Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997

Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997

Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997
96% Positive Reviews
Rated #236 in Fragrances

Posted

Pros: Unusual and original

Cons: Lack of versatility.

I suppose the easiest way to describe this would be a warm, earthy (with slightly herbal opening) spicy scent. However the floral quality gives it soft warmth (especially in the dry down). This is an inoffensive, warm scent that lingers and shines on your skin, presenting a different scent among so many.

Posted
This juice is really the most amazing thing ever, it smells great and projects very well. It's both fresh and woody so I think it can be worn throughout the day. I haven't smelled anything like this before, it's timeless and unique. I'm 23 and I wear it in casual and formal occasions, but sadly I can't find it anymore here in Mexico. If you're thinking: class, sexiness... this is the fragrance for you!

Posted
The Coriander and the citrus in this scent come together to make a sort of overly sweet bubblegum accord, in my opinion. I would never wear this in public, it doesn't smell masculine to me at all. The question mark at the end of 'uomo?' belongs there.

Posted
Classy scent at a decent price... Longevity is average... Guys - UoMo Moschino is another one of my blind buys that has turned into a pleasant surprise. This is really a good fragrance - especially, if you like the classic spicy musk scents from years ago. Moschino starts with floral and spice notes and then settles into a powdery amber musk fragrance that is very easy on the nose. Very pleasant..!! I have worn the fragrance twice now and enjoy the occasionally whiff from time to time. While I have not received any compliments, i.e. Wow Factor, I do believe it has potential. Given the classic and traditional notes, the fragrance can be worn for any occasion and during any season. It is that versatile. The packaging is above average - nice finishing touch - and the bottle is one of my favorites. I am fond of clear bottles that allow seeing the clarity of the fragrance. My only disappointment with Moschino, is the longevity - to me, the most important performance measure. While the fragrance lasts a little longer on my shirtsleeve, it is barely detectable on the skin 3-4 hours following the initial application. Not bad, but still below average. Perhaps as an option, pack the bottle and reapply as needed. If you like old school spicy fragrances that are easy on the nose, this one is for you. I am not a big fan of this type of cologne, but I definitely recommend buying Moschino. All things considered I will give Moschino 4.1 stars out of 5. It is truly a gem - and the bottle will be a great addition to your collection. Ride on Midnight Rider...

Posted
It suddenly struck me one day that this fragrance is the Italian response to Givenchy's way ahead of it's time Insense. Insense was perhaps the first intensely floral fragrance marketed to men. Uomo? even begs the comparison by asking whether the scent is for men or women with the question mark. Uomo? is a sunny, citrusy yet essentially floral fragrance. The floral sweetness in tamped down by the citrus, unlike in the case of Insense where they went for broke in the floral dept. I think Insense is a masterpiece. But the Moschino is far more versatile, and thus wearable. When I worked at Macy's in the late 90's, I used to not wear scent to work, because every day I could try something new...as much as I wanted...and really get a feel for it. Of course, one is probably only going to like maybe half of what is available at any given time at the fragrance counter. Moschino Uomo? was instantly appealing. But I kept gravitating back to it. That one? Nah. This one? Ehhhh. How about that one? Oh, it's all right... And if I was in doubt, my hand would pick up the tester of MU? and it would be: That's it! It was a default, go to fragrance. Not to say it was a safe, pedestrian choice. No. As much as I came to depend on it, I never got bored with it. I think the mark of a truly great fragrance is that every time you apply it, no matter how often you have in the past, and how familiar you think you are with it; each and every time it is like new. It affects you differently with each wearing, seemingly altering itself to your moods. Moschino Uomo stands proudly on its own. A very old school kind of juice that is not prey to the whimsy one would expect from this designer. Even though most of it's scent notes are aldehydes, it doesn't come across as synthetic. Citrusy into a smokey kind of vanilla and herb, maintaining the cirtrus zest throughout. It's a bit like Versace's The Dreamer, but much better. Much more natural in its execution. It's also strangely adaptive. Any time of year, any age of man, any occasion. It's a keeper...no ? about it.

Posted
Light and pleasant mixture of herbal and fruity notes. You do have to liberally splash it on in order to get the benefit of it - store sprays on wrists just won't give you the sense of being enveloped by it. Perfectly decent, very nice, not in any way unique or great, but perfectly acceptable as a dry, light, masculine scent.

Posted
Uomo? by Moschino must be one of the most underrated mens fragrance of all time. Such a classic (yet modern), vibrant, fresh scent that simply makes you smile everytime you get a whiff during the day. The fragrance opens with slightly sweet blast of kumquat with a liberal dash of green and spices. Throughout its evolution, it mellows into what i can only describe, as per the basenotes description above, as fresh 'sunlight' in a bottle. Truly a classy, sophisticated EDT, with good longevity (7-9 hrs) and its projection is certainly above average. If ever there was such a fragrance category for 'sleepers' as it were, this would be king, hands down.

Posted
I'm surprised no one here has noted what this fragrance most resembles: Signoricci by Nina Ricci. Both perfumes are citrus based, with bitter herbal and wood notes added to flesh out the scents and give them transparency, dryness, and a sunny Mediterranean feel I prefer Signoricci, but Uomo? is still an excellent fragrance, and is worth your consideration. The main difference between the two is that Uomo? is sweeter and more modern smelling than Signoricci, and is actually more versatile. Whereas Signoricci for me is purely a warm weather scent, Uomo? contains amber in the base that sweetens and warms up the fragrance, so it can be worn in colder times of the year. Uomo? isn't groundbreaking, but it is pretty unique. The bitter herb notes never turn this into a bitter scent like YSL Pour Homme, for example, but they do make this a lot more than just some dull, light vanilla fragrance. I like it. MY RATING: 8/10

Posted
I can't believe that something this good is so cheap. When I wear this the one thing I keep thinking is: class. It smells like a long established classic that's been around for ages even though it's not that old. Everyone owes it to themselves to try this, especially if you enjoy a citrusy scent, like I do.

Posted
This level of refinement, sensuality and warmth in a fragrance can only come from Italy. The beauty of this potion is ineffable; an unspeakably private indulgence that one returns to for solace. The tenderness and subtle intermingling of familiar and exotic notes in this perfume tops Ricci Club; I feel blasphemous saying that. Uomo Moschino is an absolute masterpiece of poetic composition and imagination.
Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997
Description:

Black and White stripy box. Very eyecatching. The scent is oriental with aromatic and floral notes.

Details:
DetailValue
Top NotesNew Hedione, Rose Wood, Transparent Coriander, Kumquat.
Middle NotesCyclamen, Cinnamon Leaves, Clary Sage.
Base NotesCedarwood, Artemisia, New Amber Accord, Sunlight Accord, Musk.
Launched Date1997
GenderMen
AvailabilityIn Production
ByMoschino
Bottle Designer
Perfumer
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Start a guide on Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997!
Basenotes › Directory › Fragrances › Uomo? Moschino by Moschino, 1997