http://www.theage.com.au/news/fashio...339986871.html
this article is from 2006, but I found it fascinating. It's too long to summarize (three pages), but after reading it i've made a decision: I will no longer hold back when reviewing commercial crap. i've always treated these scents with 'light fingers' because they are popular and I didn't want to offend. But in this article it talks about how companies approach the perfume houses and say 'give me a little of this and a little that at the cheapest possible price.' No care for artistic aspects whatsoever.
But i will now become more artistic with my reviews :-)
this article is from 2006, but I found it fascinating. It's too long to summarize (three pages), but after reading it i've made a decision: I will no longer hold back when reviewing commercial crap. i've always treated these scents with 'light fingers' because they are popular and I didn't want to offend. But in this article it talks about how companies approach the perfume houses and say 'give me a little of this and a little that at the cheapest possible price.' No care for artistic aspects whatsoever.
But i will now become more artistic with my reviews :-)







