After much waiting my bottle of Rumba will arrive on or before the 25th. I have read so many reviews that I am confused. The bee's wax and church incense, caramelized plumb, etc. are all descriptions so, non-minimalist that Monsieur Ellena's involvement suggests I have to try this one. So, I call upon those who have this fragrance in their wardrobe to pull it out, dust it off and let's have a group test, or for some a retest of Rumba. Can the sum really exceed the total of its' parts? So, goes the mystique attached to Rumba and if it were said of anyone but J.C.Ellena I would say it could not be done.
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Female Fragrance Discussion › J.C.Ellena's Iberian Passion.
Recent Reviews
-
The spice cabinet has been neglected in perfumery. I imagine this has to do with perfume producers not wanting to be pinned down by the literal, the prosaic, the kitchen. From the consumer...
-
Lacoste Challenge comes out of the bottle with citrus notes followed by the woodsy finishing notes. Very nice fragrance... The projection, sillage, and longevity are average, or perhaps...
-
This is a surprising fragrance that has an initial attack similar to cedar (but cedar is not listed in the notes). In the dry-down, It quickly changes to a slightly-powdery, sweet fragrance...
-
I bought this thinking that it was Versace Pour Homme, I should've remembered better but I didn't. I was bummed, but decided to try it anyways, and it was just so friggin' strong I couldn't...
-
This fragrance is currently my favorite and has been since I tried it. I'm actually very disappointed that summer is arriving because it doesn't smell like a summer scent so I won't be able to...
J.C.Ellena's Iberian Passion.
post #2 of 13
2/22/10 at 12:28am
- the_good_life
- offline
- Gender:

- 5,619 Posts. Joined 6/2006
- Location: Friedberg (Hessen)
- Select All Posts By This User
post #3 of 13
2/22/10 at 6:23pm
post #4 of 13
2/23/10 at 1:10am
- the_good_life
- offline
- Gender:

- 5,619 Posts. Joined 6/2006
- Location: Friedberg (Hessen)
- Select All Posts By This User
post #5 of 13
2/23/10 at 6:26am
post #6 of 13
2/23/10 at 9:50am
- noggs
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,120 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: Dhahran
- Select All Posts By This User
I think Rumba is now owned by the Ted Lapidus brand. I have a bottle of Balenciaga Rumba, and just recently an SA gave me a bottle of Rumba in a white tester box as a gift, and Ted Lapidus is printed clearly on the box. The bottles look the same except that one has Balenciaga printed on the front and the other has Ted Lapidus. Also, the gold plate on the top of the bottle is stamped with TL instead of BB and the Lapidus bottle has a clear sticker on the back listing ingredients and other information. The juice in the Lapidus bottle is noticeably lighter than the juice in the Balenciaga bottle.
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs
post #7 of 13
2/23/10 at 9:59am
My bottle of Rumba says BB, and the box says Balenciaga. It starts out so strong I chose to decant it into a roll on vial to control the application better. After about an hour or so, it tames down and becomes really soft and beautiful. It lasts far beyond 24 hours, I have to shower it off if I want it gone.
- N_Tesla
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,568 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Location: The Golden West
- Select All Posts By This User
noggs; Thanks for the information. I hope it is the Balenciaga version too or back it goes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by noggs 
I think Rumba is now owned by the Ted Lapidus brand. I have a bottle of Balenciaga Rumba, and just recently an SA gave me a bottle of Rumba in a white tester box as a gift, and Ted Lapidus is printed clearly on the box. The bottles look the same except that one has Balenciaga printed on the front and the other has Ted Lapidus. Also, the gold plate on the top of the bottle is stamped with TL instead of BB and the Lapidus bottle has a clear sticker on the back listing ingredients and other information. The juice in the Lapidus bottle is noticeably lighter than the juice in the Balenciaga bottle.
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs

I think Rumba is now owned by the Ted Lapidus brand. I have a bottle of Balenciaga Rumba, and just recently an SA gave me a bottle of Rumba in a white tester box as a gift, and Ted Lapidus is printed clearly on the box. The bottles look the same except that one has Balenciaga printed on the front and the other has Ted Lapidus. Also, the gold plate on the top of the bottle is stamped with TL instead of BB and the Lapidus bottle has a clear sticker on the back listing ingredients and other information. The juice in the Lapidus bottle is noticeably lighter than the juice in the Balenciaga bottle.
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs
post #9 of 13
2/23/10 at 7:34pm
- noggs
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,120 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: Dhahran
- Select All Posts By This User
I checked the Ted Lapidus website, and Rumba is listed as one of their products. I think the license changed hands in 2009.
Just a few more comments. It is indeed extremely long lasting, even at EDT strength, which is what I have. It is also quite strong, especially in the early stages, so few sprays are needed. I get the beeswax, or what I perceive as beeswax, in the drydown. It has a mellowing effect on the other elements, and acts to bind them together. While the deep drydown is not as loud and effusive as the earlier stages, I would still have to label this as a rather flamboyant fragrance overall.
noggs
Just a few more comments. It is indeed extremely long lasting, even at EDT strength, which is what I have. It is also quite strong, especially in the early stages, so few sprays are needed. I get the beeswax, or what I perceive as beeswax, in the drydown. It has a mellowing effect on the other elements, and acts to bind them together. While the deep drydown is not as loud and effusive as the earlier stages, I would still have to label this as a rather flamboyant fragrance overall.
noggs
post #10 of 13
2/23/10 at 9:01pm
- N_Tesla
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,568 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Location: The Golden West
- Select All Posts By This User
Ok, here is the update. I did finally receive Rumba and unfortunately have to confirm that Rumba is no longer by Balenciaga. The bottle I got came in a box clearly stating Rumba and Ted Lapidus. Is it reformulated? I don't know personally but if it is, then there goes another fragrance down the reformulation tube. From what I have heard Rumba is a power house and this Rumba that I received is IMO not.
- N_Tesla
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,568 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Location: The Golden West
- Select All Posts By This User
noggs; You are correct. The bottle I received is indeed marked as Rumba, Ted Lapidus. Another sad turn of events.
Quote:
Originally Posted by noggs 
I think Rumba is now owned by the Ted Lapidus brand. I have a bottle of Balenciaga Rumba, and just recently an SA gave me a bottle of Rumba in a white tester box as a gift, and Ted Lapidus is printed clearly on the box. The bottles look the same except that one has Balenciaga printed on the front and the other has Ted Lapidus. Also, the gold plate on the top of the bottle is stamped with TL instead of BB and the Lapidus bottle has a clear sticker on the back listing ingredients and other information. The juice in the Lapidus bottle is noticeably lighter than the juice in the Balenciaga bottle.
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs

I think Rumba is now owned by the Ted Lapidus brand. I have a bottle of Balenciaga Rumba, and just recently an SA gave me a bottle of Rumba in a white tester box as a gift, and Ted Lapidus is printed clearly on the box. The bottles look the same except that one has Balenciaga printed on the front and the other has Ted Lapidus. Also, the gold plate on the top of the bottle is stamped with TL instead of BB and the Lapidus bottle has a clear sticker on the back listing ingredients and other information. The juice in the Lapidus bottle is noticeably lighter than the juice in the Balenciaga bottle.
After doing a quick comparison, I think there are differences. The Balenciaga starts out sharper but becomes very full, fruity, floral, and dark. The Lapidus starts out softer, and while the two become more similar after a few minutes, the Lapidus seems lighter, fresher, not as dark and rich as the Balenciaga. I can't say for sure but I think there has been some reformulation of Rumba. Neither can I say whether this might have happened in Balenciaga's hands or after the rights were transferred to Lapidus'.
I like this fragrance, and my familiarity is with the Balenciaga version, not the Lapidus version. It is very fruity and floral, nearly over the top at first, but as it settles down a tart, dark, plummy, woody backbone comes through, preventing the fragrance from staying overwhelmingly feminine. It flirts with powder for a while but I do not consider the drydown to be powdery.
I'm on the fence about Rumba as far as wearing it. Yes, I wear it at home occasionally, but so far I haven't worn it outside. Sometimes I think it would be fine, and it probably would be, but other times it seems too florally feminine and a bit too fruity to me.
Let us know what you think. I hope you got the Balenciaga version.
noggs
post #13 of 13
2/24/10 at 8:06pm
- noggs
- offline
- Gender:

- 4,120 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: Dhahran
- Select All Posts By This User
That's disappointing. Was it advertised as being manufactured by Balenciaga or Lapidus? You might consider returning it if it isn't what you ordered.
The Balenciaga catalog is in a pretty bad state these days. Nearly every fragrance they made that was worth a damn has either been discontinued or sold.
The Balenciaga catalog is in a pretty bad state these days. Nearly every fragrance they made that was worth a damn has either been discontinued or sold.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Female Fragrance Discussion
- J.C.Ellena's Iberian Passion.
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Female Fragrance Discussion › J.C.Ellena's Iberian Passion.
Currently, there are 520 Active Users
(38 Members and 482 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Fragrance you like that gets bashed? 46 seconds ago
- › Usernames containing certain letters have suddenly been changed? 1 minute ago
- › Summer Scent thoughts 1 minute ago
- › do you really think real fecal are added to fragrance to get the... 2 minutes ago
- › Fragrance directory is terrible 3 minutes ago
- › Reviews? New Reviews?? How to find them? How to get to write them?... 8 minutes ago
- › TAPATALK not working at all. 9 minutes ago
- › What is this flower? Is there anything like it? 10 minutes ago
- › HELP!! Perfume for first day of work 11 minutes ago
- › What is the woodiest masculine scent ever? 11 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Silver Jeans Homme by Roccobarocco, 1995 by littleprince
- › Bois D'Ascèse by Naomi Goodsir, 2012 by jtd
- › Lacoste Challenge by Lacoste, 2009 by OCNBreeze7
- › Original Penguin Reserve by Original Penguin, 2013 by thines01
- › Versace L'Homme by Versace, 1984 by kodepop
- › Arabian Nights by J del Pozo, 2010 by mlsweeney
- › Truth Calvin Klein Men by Calvin Klein, 2002 by conkhi
- › Ice*Men by Thierry Mugler, 2007 by conkhi
- › A*Men : Les Parfums De Cuir by Thierry Mugler, 2012 by conkhi
- › A*Men : Le Gôut Du Parfum / The Taste Of Fragrance [hot Chili... by conkhi
View: More Reviews
New Fragrance Wikis
- › UK FiFi Award winners 2013 by Grant
- › UK FiFi Awards tonight. by Grant
- › Groups Guidelines by Grant Osborne
- › Buy, Sell, Trade Rules by Grant Osborne
- › Following And Followers by Grant Osborne
- › Search And Advanced Search Tutorial by Grant Osborne
- › Tagging Tutorial by Grant Osborne
- › Add A New Item Tutorial by Grant Osborne
- › Image And Video Tutorial by Grant Osborne
- › Subscription Tutorial by Grant Osborne
Home | Fragrance Product Guide | Forums | Fragrance Wikis | My Profile
About Basenotes | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Basenotes is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle
About Basenotes | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Basenotes is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle





!

