New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lady Gaga and Katy Perry scents

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
I know this is the MFD and I am off-topic, but am still wondering about this:

http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/purr-by-...lusive/3142365

Mods, can you move this to the Fragrance Industry area?
post #2 of 6
The Perry fragrance great bottle, horrid fragrance all cotton candy and fruity.

GaGa well she has said she wants it to smell of blood and semen. I can see Coty going for that one. NOT. But hell it would be interesting. LOL
post #3 of 6
Thread Starter 
I agree, Donna.

All celebuscents, IMO, must have mass appeal. I can see nothing really controversial or it will not sell to the general perfume-consuming public.

Celebuscents are all about the commercial endorsements of a celebrity and high sales numbers, followed, of course, by a flanker.
post #4 of 6
I agree about Coty & for that reason it wouldn't surprise me if the GaGa scent ends up being a second rate rip-off of Womanity.
post #5 of 6
A slightly off-topic question, not necessarily related to this thread: did something close to or somewhat equivalent to an incipient, emerging "celebuscent" phenomenon also during the heyday of dandyism during late 18th century - early 20th century?

I mean, while I know that the historical context was the one of a pre-industrial to early industrial society and mass consumerism, as well as the celebrity cult were by far not so developed, I still believe even then some fragrance houses cashed in on being the official perfumer of that age's Who's Who.
post #6 of 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken_Russell View Post

A slightly off-topic question, not necessarily related to this thread: did something close to or somewhat equivalent to an incipient, emerging "celebuscent" phenomenon also during the heyday of dandyism during late 18th century - early 20th century?

I mean, while I know that the historical context was the one of a pre-industrial to early industrial society and mass consumerism, as well as the celebrity cult were by far not so developed, I still believe even then some fragrance houses cashed in on being the official perfumer of that age's Who's Who.

I'm fairly certain you're right about this. I know that old ads from British newspapers tout various products such as soaps for being used by royals. I didn't look deeply at this, but I saw a few such instances when researching something else. Primrose? t_g_l?

One thing which surprised me was learning how important fashion was in the Roman empire. I think I must have thought it too frivolous or something - anyway, it surprised me, even if it shouldn't have.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: