Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › OMG!  WORST movie of all time... RENT!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

OMG!  WORST movie of all time... RENT!

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
AHHHHHHH, I've wasted two hours of my life watching the most atrocious movie ever, the film adaptation of the musical Rent.

Why, oh why?

I thought even as a straight guy that I had a pretty good soft spot for musicals...but this was terrible. The songs were just complete rubbish. My ears were in some serious pain. Every time someone started singing, it just sounded like they were making sh!t up off the top of their heads, nothing clever, no good wordplay. And the melodies were nonexistent.

And the characters were awful cutouts of stereotypes of possibly the most annoying people on the planet. I just realized what it is that I LOVE about living in St. Louis...NO FREAKIN' PERFORMANCE ART!!! I know I tend to be a bit conservative, which let's face it is truly as rebellious as one can be nowadays, but the implied morals to the story were just wicked. I'm not even gonna start in on what all I found offensive to anyone with a brain, but jeez, it was all so ridiculous. The moral of the story is what? People are supposed to live rent free and not sell out to the man? Aren't these people a little OLD to be pushing the whole Bohemian thing? That deer-in-headlights Eric Stoltz wannabe with the camera was supposed to be the conscience of the play? OMG. And then the drag queen Angel... I'd love to be able to call myself an artist by sitting around beating on a plastic bucket with drumsticks.

I could go on but I think that film MAY have done me in...
post #2 of 7
NOOOO!!!

My girlfriend and I watched that movie and we both loved it. I think the songs are so catchy for the most part. The play is almost the exact same. The songs are the same as well. There is no difference in anything except for having an actual set instead of using props on a stage.

I love the songs. I made my GF send me a whole bunch of them. I think that if you give it a second chance you will like it a little more. Go see the play. You'll see how it is so similar. There is that same crossdressing man (Angel) and everything is pretty much the same. It was a good movie as far as musicals go IMO. I don't really dig that kind of movie but I was pressured into watching it and I actually liked it a lot.

I'm going to go put on my Rent soundtrack...


EnvYuS
post #3 of 7
I pretty much concur with the "worst movie" indication, even after sitting through Scary Movie 4 last night.

Indie_guy: I think it might be a generational thing. The story appeals to every kid out there who dreams or dreamt of moving to NYC and living like a pious pauper artist in a urine-tainted (Korous!), rat-infested, crime-ridden neighborhood like circa 1985 Alphabet City in order to change the world with their "art."

Call me a cynic, but the hype over this musical when it opened in 1996 was due mostly because of the untimely death of the author, Jonathan Larson just before final dress rehersal while in workshop. It made for excellent PR. It is also important to remember that the NYC depicted in Rent actually no longer existed in 1996 (if it existed at all). The movie definitely comes off grossly dated. Squatting? Today? In Manhattan? How quaint! How romantic! How totally impossible...

As for the piece itself, well, this well-tuned ear found the score unlistenable (loud, sophmoric and a trite rehash of so much good "rock" musical theatre that came before. You want to revisit or discover "Hair" which holds up much better after almost 40 years as opposed to this mess which was stillborn on arrival). And the hackneyed, implausible book-about a particular type of NYC self-indulgent, self-important overgrown adolescent no talent "artists" who manage to remain in their "squat"-is, in spite of the chest thumping PC histronics and thrashing about, ultimately a turn off and a huge snore (Literally. I fell asleep at the film and started snoring, loudly).


But then there are some who, in spite of the glaring shortcomings noted above, absolutely adore "Rent." It was, after all, insanely successful on Broadway.Go figure. A friend of mine who went to the opening said it should have been renamed "Couldn't You Just Die?"


Griff
post #4 of 7
I don't really know about NYC reality during the 80's but Rent didn't impress me; that's why I didn't go to the theater to see it and saved the money for Cats (incredible show!)
Actually, as suggested griff can't go wrong with Hair! (I also adored the remix version of let the sunshine). I also add Jesus Christ Superstar, they definitely signed an era!
post #5 of 7
hehe, Rent was on my school's movie channel recently. It kind of dragged on towards the end and I kept waiting for it to be over, but I liked the songs from it. Very catchy.
post #6 of 7
Sorry, Stay with Ewan McGregor is the worst movie ever. I couldn't figure it out for 2 hours! Why couldn't I figure it out?..because it was all basically a dream, someone subconscious...I was SO mad. Rent looked pretty bad so I didn't even bother to rent it
post #7 of 7
Thread Starter 
There are just so many things about Rent that rubbed me the wrong way...I couldn't stop thinking about it at work tonight.

First off, the whole obsession with the homeless as being some hallowed class. And the same for those with HIV. As if none of either of those groups is in any way responsible for the predicament they are in. There is almost a kind of contempt for those who have homes and for those who don't have HIV. It's really a message that gets tiresome. It's just like every X-mas and Thanksgiving, every local news channel has to show a bunch of footage of homeless shelters etc, just to try to make everyone feel bad for "having so much." Go to hell! I work hard for a living. It may be waiting tables, but I still support myself and I am insulted by the notion that by somehow being able to sustain myself, that I am in some way causing someone else to starve. It's nutty. Like my NOT having HIV is offensive to those living with the disease. That's the vibe I get from some of the more pious scenes in Rent.

And as for my waiting tables... Duh, that's what struggling artists are SUPPOSED to do! What's up with these tards in Rent who have no talent, yet are above taking a menial job to pay the much maligned R*nt? That's what galls me. The guy who wants to be a rockstar does nothing but sit around playing garage band chords on his guitar (complete with the patented D major suspended 4th pinky thing at the third fret that all beginners do when they try to write a song...That's for the musicians reading this) and taking a year to write a song... AND living rent free! I wanted to scream at him to get a damn waiter job!


A few of them had jobs...The teacher, the lawyer, the stripper- good for them. But overall, the theme of this play is that we're supposed to be a bunch of perpetual children into our thirties. I really wanted to yank these self-important douches into a theater and show them films of the sacrifices our young men and women made in World War II. Hey, I'll admit I never did much for my country outside of being a nice guy...but God, somebody stick a pacifier in the mouths of every character in Rent.

Well...except one. I actually sympathized with Taye Diggs character. Am I the only one who thought he was the only reasonable person in the film? As much as they tried to portray him as the bad guy, I thought he had the right idea.

I think Oscar Wilde said something once along the lines of "Ambition is the last refuge of those who have no talent" I think it sums up the characters in Rent and also the whole play itself.

I need to see "Urinetown" to wash the taste of Rent out of my mouth!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Off topic
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › OMG!  WORST movie of all time... RENT!