. A thumbs up for not compromising, but a slightly challenging wear.
Does blueberry, blackcurrant and rose equate to grapefruit? That's what I get anyway. Cocoa in the base? What?
A zingy grapefruit that eventually becomes more floral, but not feminine to my nose. Amazing tenacity. I love it.
I think this smells gorgeous and sexy in a 'beach' type way. Can't imagine wearing this outside of summer though which obviously restricts it's use. Not sure I want to pay the ridiculous price of it -- if MIN had reduced the egregious packaging they might have been able to do the same with the cost. Still, coconuts, orange and salty notes -- Yum.
Woof! Hello Nursey!
Ultra masculine -- think of a cranked up hybrid of Derby, Tuscany and vintage Givenchy and add some 'extreme' woods
In the style of Jicky and MdM --a fusty, dusty men's fragrance with lavender and amber prominent throughout. For me, there is some note clashing and it strikes me as a little rough round the edges. It lasts a very long time and the drydown isn't half bad. When does 'vintage' become 'dated'?
Seems to me to be a completely superfluous flanker that doesn't really improve on the original or the other flankers.
Maybe the word 'Intense' sells?
I don't really like the violet notes used here , but the cedar and vetiver drydown is totally acceptable and wearable.
Rather than the intense moniker given, it all seems a bit predictable and tame.
Horrible blue liquid that smells of mint mouthwash.
Not a patch on Roadster
The first 20-30 seconds of Icon are lovely -- a very nice bergamot.
Then, for me, it all falls apart very badly. I am not sure what accord is causing this overriding smell of a rather sweet orangey bubblegum, but that is what I perceive. I actually can't detect any of the base notes listed.
This is where Dunhill and I part company for good
For pre-pubescent youths only.
Apart from a hint of the original, this is your basic fresh summery citrus offering from Dior. The iris is muted imo.
It's perfectly wearable and lasts a very long time, but it disappointly crashes into the unoriginal and predictable woody finish.
It's a bit flat really, which isn't ideal for a summer scent and a little lazy.
I will wear occasionally though
I hate the smell of whisky -- Pure Malt does not smell of it.
It does smell of malt , hops and wood though.
If you can overlook the ridiculous claims (fermented in oak casks?) and horrific bottle / spray mechanism -- what you have is one of the 'best bangs for the buck' fragrance ever.
Yes -- not a normal type 'Nasomatto' unlike Boccanera from the same line.
You'd thing 'Brutus' would be an out and out 'masculine' but it's really quite sweet and restrained. Deadidol has listed a lot of notes that I don't detect at all -- cumin? patchouli? -- what I do get is a 'tropical' fruity type orange blossom with a sweet musky finish. However, there is something unidentifiably woody in the base which keeps it very non-fem.
I like it very much, with one caveat -- it doesn't smell as expensive as it actually costs.