Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › Riddle me this Strange Marriage Situation
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Riddle me this Strange Marriage Situation

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 
21 year old girl meets 31 year old boy in September. They become friends then start to date. 11 months pass. They get engaged. They decide on a 3 year engagement.

What idiots have a longer engagement than the time they've known each other? Who does that? If I was FORCED to marry someone okay I'd appreciate a longer engagement but otherwise why not date for another year or two if you're not sure then have a one or two year engagement? Money isn't an issue for the couple. Educational or occupational factors aren't a concern either. Girl lives with her parents as she always has and not with him. Girl has no 4 year degree and works odd jobs. Guy works in Real Esate. Girl is not mature for her age, she acts impetuous and childish. Guy is super protective like a CIA-Mossad-KGB fusioned sentry.

Has anyone witnessed a bizarre circumstance like this before? Is this a divorce or break up begging to happen?

- Al

As an aside I don't know any marriage that lasted in which two people got engaged without dating for at least a couple of years. It may have started sweet but give it 1, 2, 5 years it crumbled like the Berlin Wall. Something about marriage and living with someone and knowing the rest of your life is with that same person changes everything. I love it when people pull the old "well we met and after 5 months knew it was forever" then they get divorced eventually.
post #2 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

21 year old girl meets 31 year old boy in September. They become friends then start to date. 11 months pass. They get engaged. They decide on a 3 year engagement.

What idiots have a longer engagement than the time they've known each other? Who does that? If I was FORCED to marry someone okay I'd appreciate a longer engagement but otherwise why not date for another year or two if you're not sure then have a one or two year engagement? Money isn't an issue for the couple. Educational or occupational factors aren't a concern either. Girl lives with her parents as she always has and not with him. Girl has no 4 year degree and works odd jobs. Guy works in Real Esate. Girl is not mature for her age, she acts impetuous and childish. Guy is super protective like a CIA-Mossad-KGB fusioned sentry.

Has anyone witnessed a bizarre circumstance like this before? Is this a divorce or break up begging to happen?

- Al

As an aside I don't know any marriage that lasted in which two people got engaged without dating for at least a couple of years. It may have started sweet but give it 1, 2, 5 years it crumbled like the Berlin Wall. Something about marriage and living with someone and knowing the rest of your life is with that same person changes everything. I love it when people pull the old "well we met and after 5 months knew it was forever" then they get divorced eventually.

My wife and I were engaged for about a year and dated for about a year and a half. With that in mind, the engagement lasted as long as it did because we were still in college, and we also planned the wedding a year in advance to get ready, send out invitations, and give people time to plan, put it in their schedules, and save up a little money to fly down to Texas to join us.

While I'm morally against long engagements (might as well just go get married if it is that long), what concerns me is the personality of these two which you described. Hopefully, God willing, they can work over their shortcomings and build a long-lasting relationship together.

Something about marriage and living with someone changes your life. You see the best and worst in your spouse. One of my favorite stories I like to tell people thinking about getting married is one that I heard from a Baptist preacher. Guy and gal got married, were totally in love with one another. Thought the moon and stars shone in their eyes. Each other thought the other utterly flawless. They got married. Hadn't had relations before marriage. Et cetera. The wedding night came and she had to go to the bathroom before sex. And he could hear her in the next room while waiting in bed.

The guy was literally shocked. He told this fellow next week at church and he said, "Well, when you get married, you have to deal with farting."

The point of that gross little story is that we all have to deal with crap and farting in marriage - whether it is physical or mental.

This is why marriages normally break up within the first five years. It is based mostly on sex and it doesn't have a strong basis in anything other than that.
post #3 of 24
Maybe her parents are wielding their influence? They can't stop her from marrying this guy, but they can convince her to prolong it...maybe hoping for more certainty in their relationship? Just a possiblility. (from a mothers perspective! )
post #4 of 24
Thread Starter 
Maybe but as far as I know the girl is happy about the long engagement. I mean she wasn't even considering him as her "boyfriend" until last January. That's whats so strange about it all. And they hadn't had sex until about 5-6 months into the relationship so it's not like a crazy sex maniacal thing. What's even stranger I remember the girl telling me in October (when they were just casually dating) how she wants to be married in the next 1-2 years and my thinking how can you plan on finding a husband in two years? You can't will falling in love. Sooo strange. The whole thing reeks of break up or divorce. Unmet expectations and disappointments. I can totally see the "farting" thing happening. The girl still has a branding of the initial of her ex-boyfriend (her only other boyfriend) on her wrist. Things like this just make me uneasy. I wonder if its a security thing. She's 22 now with no real education and her mother has been pushing her to settle down and get married for a number of years now. Being engaged to this guy I guess gives her a definite meal ticket and she has 3 years to decide on it. On his end he's got a young wife he can control and has 3 years to play the field. It's a grim way to look at it but almost everyone I know has either committed infidelity, broken an engagement off, been abused, or caused abuse after engaging. The one's who didn't got divorced in the first 6 months of marriage. The successful marriages I know of involves people who were friends for 5 or so years then dated for a year or more and got married. They all were similar in age with their spouse(with 5 years), had similar socioeconomic backgrounds and education, and both made a living independently so neither had to support the other. She's not the homemaker type either. She can't even boil an egg. So man the whole thing is creeping me out like a bad dream.

- Al
post #5 of 24
Fear.
post #6 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

... On his end he's got a young wife he can control and has 3 years to play the field...

- Al

Does an "engaged to be married" man "play the field" while engaged? I never thought there was any field playing during an engagement. Call me old fashioned.
post #7 of 24
This is a classic, textbook example. So much so that it reeks of its obviousness.


Count your blessings that this isnt your problem.
post #8 of 24
Thread Starter 
Well does a boyfriend or girlfriend play the field? Does a husband or wife? Almost everyone cheats. Especially today. Right time, right place, right emotional mood, right person, right climate and things happen. Personally, I've never cheated but have been the catalyst for someone in a marriage or relationship. 90% of the time it started with the person almost rudely saying how she HAS A SERIOUS BOYFRIEND after I'd just say "Hey." Or how she has no attraction to me and that we're just friends and that shes going to get really angry if I get the wrong idea. 100% of the time I wake up next to her in the morning. I don't do it anymore as I realize how painful it is for the husband, boyfriend, meal ticket whatever and more importantly I don't like being a human dildo.

Point is YES people cheat more in the years of engagement than any other because they see it as a last chance. Both men and women actually. The years of engagement are the final year or years to get anything left out your system. It's sick I know but people do it. Another reason I don't see the point of a long engagement if you know you want to marry someone and have the money to do it A year to plan the wedding and everything I get but when its 3 years or more I just think its a security deposit where one thinks they have someone hitched and now can play for a few years then get serious. No one ever thinks they are getting cheated on. Most people are or have been at one point. Another reason why I doubt I'm ever getting married. I've seen too much to ever want to. I really don't believe in "love" anymore because I've never seen it in true form. As soon as the words I love you or I'm in love with you or will you marry me get exchanged almost on cue people turn and do horrible things to one another, like they have to. If I ever fall in love I hope she says I HATE YOU because that's easier to figure out.

- Ali
post #9 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerangedGoose View Post

This is a classic, textbook example. So much so that it reeks of its obviousness.


Count your blessings that this isnt your problem.

Could you elaborate? My friend said the SAME thing to me. His theory being that she will marry him, they will have 2 kids then divorce. The chilling reality in that was that he NEVER met her has no clue about her and pretty much described what happened to her mother to a T. He said it all has to do with social conditioning. Just curious what your rationale was.

- Al
post #10 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

Could you elaborate? My friend said the SAME thing to me. His theory being that she will marry him, they will have 2 kids then divorce. The chilling reality in that was that he NEVER met her has no clue about her and pretty much described what happened to her mother to a T. He said it all has to do with social conditioning. Just curious what your rationale was.

- Al

These situations are fairly common and are pretty easy to come by. Your friend is exactly right, (most usually), its the product of the same set of conditioning circumstances. An overwhelming majority of females who find themselves in the classic, archetypal subordinate position have almost always assumed that role as a result of poor father figures and a lack of positive male presence in general. A mother is responsible for establishing the feminine persona in her daughter, while her father establishes the standard for contact, behavior, and relationships with the opposite sex. From what you said alone, several things can be assumed and established about this girl

1) She has no grasp of the concept of independence and self sufficiency. Her parents have carried her emotional and physical needs utterly and completely up until this point, at which she has unloaded her (volatile) emotional needs on the next man in her life
2) She has never been pushed to accomplish anything. Because she has never had to strive to succeed or put effort forth, most likely she will find that she will grow tired of the majority of her relationships and eventually she will fall out of them, just as she falls out of one job after another, and I assume this also accounts for her inability to commit to an education
3) Her parents have obviously permitted this behavior, and by allowing it, they have subconsciously instituted a regime of positive-reinforcement for a behavior that is essentially negative and potentially highly damaging in the long run.
4) She is completely inexperienced. Thus far, she has two models of relationships in her life. The first is her parents, and while I cannot comment on the status and stability of their relationship, it would seem that they must not have a very close one, and respective mother-daughter and father-daughter ties are probably loose and emotionally casual. Her second model is whatever ex-boyfriend she has, and for whatever reason, that relationship failed, most likely do to volatile and impetuous behavior on her part (evidenced by the tattoo of his name on her wrist)

If they get married and stay married long enough to have kids, it will most definitely ruin their relationship and result in divorce, which will subsequently create a damaging environment for child development and potentially sets the stage for this cycle to continue. While I make no judgment call on these people personally, it is obvious that both of these people are highly irresponsible and incredibly lonely, which together is a very dangerous combination. They should have the common sense to put the brakes on whatever it is they are doing before it results in something irreversible, like a child, as that is unfair to the both of them and more importantly, the child itself.

My question to you is this: Why is this an issue that concerns you so much? From your prior posts you seem to be very engrossed in your cynical outlook of relationships in general. I don't condone cheating, and in my eyes, the "other person" is just as much as fault as the person that cheated. You shouldn't hook up with a girl you know has a boyfriend, regardless of how much she is coming onto you. Regardless of whether or not it is your problem, it is a self respect issue. You should never be willing to lower yourself to the level of being the "other person". If you are someone with anything decent to offer, and you have described yourself as a handsome, fit dude, there is no reason that you should not be able to find someone worthwhile as your equal to share your time with.

I think you are looking at this all the wrong way. It has less to do with the idea that love does not exist anymore and more to do with that people nowadays are growing more and more impatient and irresponsible. For most people, marraige is an upgraded, logical step past the relationship phase, which is completely wrong. Marraige is because you have decided you want to spend the rest of your life with this person and feel the need to consummate that vow. One does not (and should not) get married to have children. Children are just the product of a happy and healthy marriage. A marriage held together solely by the fact that you had children with someone is a miserable marriage indeed and will most likely end extremely bitterly with severe emotional fallout for the children. Living in an area as wealthy as orange county, I can't tell you how many of my friends families have twisted and distorted dynamics which have wreaked untold havoc upon the emotional stability and logistics of it's members. Money can only buy entertainment, not happiness.

You should lose the bitter attitude, dude. After a big heartbreak a couple years ago, I had the same exact outlook but I eventually realized that one bad experience is just that, a bad experience, and there is no reason to assume the actions of one person reflect the sentiments of their gender as a whole. It's not an issue of girls being meaner to boys or vice versa, its just that people are completely irresponsible and out of touch with their emotions, which results in self-hurt and the hurt of everyone they become intimate with

Live your life open to the possibility that one day, you will meet a special someone and they will be just as scared of opening up to you as you are to them, and yet you both will want to find the courage to take the plunge.

If I could sum it all up, I would say that Alfred Lord Tennyson was totally right when he said "It is better to have loved and lost, than never to have loved at all". Every experience is an opportunity to learn something, grow, and emerge a stronger person from that event.

Life is a great big videogame, my friend, but a high score is meaningless if you achieve it on your own.
post #11 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerangedGoose View Post

Life is a great big videogame, my friend, but a high score is meaningless if you achieve it on your own.

Yeah, sometimes I feel like I'm playing the SIMS. We still have folding chairs in our living room.

I can't explain others' behavior, but as for myself, my parents were my role models as well. They met and were married within 1 year. No engagement. They've been married over 35 years, now. So, as a result, I don't believe in long engagements either. In fact, I don't think we were ever engaged. We just decided to get married, and did so very similarly to both of our parents. We eloped, much to the consternation of my mother's very large Catholic family who were upset enough that their oldest daughter eloped, only to have their oldest grandchild do the same thing.

But the apples don't fall far from the tree.
post #12 of 24
Goose is right. If anything you should be a supportive friend to this couple, no matter how their marriage turns out.

And hope for the best.
post #13 of 24
Thread Starter 
Amazing, after knowing her for over a year I I can say most if to all your assumptions are right. Her parents are divorced her and Dad was never there for her as a child or even now. She however has had one boyfriend who she was with from 15 to 20 in an on and off fashion. He physically abused her. I met her a year after they parted ways for good but wanted to go find him and cripple him after she told me this but she said its a resolved issue and I didn't interfere. Anyway she dated guys in between her on and offs but nothing serious aside from an engaged guy she dated that obviously didn't work out. Getting nauseous yet? Yeah. She only had sex with the one boyfriend though and felt strange about being naked even in front of her boyfriend and felt stranger having anything below her waist "touched." More psychological factors at play I'm sure. So she started dating this new guy a year and a half ago, a little after we met. And thy got engaged in August which blows my mind since up until January she didn't even consider him a boyfriend.

Why do I care? If it isn't obvious, I have a fondness for this person. I won't get into details but her and I used to be very close at one point then turned to bitter enemies then didn't talk for almost a year. Due to reasons beyond our control we are joined at the hip now (no, its not a child, but a film we're both in). Its time for the final edit, press releases, festivals and such and her and I are unavoidably forced to come together. I had all but forgotten about her. But then after looking at our scenes I broke down since we worked so well together and all I could think of was the fun we had not the bad and I wrote her a long apology a month ago. She just thanked me, nothing more. Now I see her in a few weeks to go over the footage and I'm losing my sanity. I don't know what to say or do to win her faith back. She's a piece of emotional steel. I have to see this person yet she wont even talk to me and is engaged in a strange way. Oh and to boot she never mentioned a thing about being engaged even after I told her I'm happy for her to have any boyfriend or husband as long as he treats her right. No response to that. I found out through a mutual acquaintance. "I"m engaged, I just want to review the footage with you otherwise BACK OFF" would have been harsh but at least a resolution and we'd get the job done. I'm getting mind games from her instead and can't do my job. I even told her she doesnt have to deal with me she can deal with my producer. Yet she contacts me directly then sends her manager after me a month later.

- ali
post #14 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

Amazing, after knowing her for over a year I I can say most if to all your assumptions are right. Her parents are divorced her and Dad was never there for her as a child or even now. She however has had one boyfriend who she was with from 15 to 20 in an on and off fashion. He physically abused her. I met her a year after they parted ways for good but wanted to go find him and cripple him after she told me this but she said its a resolved issue and I didn't interfere. Anyway she dated guys in between her on and offs but nothing serious aside from an engaged guy she dated that obviously didn't work out. Getting nauseous yet? Yeah. She only had sex with the one boyfriend though and felt strange about being naked even in front of her boyfriend and felt stranger having anything below her waist "touched." More psychological factors at play I'm sure. So she started dating this new guy a year and a half ago, a little after we met. And thy got engaged in August which blows my mind since up until January she didn't even consider him a boyfriend.

Why do I care? If it isn't obvious, I have a fondness for this person. I won't get into details but her and I used to be very close at one point then turned to bitter enemies then didn't talk for almost a year. Due to reasons beyond our control we are joined at the hip now (no, its not a child, but a film we're both in). Its time for the final edit, press releases, festivals and such and her and I are unavoidably forced to come together. I had all but forgotten about her. But then after looking at our scenes I broke down since we worked so well together and all I could think of was the fun we had not the bad and I wrote her a long apology a month ago. She just thanked me, nothing more. Now I see her in a few weeks to go over the footage and I'm losing my sanity. I don't know what to say or do to win her faith back. She's a piece of emotional steel. I have to see this person yet she wont even talk to me and is engaged in a strange way. Oh and to boot she never mentioned a thing about being engaged even after I told her I'm happy for her to have any boyfriend or husband as long as he treats her right. No response to that. I found out through a mutual acquaintance. "I"m engaged, I just want to review the footage with you otherwise BACK OFF" would have been harsh but at least a resolution and we'd get the job done. I'm getting mind games from her instead and can't do my job. I even told her she doesnt have to deal with me she can deal with my producer. Yet she contacts me directly then sends her manager after me a month later.

- ali


First off, you've pretty much answered your own question. You've stated this girl has severe psychological issues stemming from her father, physical abuse, possible sexual abuse, complete lack of parenting and guidance, and a host of other factors. This girl is a textbook case and what she needs is a therapist, not a boyfriend (unfortunately, neither is a role you can fill, though its not really any fault of your own).

It's obvious that this girl will sabotage any relationship she finds herself in, assuming that she doesn't end up with someone who will emotionally or physically abuse the hell out of her first. As a result of that, there is no way that you two could have a successful, meaningful, and most importantly, healthy relationship until she has those issues resolved. As far as being a piece of emotional steel, I think she is probably more of a broken record, too busy repeatedly going through her tired motions to hear or respond to anyone.

I don't know how old she is, but she is like a 16 year old on the inside, and that's definitely not serious relationship material. At this point in your life, you should be over playing games, and so should be anyone that you bother to spend your time with. Your reaction to petty "mind games" (they probably arent even deliberate, just a manifestation of subconscious feelings) is solely in the realm of your control, and it's up to you how you react to her. Feeling negative and depressed only makes you feel worse, look immature, and feeds whatever twisted ego/motivations are driving her actions. This girl probably doesn't even know how she feels about herself, so I doubt she is giving much thought about how she feels about anyone else, except maybe in relation to her immediate self. If it is so obvious that she is incapable of sustaining even a friendship, you should be the bigger person, cut your losses, and keep your relationship professional.

Furthermore, regardless of what you think of her behavior or her fiancee, it is not your place to comment on their relationship or attempt to interfere with it, even if it's under the guise of "helping" her (you are not her therapist). If she comes to you one day with a serious question and asks your legitimate advice on her situation, then would be the appropriate time to offer your feelings and opinion. Remember, this girl is a person with legitimate psychological issues as a result of numerous trauma over an extended period of time, and she is not your project. You cannot "save" her.

The world is literally split evenly down the middle with the genders, and there is a whole society out there full of women your age who are smart/funny/successful/talented/whatever it is you are seeking, and furthermore, have the emotional maturity and stability necessary to facilitate a relationship. As good friends as you were with her, this girl is not someone who has some sort of fundamental emotional impact on your life, and you should not consider her problems your own (doing so will get you nowhere). You should simply wish her the best and move on with no hard feelings.

Out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to physically track down her boyfriend more than a year after they had broke up, when you had never even known them when they were together? That''s her past, not yours, and as unfortunate as it is that she was physically abused, wanting to seek out the culprit is highly out of proportion considering that the matter technically did not concern you in any way. From what I can tell, I think you need to maybe take another look at the way you assign gender roles and behaviors. The whole "super macho" thing is really unnecessary, and the only girls you will attract with it will be girls like the one you described, who are physically dependent on some sort of domineering male presence in their lives. I don't know if that's what you are looking for, but that's not what I would want for myself.

All in all, you should just stop worrying about her. Whatever she will do you have no control over. There is no reason to be rude, but there is also definitely no reason to get depressed over her.
post #15 of 24
Thread Starter 
Well, shes never been sexually abused. I think shes just not comfortable with herself and is also fairly conservative. But she is messed up for sure. I cant help feel the way I do though. At least I know my personal hang up, I gotta be the kid with the most cake even if it means stealing someones else's cake (hence the post about cheating). I'm super competitive by nature, my locker says "second place means you lost" on it. Type A doesn't even start to explain me. BUT you grow up at some point in life and learn that some things arent worth it and others aren't attainable. And that losing is the best way to learn sometimes. Let go and move on. But no ones made me as happy on a professional or personal level in the last 10 years as she did. Even one of my female friends who HATED her told me I should go get her. I may well try to break her up with her man, I've never failed before with other girls. I'm better at that than I am normally dating I think LoL. But that's immature and silly. At this point its not about that, it's about re-establishing at the least a working relationship if not a friendship. I just wish I knew what to say to her.

I'm not really that macho at all. People are pretty shocked when they find out I fight regularly as sport or wrestled and played football. They see me as a poetry writing type (which I do). I'm pretty muscular but real gentle and goofy. Even when fighting I pull my punches and kicks a little so as not to hurt people just knock them down. I am a bit crazy when it comes to abuse toward women though. I turn PSYCHO. A switch turns on and I've been told by a friend I just turn freakishly scary. I went up to my ex's college one time and put the fear of God in some guy because he made her cry so I made him cry. And I didnt even like her at that point. Hell when I was 9 I kicked in a guys shin because he made a pass at my mother. I'm not violent but am assertive and protective of women. I grew up in some tough neighborhoods, 16 cities from age 6 to 12 alone. Its like that Johnny Cash song, "A Boy Named Sue." My parents named me "Ali" during the days of the Iran-Contra affair. So, I grew up quick and I grew up mean my fist got hard and my wits got keen.

- Ali
post #16 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerangedGoose View Post

...Furthermore, regardless of what you think of her behavior or her fiancee, it is not your place to comment on their relationship or attempt to interfere with it, even if it's under the guise of "helping" her (you are not her therapist). If she comes to you one day with a serious question and asks your legitimate advice on her situation, then would be the appropriate time to offer your feelings and opinion... and she is not your project. You cannot "save" her...

I have to agree with the Goose here. Ultimately, if you are her 'rescuer' (aka - 'father figure') you will end up resenting having to do everything for her. You will eventually wonder why she can't do for herself. The same applies to women who are 'mothering'. A woman doesn't need or want to be a mother to her husband. IMO (my husband & I are married 21 years) a marriage must be between 2 adults. I use the word 'adult' to specify not only chronologic age, but mental & emotional maturity. Really it is a partnership. The committment of marriage encompasses the entireity of the individuals...beyond the physical. My marriage has been strengthened by hardships. We share the burdens and the joys, not always equally, but back and forth. Sometimes our greatest happiness comes from conquering an incredible challenge, knowing it did not destroy us. Hopefully this is making sense to you, I don't know how else to describe marriage but for my own experience. My husband is my partner, my friend, lover, confidant, my most ardent supporter. I try my very best to be the same for him. We always play on the same team. Find someone who doesn't NEED you - but WANTS you. Completely.
post #17 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubuandibeme View Post

Find someone who doesn't NEED you - but WANTS you. Completely.

Important distinction, ubu. And I agree.

If you keep trying to save people, they forget how to save themselves. I learned that the very hard way. Professional relationship is fine, but I'm sorry to say that I agree with DerangedGoose (I agree with a DerangedGoose?!?!?) that she is broken, and will probably not be fixed. By therapy, or anything else.

I used to try to fix people. My ego gets in the way, you see. And always I feel I must fix people.

Then I learned to put aside my ego and say, some broken things just remain broken. And I can be smarter, more beautiful, more nice, more charming, and these people are *still* F-ing broken. And the drama and toxicity they attract in life follows those who try to help them, and brings them down with it. And, after seeing what that kind of toxicity in my life did to my own family (who worried about me immensely during those times), I realized it wasn't worth it. My family (who is stable and non-toxic) was worth more to me than broken losers who refuse help.
post #18 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aiona View Post

Important distinction, ubu. And I agree.

If you keep trying to save people, they forget how to save themselves. I learned that the very hard way. Professional relationship is fine, but I'm sorry to say that I agree with DerangedGoose (I agree with a DerangedGoose?!?!?) that she is broken, and will probably not be fixed. By therapy, or anything else.

I used to try to fix people. My ego gets in the way, you see. And always I feel I must fix people.

Then I learned to put aside my ego and say, some broken things just remain broken. And I can be smarter, more beautiful, more nice, more charming, and these people are *still* F-ing broken. And the drama and toxicity they attract in life follows those who try to help them, and brings them down with it. And, after seeing what that kind of toxicity in my life did to my own family (who worried about me immensely during those times), I realized it wasn't worth it. My family (who is stable and non-toxic) was worth more to me than broken losers who refuse help.

I think C.S. Lewis said it best in "The Four Loves": Love is a matter of choice. Where there is true freedom, there is true love. Of course, I'm paraphrasing it.

I think finding someone who doesn't NEED you is the important thing. That's not love. That's infatuation. Today's love songs are littered with elements in this vein. "I need you, baby. I gotta have it," sort of mentality. Also, people tend to think that there is a "perfect person out there for them." A yin to their yang. I tend to disagree. Love isn't a matter of finding a person you have been destined to be with. Love is choice.

My wife asks me at times, "Why do you love me?" I tell her, "Because I chose you."
post #19 of 24
Quote:
My wife asks me at times, "Why do you love me?" I tell her, "Because I chose you."

That's a pretty good one, actually.

Oh, and, welcome to 'The club of men with taller girlfriends / wives'.
post #20 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

I am a bit crazy when it comes to abuse toward women though. I turn PSYCHO.

I dunno why, but women who can't stick up for themselves annoy me. If a woman has to call her boyfriend to protect her, I consider her a useless wimp. Any woman worth her salt should do her best not to put herself in a position to be abused or used. And if she does somehow find herself in a bad way, she should always know what to do to get revenge. Legally, of course.

"A woman of hot temper, and a man the same, is a less dangerous enemy than one quiet and clever." -- "Medea" by Euripides
post #21 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stereotomy View Post

That's a pretty good one, actually.

Oh, and, welcome to 'The club of men with taller girlfriends / wives'.

I like 'em tall! Probably because I'm 5'2" and shorter than the rest of the average male population.
post #22 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by anak View Post

Well does a boyfriend or girlfriend play the field? Does a husband or wife? Almost everyone cheats. Especially today.

Not true, I guess it depends on the type of crowd you hang around with. What people do with their relationships is none of my business or yours. All of this analyzing into their personal life is very intrusive and I am getting a red flag, here...

Adding, if you are casually dating someone and you decide to date someone else, that's not "cheating." If you are living with someone or have made declarations of love, loyalty, etc, it is.
post #23 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachroses View Post

Not true, I guess it depends on the type of crowd you hang around with.

Agreed. In my experience, the observations made here about women and relationships are broad generalizations of a particular group of people that share similar emotional baggage and damage. These types of people tend to bind together out of common need (as does any group of people with shared experience or interests), and because the rest of us get tired of having their drama spill over into our lives. These characterizations are not at all representative of my friends and acquaintances.
post #24 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by an_oud_girl View Post

Agreed. In my experience, the observations made here about women and relationships are broad generalizations of a particular group of people that share similar emotional baggage and damage. These types of people tend to bind together out of common need (as does any group of people with shared experience or interests), and because the rest of us get tired of having their drama spill over into our lives. These characterizations are not at all representative of my friends and acquaintances.

I've met virgin brides to super conservative only kissing until dating for 5 months kind of women to women who won't leave their boyfriends for a second all of whom have cheated. I've met very stable good girls, good loving family, good job, no trauma, who have cheated. This is no generalization its a sad fact. Maybe its an age or demographic thing but then again no, I've seen it with women as old as 45 and as young as 16 (though an argument could be made for the 16 yr old just being young and impressionable). I mean people get on their high horses and talk about fidelity and I see them cheating the next day. Numerous girls have made a firm point about how they LOVEEE their fiance or boyfriend. I've experienced otherwise. Statistics aren't always truth but if you look at them in terms of infidelity rates they are higher than ever before. Maybe its Hollywood promoting infidelity in movies like The Hours or American Beauty saying ITS OKAY you deserve it! Maybe its the sense of freedom people feel. I don't know but I've lived in almost 20 cities and been around the world. Fidelity is a myth that breaks many hearts.

Also, its a generation thing I believe. Gen X and Gen Y are being taught less values but also given more freedom. I mean no offense but Beachroses, An_oud_girl, are you over 35? That's makes a big difference.

- Al
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Off topic
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › Riddle me this Strange Marriage Situation