How long will it take and what is the best method of "educating" your nose to recognise individual notes.
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › How best to "train" your nose to identify individual fragrance notes
Recent Reviews
-
I dislike the original AdG, always have because of the bitterness and strange orange synthetic note. The Essenza after one wear won me over, smooth opening, soft woodiness once it settles down....
-
Disturbingly bad. This opens up obscure, smoky, spicy and what seems like an attempt of a jasmine flower note. I have smelt jasmine notes from higher end perfumery and this is utterly...
-
This is the first Montale fragrance that I've liked enough to merit purchasing a full bottle. I would like to wax poetic about this frag, but Darvant and others have pretty much captured it's...
-
Here's how Tommy Bahama describes this fragrance: "With a bracing and refreshing blend of island-inspired scents, our Set Sail St. Barts cologne spray treats you to the essence of the Caribbean....
-
Iced bergamot captures the essence of the Caribbean, highlighted with the subtle spice of fresh pepper, white woods, blue lavender and sensual musk. Got this at TJ Maxx. not bad stuff. I...
How best to "train" your nose to identify individual fragrance notes
post #2 of 25
7/30/08 at 5:25am
- anak
- offline
- Gender:

- 1,145 Posts. Joined 11/2000
- Location: Leisure Land
- Select All Posts By This User
post #3 of 25
7/30/08 at 5:59am
- Stuffman
- offline
- Gender:

- 710 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
- Select All Posts By This User
post #4 of 25
7/30/08 at 6:44am
- TwoRoads
- offline
- Gender:

- 5,310 Posts. Joined 9/2007
- Location: Ohio
- Select All Posts By This User
purplebird7 started a thread on the Female Discussion Forum which may be helpful to you: Note Identification Project - Please Join In!
post #5 of 25
7/30/08 at 6:46am
- jenson
- offline
- Gender:

- 5,905 Posts. Joined 11/2007
- Location: Bombay
- Select All Posts By This User
post #6 of 25
7/30/08 at 2:25pm
- AromaX
- offline
- Gender:

- 246 Posts. Joined 2/2008
- Location: Amsterdam
- Select All Posts By This User
It takes years - no joking
The most simple way to smell fragrances, try to describe what you smell reffering the fragrances you know and later compare what your impression with fragrance reviews.
The better way is to smell a lot of raw materials (essential oils and aromachemicals), try to get famliar with them by describing and making associations. Later you can try to identify them back in fragrances. But if you choose for this way you actually begin to study perfumery. Look how far you want to go and how much money you want to spend for (perfumery books, raw materials, etc.)
The most simple way to smell fragrances, try to describe what you smell reffering the fragrances you know and later compare what your impression with fragrance reviews.
The better way is to smell a lot of raw materials (essential oils and aromachemicals), try to get famliar with them by describing and making associations. Later you can try to identify them back in fragrances. But if you choose for this way you actually begin to study perfumery. Look how far you want to go and how much money you want to spend for (perfumery books, raw materials, etc.)
post #7 of 25
7/30/08 at 7:42pm
- mikeperez23
- offline
- Gender:

- Trader Feedback: +202
- Basenotes Institution
-
- 24,277 Posts. Joined 12/2006
- Location: Miami, FL
- Select All Posts By This User
The blog NowSmellThis recently wrote an article on this - link here: http://nowsmellthis.blogharbor.com/b...1/3801813.html
Robin makes a good point at the outset of her article that I tend to agree with:
''...I should say at the outset that identifying fragrance notes is hardly a particular skill of mine, and while being able to smell an unfamiliar perfume and immediately pick out all the notes would be a fun kind of parlour trick, it isn't something I'm able to do, nor is it something I really aspire to. I'm a perfume geek in some ways, but that isn't one of them. I don't really think you need to be an expert on fragrance notes to enjoy perfume — in fact, speaking for myself, I find too much knowledge has a way of "killing the magic"
Robin makes a good point at the outset of her article that I tend to agree with:
''...I should say at the outset that identifying fragrance notes is hardly a particular skill of mine, and while being able to smell an unfamiliar perfume and immediately pick out all the notes would be a fun kind of parlour trick, it isn't something I'm able to do, nor is it something I really aspire to. I'm a perfume geek in some ways, but that isn't one of them. I don't really think you need to be an expert on fragrance notes to enjoy perfume — in fact, speaking for myself, I find too much knowledge has a way of "killing the magic"
post #8 of 25
7/30/08 at 11:26pm
Buy (or share with others) essential oils and aromachemicals. You dilute them (different concentrations) and start smelling them (on skin, on a strip, on materials (cotton & synthetics). The ideal would be to write a comment on each of them with your own images, your own referees. Example : it reminds me the smell in my grandfather's bedroom. Come back to your samples and to your texts from time to time and adapt them regularly, add a few comments. This database is yours (others won't understand a clue). The more you sniff (everything), the more you'll learn.
post #9 of 25
7/30/08 at 11:31pm
- knightowl
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,921 Posts. Joined 8/2004
- Select All Posts By This User
- afraafra
- offline
- Gender:

- 750 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Select All Posts By This User
post #11 of 25
7/31/08 at 12:14am
- Redneck Perfumisto
- offline
- Gender:

- Trader Feedback: +38
- Loving C(h)oco Noir!
-
- 10,596 Posts. Joined 2/2008
- Location: Spiritually, Kansas
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeperez23 
The blog NowSmellThis recently wrote an article on this - link here: http://nowsmellthis.blogharbor.com/b...1/3801813.html
Robin makes a good point at the outset of her article that I tend to agree with:
''...I should say at the outset that identifying fragrance notes is hardly a particular skill of mine, and while being able to smell an unfamiliar perfume and immediately pick out all the notes would be a fun kind of parlour trick, it isn't something I'm able to do, nor is it something I really aspire to. I'm a perfume geek in some ways, but that isn't one of them. I don't really think you need to be an expert on fragrance notes to enjoy perfume in fact, speaking for myself, I find too much knowledge has a way of "killing the magic"

The blog NowSmellThis recently wrote an article on this - link here: http://nowsmellthis.blogharbor.com/b...1/3801813.html
Robin makes a good point at the outset of her article that I tend to agree with:
''...I should say at the outset that identifying fragrance notes is hardly a particular skill of mine, and while being able to smell an unfamiliar perfume and immediately pick out all the notes would be a fun kind of parlour trick, it isn't something I'm able to do, nor is it something I really aspire to. I'm a perfume geek in some ways, but that isn't one of them. I don't really think you need to be an expert on fragrance notes to enjoy perfume in fact, speaking for myself, I find too much knowledge has a way of "killing the magic"
Yes, I agree. I think that's one of the great things about fragrances - you don't need to be an expert to enjoy the heck out of it. It's like skiing, or other sports with a low barrier at the entry level, and lots of enjoyment for beginners. That much being said, I respect the "old dogs" who can do this, and I learn an enormous amount from their reviews. We all aspire to improve, but it should be for our own enjoyment. If note identification every got in the way of my love for fragrance, I'd drop it in a heartbeat.
Another thing I like is what I call (jokingly) "differential aromanalysis" - because in some sense it's like codebreaking. Find fragrances with clearly identical, isolated notes. Then use that to figure out what's causing the note in both of them.
post #12 of 25
7/31/08 at 12:17am
- JaimeB
- offline
- Gender:

- Trader Feedback: +9
- I just want to smell good
-
- 5,389 Posts. Joined 10/2005
- Location: San Francisco, California
- Select All Posts By This User
One of the difficult things about picking out individual notes is that once they are blended into a fragrance, they are part of a larger whole. This makes them lose a bit of their individuality; some are even altered so much in recognizable odor in combination with certain others that they become very hard to isolate in context. Because there are between 2000 and 3000 individual perfume materials being used in contemporary perfumery, it is doubtful that any one nose would be able to discriminate and name them all, even in isolation.
Avery Gilbert has put out an interesting book recently (What the Nose Knows) in which he discusses the question of discriminating different scents. He mentions different estimates of how many scents the human nose can theoretically recognize, but he also mentions another factor: the question of being able to name different scents. This apparently has more to do with the speech centers in the brain than with the olfactory lobe, and seems to limit rather severely the number of specifically identifiable (i. e., by name) scents that humans can talk about.
Anyway, Stuffman is right about getting samples of different scents and practicing recognizing and naming them. A very full collection of these is called a "scent organ" (by analogy with the musical instrument), and is what is used to train noses in traditional perfume houses.
It does take time, but it's worth the effort to recognize and name at least the most common "natural" notes (from nature or synthetics that mimic natural notes), scent classes (how many different "rose" notes are there, for instance), and accords. Keep at it, and good luck.
Avery Gilbert has put out an interesting book recently (What the Nose Knows) in which he discusses the question of discriminating different scents. He mentions different estimates of how many scents the human nose can theoretically recognize, but he also mentions another factor: the question of being able to name different scents. This apparently has more to do with the speech centers in the brain than with the olfactory lobe, and seems to limit rather severely the number of specifically identifiable (i. e., by name) scents that humans can talk about.
Anyway, Stuffman is right about getting samples of different scents and practicing recognizing and naming them. A very full collection of these is called a "scent organ" (by analogy with the musical instrument), and is what is used to train noses in traditional perfume houses.
It does take time, but it's worth the effort to recognize and name at least the most common "natural" notes (from nature or synthetics that mimic natural notes), scent classes (how many different "rose" notes are there, for instance), and accords. Keep at it, and good luck.
post #13 of 25
7/31/08 at 2:25pm
- Bigsly
- offline
- Gender:

- 8,544 Posts. Joined 2/2008
- Select All Posts By This User
Nobody can recognize all the notes in some blends, so I'll focus on the question concerning notes that "trained noses" can recognize easily. In my case, I purchased a bunch of "cheapos" that got good reviews here on BN, and I basically "studied" them. I certainly made some mistakes in the "early days," but now I'm better than anyone I know at note identification. There are still some notes I need to familiarize myself with, but I don't see any rush to do so, since I'm interested in the experience of the actual fragrance. Another thing to do is to smell a fragrance that is very strong in one note, let's say cinnamon, and to also smell actual ground cinnamon.
post #14 of 25
7/31/08 at 2:29pm
I honestly scourge basenotes for colognes I want to smell, I look over what notes they have, and then I go to smell them and see if I can truly pick out the notes. I did that for a couple of months, and then I started to do more "blind" tests, where I would first sniff the scent and see if I could relate it to any other scent I had smelled before, and then I would begin to assimilate notes as I smelled them. After a couple months I could pick out most notes in most fragrances, but I'm sure this will not work out for everyone. My mother was a bloodhound, so I have a good sense of smell (and humor?) 

post #15 of 25
7/31/08 at 5:50pm
post #16 of 25
7/31/08 at 9:33pm
- SculptureOfSoul
- online
- Gender:

- 9,122 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Select All Posts By This User
Stuffman and JaimieB hit the nail on the head. By far the best way to learn individual notes is to.. work with them individually. Just as we learn letters before words before sentences and before proper grammar, so too is it best to learn notes individually, then accords, and then fully dissect a scent. The problem is, it's more like painting than constructing sentences, in that each individual note is a color and once blended, it is impossible to separate the two notes out into their individual parts. Sure, if you blend a heap of red with a dash of white, you'll get a light red, but at some point it becomes pink - neither red nor white but a new color. So too, do oils. A drop of jasmine alongside linden blossom, citrus and magnolia leaves gave the composition a distinctly berry'ish smell - it was nigh unidentifiable as jasmine grandiflorum. Prior to that, the composition had a citric tea quality, and now it was more like blackberry tea. If that particular blend were to be marketed the marketing team may decide on notes of:
blackberry, tea leaves,
While neither oil was actually present there, at all. It is best to keep this in mind when reading a fragrance pyramid. You may smell something that is not listed - that doesn't mean it's not present. You may not smell what is listed - just because it is listed doesn't mean it is there. Take note of how those who explain every note in their review of fragrances with an accompanying pyramid often are at a loss for words when reviewing a fragrance with no notes or pyramid listed. It's a case of.. people smell what they think they smell. I'm not going to say someone will mistake patchouli for say, texas cedar - but for someone to think guaiacwood is actually a tea note? Or to mistake jamarosa root oil for geranium? Wouldn't surprise me at all.
blackberry, tea leaves,
While neither oil was actually present there, at all. It is best to keep this in mind when reading a fragrance pyramid. You may smell something that is not listed - that doesn't mean it's not present. You may not smell what is listed - just because it is listed doesn't mean it is there. Take note of how those who explain every note in their review of fragrances with an accompanying pyramid often are at a loss for words when reviewing a fragrance with no notes or pyramid listed. It's a case of.. people smell what they think they smell. I'm not going to say someone will mistake patchouli for say, texas cedar - but for someone to think guaiacwood is actually a tea note? Or to mistake jamarosa root oil for geranium? Wouldn't surprise me at all.
- afraafra
- offline
- Gender:

- 750 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
Originally Posted by SculptureOfSoul 
Stuffman and JaimieB hit the nail on the head. By far the best way to learn individual notes is to.. work with them individually. Just as we learn letters before words before sentences and before proper grammar, so too is it best to learn notes individually, then accords, and then fully dissect a scent. The problem is, it's more like painting than constructing sentences, in that each individual note is a color and once blended, it is impossible to separate the two notes out into their individual parts. Sure, if you blend a heap of red with a dash of white, you'll get a light red, but at some point it becomes pink - neither red nor white but a new color. So too, do oils. A drop of jasmine alongside linden blossom, citrus and magnolia leaves gave the composition a distinctly berry'ish smell - it was nigh unidentifiable as jasmine grandiflorum. Prior to that, the composition had a citric tea quality, and now it was more like blackberry tea. If that particular blend were to be marketed the marketing team may decide on notes of:
blackberry, tea leaves,
While neither oil was actually present there, at all. It is best to keep this in mind when reading a fragrance pyramid. You may smell something that is not listed - that doesn't mean it's not present. You may not smell what is listed - just because it is listed doesn't mean it is there. Take note of how those who explain every note in their review of fragrances with an accompanying pyramid often are at a loss for words when reviewing a fragrance with no notes or pyramid listed. It's a case of.. people smell what they think they smell. I'm not going to say someone will mistake patchouli for say, texas cedar - but for someone to think guaiacwood is actually a tea note? Or to mistake jamarosa root oil for geranium? Wouldn't surprise me at all.

Stuffman and JaimieB hit the nail on the head. By far the best way to learn individual notes is to.. work with them individually. Just as we learn letters before words before sentences and before proper grammar, so too is it best to learn notes individually, then accords, and then fully dissect a scent. The problem is, it's more like painting than constructing sentences, in that each individual note is a color and once blended, it is impossible to separate the two notes out into their individual parts. Sure, if you blend a heap of red with a dash of white, you'll get a light red, but at some point it becomes pink - neither red nor white but a new color. So too, do oils. A drop of jasmine alongside linden blossom, citrus and magnolia leaves gave the composition a distinctly berry'ish smell - it was nigh unidentifiable as jasmine grandiflorum. Prior to that, the composition had a citric tea quality, and now it was more like blackberry tea. If that particular blend were to be marketed the marketing team may decide on notes of:
blackberry, tea leaves,
While neither oil was actually present there, at all. It is best to keep this in mind when reading a fragrance pyramid. You may smell something that is not listed - that doesn't mean it's not present. You may not smell what is listed - just because it is listed doesn't mean it is there. Take note of how those who explain every note in their review of fragrances with an accompanying pyramid often are at a loss for words when reviewing a fragrance with no notes or pyramid listed. It's a case of.. people smell what they think they smell. I'm not going to say someone will mistake patchouli for say, texas cedar - but for someone to think guaiacwood is actually a tea note? Or to mistake jamarosa root oil for geranium? Wouldn't surprise me at all.
Enlightening and a bit discouraging!
post #18 of 25
7/24/11 at 10:01am
- taint it sweet
- offline
- Gender:

- 1,349 Posts. Joined 9/2010
- Location: North of Chicago
- Select All Posts By This User
post #19 of 25
7/24/11 at 10:12am
- Ken_Russell
- offline
- Gender:

- 14,450 Posts. Joined 1/2006
- Location: Sibiu
- Select All Posts By This User
I'm turning 28 this summer and was an (on-and-off) fragrance buff since I was 14, so "training" my (still very amateurish, especially in relation with certain fragrance notes) nose, took me about half of my known lifespan so far, but this is just an individual example and definitely no standard learning curve
post #20 of 25
7/24/11 at 10:23am
- hednic
- offline
- Gender:

- 45,627 Posts. Joined 10/2007
- Location: United States
- Select All Posts By This User
post #21 of 25
7/24/11 at 11:07am
post #22 of 25
7/24/11 at 12:44pm
- cybermorph
- offline
- 85 Posts. Joined 6/2011
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Select All Posts By This User
post #23 of 25
12/10/12 at 10:23am
I smell as I go along building a scent and try to notice what each addition does. In theory, I add enough of one ingredient until it becomes barely perceptible and then go onto another. I keep smelling-strips of each stage of the construction of the scent and then go back and smell it as it evolved. I'm not very good at it, but I seem to be getting better.
post #24 of 25
12/10/12 at 10:44am
- frostyicy
- offline
- Gender:

- 1,509 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Select All Posts By This User
Some notes are so distinct that they are easier to detect and hard to not notice for me, Neroli is such a note. Every time I smell a fragrance and I detect what I think is Neroli I will check the note pyramid and Neroli will be listed.
I think that it just takes time to develop this skill. For me many times I smell a fragrance and I write down what I think I smell, and then I view a note pyramid to see if my nose won. Most of the time my nose loses.
I can easily detect: Neroli, citruses, cinnamon, amber and incense(cuz I detest both very much) and most gourmand notes.
I think that it just takes time to develop this skill. For me many times I smell a fragrance and I write down what I think I smell, and then I view a note pyramid to see if my nose won. Most of the time my nose loses.
I can easily detect: Neroli, citruses, cinnamon, amber and incense(cuz I detest both very much) and most gourmand notes.
post #25 of 25
12/10/12 at 11:19am
- Jack Hunter
- offline
- Gender:

- 9,939 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User
A good way to train your nose to detect certain notes is to go to the Fragranica website to view the breakdown of notes of the scent you are testing and then smell you fragrance to see if you recognize or identify the notes. Eventually you will begin to recognize different notes like bergamont, amber,musk and build up your scent memory.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Male Fragrance Discussion
- How best to "train" your nose to identify individual fragrance notes
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › How best to "train" your nose to identify individual fragrance notes
Currently, there are 391 Active Users
(40 Members and 351 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Fueguia 1833 - Most interesting new perfumery 3 minutes ago
- › IS MY BOTTLE OF CREED AVENTUS FAKE OR LEGIT? NO LOT NUMBER ON BOTTLE 6 minutes ago
- › Sandalwood Based Fragrances 6 minutes ago
- › Compact Discs for Breakfast 7 minutes ago
- › Just sampled: "Bentley for Men" 8 minutes ago
- › Pure Malt. Lies & Deception. 10 minutes ago
- › Learning smells: the science 10 minutes ago
- › mousse de saxe 15 minutes ago
- › Amouage Grading 17 minutes ago
- › Fragrances stronger after a couple of sprays/applications? 18 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Acqua Di Giò Essenza by Giorgio Armani, 2012 by nyguy
- › Indian Night Jasmine by Body Shop, 2012 by IsaIsabella
- › Dark Aoud by Montale, 2011 by seeminglytransparent
- › Set Sail St. Barts For Men by Tommy Bahama, 2007 by marcuslaughter
- › Set Sail Martinique For Men by Tommy Bahama, 2010 by marcuslaughter
- › Bulgari Man Extreme by Bulgari, 2013 by marcuslaughter
- › Lime Sec by Pinaud by marcuslaughter
- › Lilac Vegetal by Pinaud, 1880 by marcuslaughter
- › Urban Musk by Tom Ford, 2009 by Bal a Versailles
- › 1740 Marquis De Sade by Histoire de Parfums, 2008 by GianniGG
View: More Reviews
New Fragrance Articles
- › Aoud by M.Micallef celebrates its Tenth... by Judith Brockless
- › Dueto Parfums release new fragrance, Citiver by Judith Brockless
- › Guerlain ‘Les Parisiennes’... by Judith Brockless
- › Iris Prima: ‘The Spirit of the Ballet. ... by Judith Brockless
- › Pell Wall Releases 1953 Pour Homme and Eau de... by Judith Brockless
- › Serge Lutens by Grant
- › An Interview with Christopher Sheldrake -... by Grant
- › Aedes de Venustas launch Iris Nazarena next... by Grant
- › UK FiFi Award winners 2013 by Grant
- › UK FiFi Awards tonight. by Grant
Home | Fragrance Product Guide | Forums | Fragrance Articles | My Profile
About Basenotes | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Basenotes is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle
About Basenotes | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Basenotes is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle









