Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › Sexual Sugar Daddy - by Michel Germain (NEW)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sexual Sugar Daddy - by Michel Germain (NEW)

post #1 of 38
10/17/10 at 4:58pm
Thread Starter 
I have to say this sounds interesting Praline against Black Leather - could be interesting -




Eau de Toilette Spray

Hugs and kisses guaranteed with sexual sugar daddy. A splash of crystalized grapefruit zest mixes with deliciously tempting cinnamon bark to irresistibly charm. Highly addictive caramelized pralines are packaged in a rich, sexy leather note and the bold masculinity of sweet tobacco accord. Infused with ancient aphrodisiacs, it does the flirting for you. This is not your ordinary fragrance.

Fragrance Type: Chypre Oriental
Top Notes: Crystallized grapefruit zest, Cinnamon bark, Fir balsam
Middle Notes: Caramelized praline, French lavender, Patchouli
Heart Notes: Leather, Sweet tobacco accord, Sandalwood



http://www.michelgermain.com/

http://www.fragrantica.com/news/Sexu...main-1742.html
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 38
10/17/10 at 5:01pm
I thought I saw this today at my local marshals...could it hit the discounters that fast?

Edit: Nvm it was sexual secret
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 38
10/17/10 at 5:03pm
This does look very intriguing, usually I don't much care for newer frags anymore, but this looks very nice. Hopefully it will live up to these notes.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 38
10/17/10 at 5:11pm
Definitely sounds like it's worth at least a sniff/whiff. I'm gonna be on the lookout for this. Will it be carried by department stores or just bloomingdale's?
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 38
10/17/10 at 5:55pm
I will wait to sample before I say anything!
Gary
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 38
10/17/10 at 6:04pm
any testers out there ?
woops - it's @ Macy's online so a trip to the sto for sampling.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 38
10/17/10 at 6:19pm
This fragrance really needs to get together with Putain Des Palaces.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 38
10/17/10 at 6:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugandaraja View Post

This fragrance really needs to get together with Putain Des Palaces.

I'll attempt to start the research to test your theory.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 38
10/17/10 at 6:45pm
i want!!
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 38
10/17/10 at 7:11pm
I want...not!
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 38
10/21/10 at 8:15pm
  • KMF
  • offline
  • Gender:
Tested this today. Utterly mediocre...
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 38
10/21/10 at 8:17pm
I find the name offensive and wouldn't buy it on that alone!
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 38
10/21/10 at 8:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMF View Post

Tested this today. Utterly mediocre...

That's all?
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 38
10/21/10 at 9:21pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Cologneist View Post

That's all?

What more can you say about utter medriocrity?
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 38
10/22/10 at 11:06am
I love this awesome fragrance, especially the sugared grapefruit and the leather combination!
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 38
10/22/10 at 5:26pm
Thread Starter 
I tried this today at Macy's at first spray I was really impressed - like wow tobacco / patchouli against gourmand notes - almost felt like the female Angel.


Then it started to burn off really fast and then leather came out for about 20 minutes after that burnt off it smelled like the original Sexual - I guess that is the aphrodisiac signature note.
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 38
10/22/10 at 7:03pm
Can one with such a stupid name actually smell good?
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 38
10/22/10 at 9:15pm
  • KMF
  • offline
  • Gender:
Quote:
Originally Posted by scentimus View Post

I tried this today at Macy's at first spray I was really impressed - like wow tobacco / patchily against gourmand notes - almost felt like the female Angel.

Then it started to burn off really fast and then leather came out for about 20 minutes after that burnt off it smelled like the original Sexual - I guess that is the aphrodisiac signature note.

This is similar to my experience, except I didn't think that first hour was anything special. It's really strange how the scent just sort of disintegrated after 90 minutes or so. It's as if there weren't any base notes...
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 38
10/23/10 at 2:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMF View Post

This is similar to my experience, except I didn't think that first hour was anything special. It's really strange how the scent just sort of disintegrated after 90 minutes or so. It's as if there weren't any base notes...

This really pisses me off. Michel Germain had a unique opportunity to really take advantage of the foothold he had established within the retail industry but instead he decided to release some worthless drivel and squander his chance. I'm so tired of these pathetic offerings from brands capable of doing better. Even if he had released a Bleu de Chanel sniff-a-like I would have been more forgiving, but such pathetic attempts at fine perfumery just upset me.
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 38
12/4/10 at 7:42pm
I tried this today - it is quite vile.
Reply
Reply
post #21 of 38
12/4/10 at 8:43pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by petruccijc View Post

I tried this today - it is quite vile.

I didn't think it vile, I was sufficiently underwhelmed though.
Reply
Reply
post #22 of 38
12/5/10 at 12:35am
longevity has always been an issue with most men's frags
Reply
Reply
post #23 of 38
12/5/10 at 12:37am
then the ones that do last forever, A*Men/Bijan/etc, are rancid.
Reply
Reply
post #24 of 38
12/5/10 at 12:09pm
Original Sexual had great longevity and Siliage.

The notes in this one does have me quite curious though!
Reply
Reply
post #25 of 38
12/5/10 at 2:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by petruccijc View Post

I tried this today - it is quite vile.

It really is quite vile. I'm extremely disappointed by this shameless offering, but then again, what more did I expect?
Reply
Reply
post #26 of 38
12/6/10 at 1:24am
As has already been mentioned, the ridiculous name alone would deter me.
Reply
Reply
post #27 of 38
12/6/10 at 1:30am
Random acquaintance: So.. what did you get for Christmas?

You: Well, one thing I got was some Sexual Sugar Daddy.

Random acquaintance:
Reply
Reply
post #28 of 38
12/6/10 at 1:48am
Absolutely my point, SOS.

And you have to say it in a Barry White type voice.
Reply
Reply
post #29 of 38
12/6/10 at 6:29pm
I also do not like the name.....and I will not be making a purchase of this scent either.....This is not for me!!!
Gary
Reply
Reply
post #30 of 38
12/7/10 at 12:17am
If I let names bother me I wouldn't own half of my frags
Reply
Reply
post #31 of 38
7/13/12 at 3:06pm
I have this on my right arm right now. It's pretty bad. It smells like a mix of Mustang and like, and old school fragrance with a bergamot top note, I can't quite pinpoint which. I have had it on my skin about 20 minutes, and it's just getting worse and worse, I'm probably gonna try and wash it off here shortly.
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 38
7/13/12 at 3:32pm
I wrote it off because of the inept and stupid name. It crosses a line, IMO.
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 38
7/13/12 at 4:23pm
The fragrance industry regards us as mindless consumers. Is that not obvious when a fragrance such as this one is put out?
Reply
Reply
post #34 of 38
7/13/12 at 6:58pm
They'll do a Christmas Gift Set with a GIANT GOLD MEDALLION to wear around your Barry Gibb neck and hang on your bear rug all in 24K gold electroplate w/ graphite pearls that say "WHO'S YOUR DADDY?" You all watch: it will become a best seller!
So --YOU-- can say, in response to question above: "Oh! I got some Sexual Sugar Daddy and a pearl necklace!"
Reply
Reply
post #35 of 38
7/13/12 at 7:52pm
It sounds like it has a lot in common with Billionaire Boyfriend by Kate Walsh.
Reply
Reply
post #36 of 38
9/8/12 at 6:08am
LOL, I couldn't help but laugh!

Although I am also intrigued...hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Reply
Reply
post #37 of 38
9/8/12 at 6:14am
I have a feeling the Butthole Surfers wear Sexual Sugar Daddy. LOL.
Reply
Reply
post #38 of 38
9/8/12 at 6:22am
I'll be waiting for Sexual Sport Sugar Daddy and the Sexual Sugar Daddy Intense/Extreme flankers.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: MFD Archive
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › Sexual Sugar Daddy - by Michel Germain (NEW)