Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974

Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974

Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974
100% Positive Reviews
Rated #997 in Fragrances

Posted
Futur was marketed as avant-garde at its release in the late 1960s, an era known for its conviction that the future was more about style than science. In the 60s, the future was in fact the 1960s with sleeker fashion, poses and objets (rayguns and cocktail glasses). Smelled in the present, the revived Futur can be considered a bit retro not because it smells tired, but because the green floral didnt so much evolve as (with a few exceptions) become extinct. Futurs points of direct comparison are this handful of extant green florals from the 1960s-1970s: Chamade, Metal, Silences, Weil de Weil, No 19, Alliage and especially Private Collection. (Im not going to stare into the abyss of attempting to distinguish the green floral from the green chypre.) Niche perfumery has produced a few examples of the style since the late 1960s, but mainstream perfumery has more or less dropped it. The green floral might appear out of step with current trends in mainstream perfumery, but Robert Piguet are smart to include it in their line. It is comparable in archival tone to Fracas and Bandit, and like these two, smartly encapsulates a genre. Additionally, as a well composed melodious floral it fits in with more recent releases from Piguet such as Douglas Hannant and Petit Fracas. It is also composed by Arelien Guichard, the perfumer responsible for the recent spate of new RP releases (Casbah, Mademoiselle Piguet, etc.). Futur is a beautiful green floral. It reminds me that green florals can capture beauty, complexity, and intrigue in ways that mixed white florals aspire to and fruity forals dont even attempt. Green florals are alluring, and Futur is no exception. It has a bright-eyed composure and doesnt come off as heavily coiffed and made up as Private Collection and Chamade do. Its not as stagey as Metal. Informal, but not slack Futur has a simple chic to it. It shows an astute abstraction in the composition that makes it one of the black-box perfumes. You can see into it whatever you please, and as a result, it works in most any context.

Posted
(Current version) A wonderful green chypre. As others have pointed out, Futur emphasizes both aspects of the genre. It is both very dark, vegetal, mossy, and very soapy. On paper, I had the impression that it became in fact too soapy, but on my skin, it maintains a good balance. Both more vegetal and more soapy than Givenchy III vintage, cleaner and less haughty than Cristalle, greener and more synthetic than Ormonde Jayne Tiare.

Posted
I see others drawing comparisons, so I'll contribute mine. The drydownanisic herb, clary sage, muguet, & ylang-ylang are what persist for meis identical to vintage Antilope, tho a bit weaker in strength and longevity. Nonetheless, it answers my burning question: can I find that drydown in a still-in-production fragrance? For now, the answer isyes! Good to know.

Posted
Identical to the classic Madame Rochas! Oh, yes - sprayed about on body parts on five occasions with scent experts present to evaluate. These scents are identical as being, in my estimation, the very best floral melange in perfume history. So, since I am dealing with the "new formulation," who is copying whom? Original Rochas 1960 - reformulated 1989 Piguet formulated 1974 Do try samples of both - buy whatever your budget can afford- they are both, being identical - are DVINE!

Posted
I don't know why I like Futur but I do. I have never smelled the original but the new version is oddly old-fashioned. As a matter of fact, Futur has a pre-WWII flavour to it although it was first issued in 1974. To me, this is most certainly not a bad thing since I simply adore classic fragrances. Strangely enough, I can smell aldehydes in the composition even though there is none mentioned in the olfactive pyramid. Top notes: Bergamot, neroli, green accords Heart notes: Violet, jasmine, ylang-ylang Base notes: Vetiver, patchouli, Virginia cedar In some ways, Futur is reminiscent of Bandit. It's no wonder since they share the bergamot, neroli, violet, jasmine, ylang-ylang, vetiver and patchouli notes. The smokey leather note has been replaced with a pleasantly soapy note which becomes a little woodier in the dry-down. Here, they have marketed Futur as a shared fragrance. To me, though, Futur is chiefly a feminine fragrance.

Posted
Off Scenter and the others described well the facets of the smell and the evolution itself. This is an unisex herbal dark chypre (with a sophisticated floral soul) coming from the abysses of the past but recently reformulated and obviously updated.  In its perfect combination of herbal sharpness and woodsy darkness, water and night, old-fashion and modern, transparence and density this  green-slightly incensed fragrance  strikes out as a typical Piquet as many others had to affirm relatively to its resemblance with Bandit (a Bandit without Birch Tar and with less leather and pungency, that's right). Greens, citruses, ylang-ylang, incense and patchouli imprint a sort of old-fashion aura. The opening under my nose is made of bitter herbs, hesperides (a starring bergamot and orange) and aldehydes and turns out pungent, boisterous and aromatic, than the smell starts to go gentler, with a touch of nocturnal flowes (i smell the violet) and darkens with an obscure blend of olibanum, patchouli and labdanum that is dark-green, incensed, woodsy, bitter-spicy and sweetly leathery. Some balsams have been added to the woodsy incense and are assigned to smooth the rootness, doing it finally in a clever way. The fragrance ends with tamed base of cedarwood and vetiver. The others talk about soapiness, i think just that the herbs, the patchouli and the citrus lose in the time the angular temperament that turns out slightly tamed but basically the fragrance remains humid, earthy and floral. A stark fragrance with a serious, introspective but autoritative temperament.

Posted
Extreme green. Imagine Bandit without leather and you will get an idea. Bitter, floral/green, extremely soapy throughout and tremendously contemporary. Futur, with its pushed to the limit aldehydic "cleanness" stays somehow halfway between Givenchy III and Comme Des Garcons for Stephen Jones. A bizarre blend that's appearantly inoffensive yet extremely misterious. A great perfume! Downside: Lasting Power (no more than 3 hrs).

Posted
This reblend feels a bit like the link between Bandit and Cravache. (oddly, there appear to be few shared notes) All that great piquant opening but with a decidedly clean, green feel about it-what a contradiction! There is just enough of a spicy warmth to keep it from being decidedly fresh or citrusy. I agree with Off-Scenter that the drydown is soapy, and I can see where he gets a woodiness, but on me, there is more of waxy quality. I would relate it to a citronella candle with a slightly pungent soap quality. Ultimately, it is more masculine and controlled than Bandit while bringing some pizzazz and mystery to the citrus qualities of Cravache. Mind you, I feel that both Bandit and Cravache are fantastic in their own rights. Futur, while sharing qualities with both, clearly has its own place in the Piguet line-up.

Posted
There's not much I can say that Off-Scenter didn't say express better than I could, but here's my take. This is a very unusual scent: it does smell "modern" but at the same time it also feels like a vintage composition because it's so rich and complex compared to most of today's scents. Futur definitely starts off extremely green, in a way that almost brings Estee Lauder's original Private Collection to mind. It's a delicious note, well described by Jardenel. It then moves into a floral-woody base, with the woods becoming increasingly dominant as time passes.The ending features a surprisingly spicy note that I haven't identified.

The most surprising thing to me about this composition is how quiet and subdued it is: this fragrance does NOT scream. It's mellow in its richness, and brings to my mind a green deciduous forest on the East Coast in the middle of July, dark and mysterious, but not somber, as a result of the leaves filtering the sunlight out. It's so subdued, in fact, that you might want the EdP over the parfum because the sprayer will have greater impact.

As to gender, I think this is perfectly wearable by men. The florals are not of the "feminine" type (by this I mean white flowers or sugary rose) and are mainly in a supporting role. It's less overtly floral than my other favorite green fragrance, Guerlain's Chamade, or the aldehydic Chanel no. 19.

Posted
Opens with a ton of aldehydes. I really don't like aldehydes. After all the aldehydes have faded, it's a warmly hesperidic/spicy fragrance, like a classier version of Old Spice.
Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974
Description:

Reintroduced in 2009

Details:
DetailValue
Launched Date1974
GenderWomen
AvailabilityIn Production
ByRobert Piguet
Base Notes
Bottle Designer
Middle Notes
Perfumer
Top Notes
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Start a guide on Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974!
Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Futur by Robert Piguet, 1974