Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › don't be hatin Marescialla
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

don't be hatin Marescialla

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
"This unusual perfume was created by a French noblewoman, the Countess D'Aumont, wife of a Marshal of France, who used it to scent her gloves. It is said that because of her interest in alchemy, she was charged with witchcraft and burned at the stake. This spiced fragrance perfect for men or women has a dry aroma and strong overtones of mace, a type of pepper, which along with nutmeg is derived from the fruit of the tree Myristica Fragrans."

It's so evil and harsh. I think it could be cool to layer with some Lutens to counteract the sweetness. But it's a wonderful scorching sort of fragrance on its own and of course begs to mingle with and rough up other SMNs. It's not a leather fragrance as some reviews on MUA say, I don't think. Although it is in a league with something like Cuiron for the pure... caustic quality of its chemistry. It has an oddly comforting way about it though, a gentleness. Maybe, again with SMN, this has to do with a feeling/connotation of really serious cleanliness: of micrroorganisms in its wake having been obliterated, leaving only traces of ash. Medicinal to be sure, but beyond that: iodine like, it seems a medicine of yore fallen into disuse for doing its job a bit too well. And, iodine like, it's a scent I imagine somehow in its proper place at the site of some grievous wound: there is a hint of blood or iron or gunpowder, or something...

In 2000, CdG gave us dust on a hot light bulb. In 1828, SMN gave us a sinner in the hands of an angry god, or a very pissed off church at least.
post #2 of 7
Interesting post certainly makes me want to sample it!
post #3 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by supermarky

In 2000, CdG gave us dust on a hot light bulb. In 1828, SMN gave us a sinner in the hands of an angry god.

Jonathan Edwards, I'm impressed .
Interesting that this perfume bears the same name as another classic (allegedly) going back to the 17th century - Crown's Marechale. Seem's that Marshall's wives were olfactory trendsetters at the time. Scented gloves rule! Either that or SMN plagiarized Crown's marketing ploy .

N.B.:With my historian's hat on I do not believe a word of these flowery perfume history stories, as a perfume lover I enjoy them for the romance they conjure up.
post #4 of 7
Thread Starter 
oh wow bring on Marechale!

(I should have dug deeper and pulled up this great line about "whistling on a brick" from some poem about about JE by Robert Lowell... imagine those microoganisms popping like popcorn, and jiffypop left too long on the stove!)

Really though "it is said" she was burned at the stake. That is cheesy. Either she was the toast of Florence or she wasn't!

Also I should mention patchouli. Big and wet with flammable fluids early on, sere in the drydown.
post #5 of 7
I'm sitting (rolling) here ROFL at the absolutely great posts about this somewhat obscure fragrance. Never tried it before, but I sure want to now. All literature PHD's arise!
post #6 of 7
LMAO!! Is it just me or is this story impossible to validate? Kudos to whoever came up with it because it appears to be working, not that it was needed. The perfume is a pleasant scent. Not unique to me personally but pleasant enough to get by without a bogus story .
post #7 of 7
Interesting Post.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: MFD Archive
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › don't be hatin Marescialla