castorpollox, i agree. it's a bit like taxonomy. and like you said, it's fun to have little categories, and it elucidates the similarities and (sometimes unexpected) differences in frags.
lalage and purplebird, like you, (and actually based on advice purplebird gave me when i FIRST found basenotes) i have found that knowing the NOTES is more helpful than the category. the notes give me more information about finding what i'm looking for than the somewhat vague category. still, i feel compelled to KNOW what category it is in.
quarry, this is what i am driving at. foody isn't technically a category, and neither is womanly, or french, for that matter - but they manage to describe the fragrance in a better way than the "official" category. the edwards category system can SORT of hit on it, with the subcategories like RICH, or white flowers, but, for example, the very important "gourmand" distinction does not exist in this system.
i guess i am just frustrated with what i feel is a somewhat inaccurate, arbitrary or incomplete system. but like tddanae said, i guess it's just most important to get the notes to have some idea of what you like.
