Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › 1826 by Histoire de Parfums, 2001

1826 by Histoire de Parfums, 2001

89% Positive Reviews
Rated #4445 in Fragrances

Posted
If the scent of someone who doesnt have to try too hard you know the kind, blessed with charm, good looks and unearned wealth (the bastards!) could be bottled, this may be it. It seems to be effortlessly graceful without striking affected poses. Soft-focus in feel, the blonde wood notes are rounded and supple, the musks (although listed as the dreaded white musks) are airy but gratifyingly luxurious, the patchouli is a silken murmur, little glints of anise (a note I have a very low tolerance for) pop up like flecks of white nougat, a barely there gingery spice brings a trace of angelic perspiration to the brow: the whole is poised and natural seeming. The trail is modest, but its kind of hard to see this working at a more amped-up level. Suffers from that plague of modern perfumery which is so prevalent it seems barely worth mentioning Drydown Dulldown. Here after a couple of hours, 1826 turns into a pleasant but nondescript woody musk all the funs been had.

Posted
I dabbed this on before watching the first episide of season 4 of the Tudors, so pardon my references. This is the episode where Kathryn Howard comes to court as Queen, and we the viewers get to see lots of bedroom activity.

Now I paid attention to this era in history class, so i know that King Henry was a fat old diabetic with an ulcer that stunk up the entire castle. I also know these folks didn't bathe, so how on earth where they able to 'get romantic'?

With this I approach 1826. Yes, it's a few centuries later, but the concept is still there. This is what I imagine those bodices smelled like, and I don't say that with a nod of praise. There is the strong musky note, aka the perspiration- saturated linen undergarment. This is covered up by frequent visits to the powder room, where a handful of white florals are smashed and rubbed all over the bosom. Picture yourself standing in one of those big rooms on a hot summers night; the windows are open to let in a stale breeze, and everyone is fanning their body odor about with a feathered fan scented with incense and patchouli taken from the peasant's church.

Sound good? Then give this a try. Sound like it would rub your bodice the wrong way? Then move on.

Posted
1826 was inspired by Eugénie de Montijo, the last Empress of France - a beautiful intelligent woman of impeccable taste who apparently loved patchouli. In fact, within seconds of opening, the patchouli makes its presence known, turning sweet bergamot into something decidely darker and hippie-ish, until a violet note heralds the arrival of some white flowers to provide a brighter contrast. Unlike the others I have tried from this house, 1826's progression seems rapid, frantic even, the classic 3-tiered structure completely ignored. It's almost like a Royal Rumble, with notes of incense, patchouli, amber, ginger, vanilla, etc wrestling with one other for a shot at the title, and tumbling in and out of the 'ring'. And the winner? You. For this is indeed a fun, playful scent that doesn't seem to take itself too seriously.

Posted
The opening of 1826 is a sweetened Bergamot which after the first few seconds is joined by patchouli. There is a nice spiciness to the heart notes that tames the florals and patchouli but that is so well integrated into the fragrance that it doesn't smell spicy. The amber and incense start poking through at about 20 minutes but like the spices in the heart notes these notes are integrated to work with the other notes to give them depth and character. After about 2 hours is when I get the most amber, a slightly dirty amber that doesn't seem too vanillic or sweet. On my skin it fades from existence after about 4 or 5 hours leaving only the slightest hint of perfume on the skin. This sticks fairly close to the skin and has very little sillage. I think this is more unisex in character than feminine as and such is worth checking out if you are into patchouli or amber frags.

Posted
I seriously can't fathom how a perfume that smells like My Little Ponies and cheap sandalwood fans has got anything to do with an obscure 19th century empress. Marketers need to get a grip.

A plastic peach-strawberry opening gives way to sandalwood and a bit of incense, and that's it. This is a scent for delusional socially-awkward types who still dream of turning into Disney Princess swans.

Posted
The notes I have for 1826 are somewhat different than those posted in the review, below. These are the notes on the new bottle (pardon my bad French):

Top: Bergamot, Mandarin
Mid: White Flowers, Violette, 'Gingerbre', 'Cannelle'
Base: Patchouli, Amber, Incense, 'Bois Blondes', White Musk, Vanilla

As I've worked my way through the Histoires line, I've come to realize that the published notes are only indicative of what you'll actually experience, and they do not represent the actual order in which you will smell them. The Noir Patchouli should really be called 'Noir Rose' because the patchouli topnotes are fleeting and it's all about the rose. People should not think these are historical recreations - rather, this line has chosen historical figures as catchy associations with their fragrances (the way Etat Libre has done with sexual innuendos).

1826 would have been more appropriate to have patchouli in the name, because although it's a published basenote, it's a primary note to the fragrance structure and is apparent from top to base. The top is a pretty - but not delicate - citrus tempered with rose and other florals. Patchouli makes an entrance fairly quickly after the opening and becomes more prominent as the fragrance progresses. Patchouli is joined by what I believe to be violet (or other slightly pungent florals) in the heart. I like the composition's balance - it is never too sweet, too floral, or too citrusy, yet there is a brightness that highlights all of these aspects.

Unfortunately, by the time the base establishes itself (3 hours), the fragrance has run out of steam. There is a musky patchouli, rose, and some mild woody notes poking through, but it fades quickly from this point. I get none of the amber, incense, or vanilla per the published notes, though perhaps they are simply part of the composition and not distinct. The longevity is surprisingly short compared to 1969 Parfum de Revolte and 1740 Marquis de Sade, which both lasted 12 hours or more on my skin.

Even with the average longevity 1826 is a fun fragrance - if I had to categorize I'd say it's a 'patchouli/citrus/floral'. Good stuff.

Posted
Not a bad fragrance, merely not what I would associate with historical recreations. It is strawberry and coconut on a woody base, pleasant enough, but I associate that with the synthetic strawberries that were all the rage in the 1970s.

Posted
On the website of Histoire de Parfums they write about the notes of 1826: "Encompassing fruity nuances with a tropical twist, this eau de parfum opens with notes of corsican Peach, strawberry and Tahitian coconut. The middle notes are an harmonious blend of a beautiful white flower bouquet, tinged with orange blossom, Egyptian jasmine, and Bulgarian rose. Finally, Balsam and Wood notes round out the feeling with incense, vanilla, cacao and benzoin blended with patchouli, cedar and sandalwood."

I smell mostly the white flower bouquet with a strong spicy noto on a woody base. Not being a big fan of flowery fragrances I like this one because it's not overly sweet and the flower notes are nicely balanced by the spices and the wood.
1826 by Histoire de Parfums, 2001
Description:

Details:
DetailValue
Launched Date2001
GenderNeutral
AvailabilityIn Production
ByHistoire de Parfums
Base Notes
Bottle Designer
Middle Notes
Perfumer
Top Notes
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Start a guide on 1826 by Histoire de Parfums, 2001!
Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › 1826 by Histoire de Parfums, 2001