Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › Nelson Mandela released twenty years ago today.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Nelson Mandela released twenty years ago today.

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
This is what I wrote for my 9 year old son:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/
Click on the video of the BBC report of Mandela's release.

Nelson Mandela was a member of the military wing (i.e. they had guns and used violence) of the A.N.C. (the African National Congress) which was an organisation which supported freedom for black people in Africa. They were especially active in South Africa where they had a system called "apartheid" (pronounced apart-hate) which meant that the white people were very rich and controlled everything; the army, the government,education, everything. The black people were kept very poor, lived in terrible conditions and very little education, healthcare or other facilities.

Of course the white goverment called Mandela a terrorist and put him in prison, where he stayed for 27 years. He became very well known all over the world and the symbol for many of the struggle for freedom. As I grew up and became a young man with my peers, he was our real life hero. There was a permenant demonstation outside the South African emabassy in Trafalgar square calling for his release, pop songs and many other protests.

20 years ago today, the white president F.W. De Clerk agreed to release him, for complex reasons. Along with the world, I watched on television as he walked free. A day we never believed would come.

He was 71 when he was released. The way he conducted himself with incredible dignity and authority was amazingly impressive; for once a hero lived up to our expectations. He worked to bring people together and create a positive future. When apartheid was ended and he became president of South Africa, he was very careful to encourage people to be positive about living together and to discourage revenge. To help with this he set up a "Truth and Reconciliation Comission" which worked to bring out the truth of what had happened under apartheid and then move on positively, including white people in the process. In my opinion, this was a brilliant move - he knew it was a bad idea to squash the white people as his people had been squashed - no good would have come from it.

He still lives and is to me and many others, the most powerful symbol I have ever known of the struggle for freedom for all people. So many great hopes are never realised and end in sorrow, so it felt incredibly moving when he was released. These victories are rare. It gave me and others hope for the future that things can change for the better.

There is much more to this story. Less has changed in terms of who has the wealth in South Africa than we hoped...
post #2 of 7
A great write-up, Hirch. A moment worth noting.
post #3 of 7
I will add that I had never believed it possible for a transition to majority rule could happen peacefully. Never. I don't know how Mandela, the ANC, and black South Africans found the fortitude, restraint, and patience to make such a change. Their model will shine through history.

When Mandela made his first post-release trip to NYC, I kept my children home from school so that we could attend the parade. We waited for hours along the parade route downtown. The moment came, my children waved, and we bore witness. It was a thrilling moment.
post #4 of 7
Hmmm, I'd say pretty well simplified for a 9 year old but some areas were

1. A) a little vague like "they had a system called "apartheid" which meant that the white people were very rich and controlled everything; ... the black people were kept very poor." Seems to gloss over many finer points. It sounds like white guys made a system to keep themselves rich and black people poor and that's it. The system itself had many more points of "control" and segregation that I think would be useful to explain more about how exactly they government did this and perhaps some of their beliefs for doing so. Not to support them, just to explain what they thought and how they did it. It might also not hurt to explain that it wasn't ALL white people who supported this system... I know many white families that left because of this. just saying.
B) things like "F.W. De Clerk agreed to release him, for complex reasons"... those are important details to the story IMO. It gives insight into the process of how political figures make decisions or how systems change/adapt.
C) "Less has changed in terms of who has the wealth in South Africa than we hoped..." There's a lot more to this... I mean you could talk about a few things that changed when the ANC took power, and perhaps some of the reasons why things aren't all they were promised to be. while an enforced white power was immoral, like many dictatorships, it was at least somewhat controlled and consistent. Looking at the state of affairs 20 years later, the country has some serious problems to sort out, and I think some of them are the fault of the new government and it's policies and methods. Mandela himself is in important figure, but people are judged on what they and their followers do, not say.

2. There's a few points where the author's opinion, one which is sounds to me pretty resentful/bitter appears too strongly ("Of course the white government called Mandela a terrorist" - i mean consider your opening "Nelson Mandela was a member of the military wing (i.e. they had guns and used violence)")


This is in no way a criticism of what you believe or anything personal. I think that the "brief" could use some work thought, mostly in presenting a few more details and explaining both sides of the story, which seems more about what the text is about then Mandela himself. There's nothing about him growing up, what he believed in, why, anything he actually did, why specifically he was imprisoned, his actions while in prison, why he was released, the results of that release, what he promised, etc...


"Power to the People"
"Let Freedom Ring"
post #5 of 7
I missed that one. Will it be a special edition in a fancy bottle?
post #6 of 7
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master-Classter View Post

Hmmm, I'd say pretty well simplified for a 9 year old but some areas were

1. A) a little vague like "they had a system called "apartheid" which meant that the white people were very rich and controlled everything; ... the black people were kept very poor." Seems to gloss over many finer points. It sounds like white guys made a system to keep themselves rich and black people poor and that's it. The system itself had many more points of "control" and segregation that I think would be useful to explain more about how exactly they government did this and perhaps some of their beliefs for doing so. Not to support them, just to explain what they thought and how they did it. It might also not hurt to explain that it wasn't ALL white people who supported this system... I know many white families that left because of this. just saying.
B) things like "F.W. De Clerk agreed to release him, for complex reasons"... those are important details to the story IMO. It gives insight into the process of how political figures make decisions or how systems change/adapt.
C) "Less has changed in terms of who has the wealth in South Africa than we hoped..." There's a lot more to this... I mean you could talk about a few things that changed when the ANC took power, and perhaps some of the reasons why things aren't all they were promised to be. while an enforced white power was immoral, like many dictatorships, it was at least somewhat controlled and consistent. Looking at the state of affairs 20 years later, the country has some serious problems to sort out, and I think some of them are the fault of the new government and it's policies and methods. Mandela himself is in important figure, but people are judged on what they and their followers do, not say.

2. There's a few points where the author's opinion, one which is sounds to me pretty resentful/bitter appears too strongly ("Of course the white government called Mandela a terrorist" - i mean consider your opening "Nelson Mandela was a member of the military wing (i.e. they had guns and used violence)")


This is in no way a criticism of what you believe or anything personal. I think that the "brief" could use some work thought, mostly in presenting a few more details and explaining both sides of the story, which seems more about what the text is about then Mandela himself. There's nothing about him growing up, what he believed in, why, anything he actually did, why specifically he was imprisoned, his actions while in prison, why he was released, the results of that release, what he promised, etc...


"Power to the People"
"Let Freedom Ring"

The point was just to communicate the depth of feeling which was engendered by these events for me, and about thoughts of hope. My son knows my general views and diesn't need a purely objective account. The hope was just to engage him and details can follow.
I know this was bordering on political, but I hoped to keep it more about my feelings than anything else, so I will not be drawn to argue specific points, though I would add that if this was on an appropriate politics board I would certainly do so.
post #7 of 7
Sure, I really have no intention of being controversial or arguing. Just thought I'd point out some places where I thought the writeup could expand. No hard feelings.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Off topic
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › General Discussion › Off topic › Nelson Mandela released twenty years ago today.