I got another batch of C42B11N01 today for the latest split and its excellent as per the previous three. Unfortunately I asked for the free samples to be Aventus too and they sent me six vials of A42B10K04 and the difference is staggering.
The samples have very poor longevity, Has next to no potency/projection and doesn't smell pleasant. If you think people may have been exaggerating in the past when saying its all ashy and has no top notes then I can assure you they weren't. Its absolutely dreadful and has none of the characteristic of a good bottle. Its got more in common with a toilet bleach and the majority of the notes just aren't there.
If peoples first encounter with Aventus is one of these late 2010 batches then I'm not surprised they think its not worth purchasing. It should never have been bottled and made available for people to purchase.
The samples have very poor longevity, Has next to no potency/projection and doesn't smell pleasant. If you think people may have been exaggerating in the past when saying its all ashy and has no top notes then I can assure you they weren't. Its absolutely dreadful and has none of the characteristic of a good bottle. Its got more in common with a toilet bleach and the majority of the notes just aren't there.
If peoples first encounter with Aventus is one of these late 2010 batches then I'm not surprised they think its not worth purchasing. It should never have been bottled and made available for people to purchase.







I have emailed ParfumsRaffy since Creed hasn't gotten back to me and they have C42B10K04 in stock, which according to some users here is a terrible ashy lot. Luckily, my friend has the same lot number and is sending me a 5ml sample so I can see for myself.
Then again I maybe wouldn't know also if I would not have to, so nevermind...in short: you have a pre-processing stage used for mixing and test batches. This is a laboratory setting located wherever your nose is at. The production stage covers the cycle all the way to bottling. NO niche house has the production stage inhouse - never ever, you'd be lacking economies of scale. BUT: with the production stage being outsourced, you don't pay a flat fee for "production", but you pay for each and every single step (conservation, RM iterations, bottling; along with which machinery you use - necessary as production facilities don't only output EDTs but also room scents), so you can decide which level of QA you want to have. Given what is reported here, it is easy to see for everyone involved in the industry what is going on: Creed drastically and intentionally saves on QA, both in preproduction and production. And no, they surely do not have an own bottling facility 