Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Francesco Smalto Pour Homme by Francesco Smalto, 1987

Francesco Smalto Pour Homme by Francesco Smalto, 1987

93% Positive Reviews
Rated #343 in Fragrances

Posted
very strong. not for the timid and weak. powerhouse of the 80's. no elegance, just a bunch of mixed up notes with really no direction. i gave it to my dad as he will wear anything.

Posted
This is great, it get complements, it smells mature but awesome, it last and it projects. And the best: it is exclusive, not everybody own this so this is great for signature scent.

Posted
I bought two 100ml bottles like 1.5 year ago of this old 80's powerhouse due to all reviews I read, not being able to test it. It was not in vain as I really love the stuff! Ubermasculanity in a bottle! This juice really rocks and contains all powerhouse qualities! It's macho, dark, smokey, leathery, ubermasculine, strong, lasting and projecting! Most powerhouses don't have all these qualities as Shamu points out correctly as they are mostly not smokey and this dark! (assuming the brilliant Tsar is no powerhouse) The opening is a mix of lavender, flowers and leather mixed with anise. The anise seems odd but makes this dry fragrance smell pretty different than any other powerhouse I can think of. The anise complements the other masculine notes during opening and smokey heart stage and disappears when the drydown sets in. The drydown which is pretty soft compared to the first 1.5 hour of the opening and heart goes on for many hours lingering around and never seem to leave you which makes it a pretty long lasting fragrance. The drydown is also still a little smokey with some masculine stuff going on. lots of patchouli, leather and oakmoss are the key players there which keep it dark. As ericrico pointed out there is no freshness at all in this scent but just brilliant boldness in a bottle! To be used in fall/winter only! Longevity is 8+ hrs and sillage above average first two hours and average to close last 6-8 hrs of its long life time. Thumbs way up! Rated: 9/10

Posted
When I first bought this fragrance, it was very "smoky" smelling. It was nice at first, but then a half hour later, a very masculine, almost sweat-like scent started to emerge. I know it couldn't have been me because I had just showered prior to applying the fragrance. It wasn't a bad-smelling sweat-like scent, but, in fact, a rather masculine and "manly" smell, I suppose something that would turn on women, and most likely some men, too. I definitely would buy this fragrance again, as I place it in my top 20 fragrances. Too bad this "man juice" has been discontinued. It's manhood in a bottle. I must honestly say when I first smelled it, it got me aroused (in a sexual way) and I had to leave the cologne counter quickly in an effort not to be embarrassed by what was about to be VERY obvious. Yes, it had THAT kind of effect on me. Luckily, I still own 3 bottles!

Posted
I was a little hesitant at first to buy this - although I am a powerhouse and aromatic fougere lover, I was worried it would be overly-done or perhaps a shadow of another scent. I was also concerned if the bottle I got was a good one as there are threads on other forums of cheap (possible immitation) bottles. I got the real juice from a reliable source and have very serious affection for this fragrance - excellent & MACHO! Shamu nails this - I got hit with the smoky opening full of rich artemisia and florals (similar to a Drakkar Noir base but with added smoke), which sort of floored me...in a good way. It is not as tarry as Jacomo de Jacomo (which can be over the top for me) as the smoke blends very nicely into this - it is not over-the-top, but well-integrated. I would have to say that it is an Aromatic Fougere with a lot of leather, lavender, moss, patchouli, musk and other green/floral scents. The citrus is minimal - this is a rugged scent, not "fresh" - but in your face macho. It is not the tough guy at the bar - it is the bouncer who will throw him out! I recently have reviewed the reformulation of Drakkar Noir and feel it is very good (lighter than before). Ironically, this is like Drakkar Noir "Black" - ;-) ! The notes are very well-blended here...impressively so. The smoke stays, but other florals come forward and the fresh top green artemisia (which is a key ingredient in DN as well) keeps this from becoming dank or musty. This is the perfect smoker's fragrance...and yet there is no tobacco note. Apart from Drakkar Noir, I would have to say that this is actually fairly unique. It doesn't remind me of Azzaro Pour Homme (neither vintage or current formulation) - as I don't get a strong anise note from this (although it is mentioned). It is far too green and floral - I do get a hint of tarragon and some nice rosemary, so herbal indeed. I have a large collection of Aromatic Fougeres and this one just found a home in my rotation! Excellent. Throw my hat into the ring of really, really like - damn near love. I am curious for a full-wearing of this, but I can tell it is a powerhouse. For now, I give it a solid and respectable 8+/10 and a recommendation to buy (I have worn the latest Drakkar Noir several times lately and increased my rating to 7.5+/10 - I would say they are very close, but slight nod to Francesco Smalto Pour Homme for the depth and not reformulated that I can tell). I would reach for DN to be less-offensive/daytime scent. This bottle to hang out, evenings and just to feel I got a bigger pair. Great bottle of juice and only to be worn by men, not boys.

Posted
This late-eighties gem stands out from the powerhouse crowd with its smoky, oily quality which underpins the fragrance from the breathtaking first blast to the smooth, mellow drydown. The strong, herbal opening is very pleasing with a prominent lavender accord which balances out the smokiness. In time the floral heart shines through and the fragrance becomes deeper, fuller and the leather moves to the front, albeit a rougher, oilier leather than found in the likes of Trussardi or Aramis, and the patchouli emerges also. The drydown is lovely, mossy-leather with the ever present smokiness now much subdued. There's plenty going on here - this is not a one-dimensional beast. Sure, it is a heavy-hitter and lasts 12hrs+ with ease but it's a shapeshifter and there are suprises in every sniff. Absolutely wonderful - a firm favourite.

Posted
Powerful soapy lavender and a "meaty," leathery quality to begin with, but it doesn't really go anywhere special, and there are so many others I'd rather wear instead. One that is still reasonably priced is Montana Parfum d'Homme (in the red box), which I find far superior in every way. I had an old bottle that lost it's top notes, so beware of this possibility, though it's more wearable that way. It is natural smelling and I could almost imagine this one being worn by those who use it as a kind of aromatherapy treatment, perhaps if one is getting ready for an "ultimate fighting" match. Clearly, it's the antithesis of the fresh/aquatic type of fragrance.

Posted
Francesco Smalto pour Homme is a fantastic 1980's powerhouse fougere. It is almost as dry as Yatagan, although it smells nothing like Yatagan whatsoever. The opening is strong - a spicy, smokey lavender/leather combination with a touch of anise (the only seemingly "sweet note" during the entire development). This becomes a very nicely balanced fragrance once the initial olfactory onslaught mellows. After about an hour, the anise seems to be gone but the smokey leather is still there with the lavender coming through more distinctly, along with only a hint of some very dry florals. By the four hour plus mark, the lavender is at its finest (really nice!), the smokiness has faded, and I detect predominantly leather with some oakmoss in the basenotes. This is a wonderfully masculine fragrance, and anyone that enjoys Quorum and Azzaro pour Homme is sure to enjoy Francesco Smalto pour Homme! This is without a doubt one of my all-time personal favorite fragrances.

Posted
Released back in 1987, this fragrance must have felt like a blast from the past at the time, because it has more in common with the powerhouse fougeres of the 1970s than the power chypres of the 80s. It pins the needle on the macho meter. It is shamelessly and unapologetically masculine, cast from the same mold as Azzaro Pour Homme, Jacomo de Jacomo and Calvin.

The opening and heart accords are very woody and spicy, with a dark smoke note lurking underneath. This is where I see a lot of similarity to Jacomo de Jacomo, though Smalto is more assertive. Im surprised the pyramid doesnt mention sandalwood in the mix, because it smells like sandalwood to me that is providing the woody spiciness in the first hour or two. However, I am probably misinterpreting this note, which is probably anise. Smalto dries down to a very dark leather accord, and it gives this scent a strange, oily glow. Very nicely done.

If youre looking for an androgynous, gender-neutral scent to wear, this is definitely not it. Like its brethren Quorum and Paco Rabanne, Francesco Smalto is a strong macho man fragrance.

Big thumbs up for this powerhouse.

Posted

Francesco Smalto Pour Homme opens on a fresh note slightly green, somewhat citric, more aromatic than green-herbal: Its a nice opening but I personally dont care for the anise note that, to me, muddies up the freshness of the opening a bit. The opening is an interesting accord, though it is rustic, masculine, and discreet actually quite unique. In the heart notes, the aromatics grow somewhat stronger, moving into a true herbal / green richer than the opening, but retaining discretion and centered in a soft smoky ambiance. The dry down is an example of a genuine rustic fougere: moss, hay and leather. I love the hay note, and although I usually dont like leather in a fragrance, the leather here seems to work okay for me. This was once my favorite fragrance, and after all these years, I still find it interesting and I wear it once in a while. It is ultra-masculine, and it performs well on the skin with very good longevity. (Edit of 04 October 2005 review. Changed from a thumbs up.)


Francesco Smalto Pour Homme by Francesco Smalto, 1987
Description:

Details:
DetailValue
Top NotesLavender, Bergamot, Tarragon, Neroli, Anise, Rosemary
Middle NotesGeranium, Fern, Carnation, Cedar, Patchouli, Cyclamen
Base NotesOakmoss, Amber, Tonka, Musk, Leather
Launched Date1987
GenderMen
AvailabilityDiscontinued
ByFrancesco Smalto
Bottle Designer
Perfumer
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Start a guide on Francesco Smalto Pour Homme by Francesco Smalto, 1987!
Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Francesco Smalto Pour Homme by Francesco Smalto, 1987