Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › The Journey: Green, Bitter and Animalic
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Journey: Green, Bitter and Animalic

post #1 of 78
Thread Starter 
Last year right after I joined BN I launched a quest to find a signature scent:

http://www.basenotes.net/threads/277...Green-Animalic

Of course I ended up with a signature wardrobe, but that's a different story.

That thread was in Just Starting Out and is closed. stuigi recommended that I start a new thread here to continue my journey. Your input is greatly appreciated.

The fact is that there are indeed quite a few green animalics out there. I just found another one that I like the other day (Lancome Programme Homme). I want to see if there are even more, since it's obviously my favorite type of fragrance. So I thought I'd give you a good idea of what's already been covered so you don't have to read through that whole thread. Just check through the list to see whether your idea has already been covered.

These three are exemplary of what I'm looking for in a dry green animalic:

The very first fragrance recommended (by rompip) was Caron Yatagan of course. I doused myself real good the other nite again and I must say, it's simply a masterpiece. Very me, very wearable, very very good. Astonishly cheap, too.

SculptureOfSoul correctly predicted that I would like Bond's Harrods Swarovski Ltd Edition Oud Sandwich no Mayo Extra Pickles with a Side of Well-Done Fries. That is a mysterious green animalic earthy masterpiece. It makes me proud of my country to know it was produced here, even if the perfumer is a dirty foreigner.

I believe my own research led me to the terrific Ungaro I which lies on the patchouli end of bitter. I find myself often drawn to its "transition" era of masculines (1987-1994).

Other non-sweet green animalics in my frequent rotation include:

Amber & Lavender - Jo Malone
Baie de Genièvre - Creed
Boss Sport
Esencia Loewe
Feuilles de Tabac - Miller Harris
Programme Homme - Lancome
Sud Est - Romeo Gigli
Trophee - Lancome
Vendetta Uomo - Valentino


Here's a list of notes I simply do NOT like, which I figured out in my journey:

Birch Tar -- unfortunately often unlisted, this is the "smoky tar leather" of so many classic masculines such as Knize Ten, Quorum, One Man Show, etc. certain "leathers" are ok though, as in Fahrenheit, Esencia Loewe, Z-14 and Adolfo for Men -- no birch tar there.
Calone -- really don't like that synthetic aquatic thing. gives me a headache!
Dihydromyrcenol -- this is that transparent metallic floral note in Cool Water, GIT, Ungaro III, etc. Most synthetic floral molecules like this really bug me for some reason.
Ionones -- these are the classic soapy "violet" (NOT violet leaf) notes in frags like Grey Flannel. The closest I can get to that type of vibe is iris, which is okay but not my favorite.
Fruit Notes - this does not include citrus, which i like. what i mean is things like apple, plum, apricot, peach, etc. they are created with esters and lactones, which i'm not fond of.
Tomato Leaf -- not sure what the deal is with this one, as I usually LOVE leaf absolutes -- citrus leaf, magnolia leaf, violet leaf etc... tomato is just really annoying to me for some reason.
Aldehydes -- subtle use can be okay, but I generally avoid
Incense -- not as strict about this one but they tend not to work for me in green fragrances for some reason. the myrrh in Amber & Lavender and Harrods Oud are big exceptions, they are great.

So, generally my favorites have some combination of herbs, citrus, spices, masculine florals, roots, woods, and animalics. Favorite ingredients include wormwood/artemisia, violet leaf, marigold/tagetes, indoles, vetiver, oakmoss, cedar, fir, civet, castoreum, ambergris, & labdanum.


Tip: use your browser's find function to see whether your recommendation has already been covered.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Here is the list of fragrances covered in the old thread which I liked:

Agua Brava
Bois d'Orage
Bowling Green
Davidoff Zino
Dior Fahrenheit
Encre Noir
Epicea
Etro Vetiver
Gli Odori
Grain de Plaisir
Halston Z-14 (old formulation)
Bombay Sapphire Infusion
Lalique Equus
Lomani pH
Lorenzo Villoresi Uomo
Simon Chang Maestro
Jasper Conran Mister
Monsieur Leonard
Sycomore
Trefle Pur
Azzaro Visit
Givenchy Xeryus
Route de Vetiver
Torch
Aramis Tuscany
Witness
Ungaro II
Zirh Ikon
Celine Fever (except for the short longevity)
Victor Wall Street - ditto
Dana Herbissimo Mejorana - ditto
Clarins Eau Dynamisante - ditto
Carven Vetiver Dry
Italian Cypress
Tommy Bahama
Patyka Boise
Caravelle Epicee
Invasion Barbare
Gucci Envy
Wonderwood
Zents Ore
Eucris
vintage Fahrenheit


-----------------------------------------

Here's a list of all the fragrances that did NOT work for me:

Burberry Beat
Eau de The Vert
Jardin Apres le Mousson
Grey Vetiver
Terre d'Hermes
Jardin au le Nil
Declaration Essence
Citrus Paradisi
Hindu Grass
Memoir Man
Eau Divine
Dirty English
One Man Show
Bogart
Bandit
L'Anarchiste
Derby
Sous le Vent
Green Irish Tweed
Quorum
Eau de Campagne
Bandit
Papyrus de Ciane
Parfum d'Habit
Vetiver Extraordinaire
Pino Silvestre
Eloge d'un traitre
Grey Flannel
Acqua di Selva
Wood & Absinthe
Aromatics Elixir
Chanel No 19
Skarb
Complex (Boadicea the Victorious)
Comme des Garcons Calamus
Timbuktu
Comme Des Garcons Laurel
Profvmvm Fvmudvs
Profvmvm Victrix
Vierges et Toreros
Cipresso Di Toscana
Knize Ten
Van Cleef & Arpels pH
Polo Modern Reserve
Polo
Polo Crest
CdG Artek Standard
CdG Hinoki
Aramis
Halston 1-12
Nasomatto Absinth
Eau de Gloire
Li Altarelli
Antony Logistics Spirit
Fou D'Absinthe
Fleurs de Sel
Cypres-Musc
Potpourri
L'Eau Trois
Salvador Dali PH
Le Seducteur
Baime
Iskander
Mazzolari
Perfect Man Alternative
Aramis Portos
Devin
Virigilio
Lauder for Men
Cuba Green
Paco Rabanne pH
Brut Classic
Eau de Lierre
Phileas
Eau de Quinine
Ban Zai
Vetiver-Racinettes
Ayalitta
Rainforest
Gaucho
ArbitRary
Harmatan Noir
Eau de Gentiane blanche
Angelique Sous la Pluie
Barbier des Iles
Bijan
Safari
Sung Homme
Coriolan
Cool Wave
Duc de Vervins
Jack Black Silver Mark
Chaleur d'Animale
Carven homme
John Sterling
Joseph Abboud
Bobby Jones
Deauville
Mark Birley
Derrick
Rive Gauche pH
Green Jeans
Pasha
Sienna
Chene
Patchouli Leaves
Vetiver Ambrato
Eau de Vetiver
Worth Pour Homme Concentree
Profumi del Forte By Night
M/Mink
Baudelaire
Askew
Estroverso
Krizia Uomo
Givenchy Gentleman
Pino Fifty
Nero Scuro
Bogart Eau Fresh
Alliage
Live Jazz
Magnolia Romana
Adidas Sport Field
Ferrari Racing
Diesel Zero Plus
Cartier Declaration
Action Uomo
Smalto pH
Corduroy
Sir Irisch Moos
Cerruti 1881
Cardin Musk
Quorum Silver
Troisiemme Homme
Patrick
Jo Malones besides Amber & Lavender
Green Water
Intimately
Instinct
Eccelso
Itasca
Esprit du Roi
English Fern
Jules
Sergio Tacchini pH
Chez Bond
Heritage
Ormonde Man
Paco Rabanne Eau de Sport
Victor V Club



It's been a busy year as you can see!

Can you think of any more green, bitter, animalic fragrances? I appreciate your input.
post #2 of 78
That proper research, that is!
post #3 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoombung View Post

That proper research, that is!

Either that or OCD...
post #4 of 78
you covered a lot of ground, OMG Good work Monkeybars. I've to close my eyes while reading some of the fragrances that didn't work for you, though
post #5 of 78
I'll add Smell Bent: Totem Eclipse (Animalic only because of the vegetal musk but paired with red cedar and dense jungle like greens) and Otter Luvr (Castoreum, musk, ambergris and algae and aquatic - I know you don't like the aquatic greens but you've tried pretty much everything else available!)
Maybe also Slumberhouse Rume due to the labdanum and I consider bay leaf pretty bitter but then theres a fair dose of coca cola sweetness too.
post #6 of 78
Great work MonkeyBars. That particular thread is a classic. More guys should put in that kind of effort, instead of the "recommend me a scent, any scent, as long as its Creed or Tom Ford" garbage..... ( of course, there are lots of people who really are not interested in fragrances, so they can go about it as they want I suppose).

Glad you found some good fragrances. Your organization is this thread is well done.

PS : I too became sad when reading some of the fragrances that did not work for you !
post #7 of 78
Your list covers pretty much the whole universe ... and I'm sad to see you don't like my favorite, Bandit. (and, btw, I'm wearing Krizia uomo as I write).

Cannot think of anything else covering the three bases. Very bitter and very animalic is Rien by ELdO (leather, but not birch tar, more like Dzing! so who knows,you might enjoy). But there's no green whatsoever. Green and bitter there are the Ormonde woman and man (woman is better, the man has some synthetic aquatic feel I don't like): green bitter forest. But no animals. Perhaps a layering experiment? You're giving me an idea ...

cacio
post #8 of 78
Oh, that was your thread! I remember it well, having found it charming ages ago when I stumbled upon it. I had no idea its poster stuck around and became a seasoned basenoter. You've certainly followed your own path - few of your rotated, but carefully chosen, fragrances are much talked about.

I wish I had the courage to try Yatagan, one of these days! Three times, I have approached its tester bottle, applied a little to a test card, paled, and backed away, not daring to apply it to my skin.

Permit me to recommend Maria Candida Gentile's 'Gershwin.' It is bitter and green from end to end. There is a _mote_ of frankincense, which I noted you usually dislike, but here it has the charm (in my opinion) of feeling unconventional. 'Frankincense? Whatever are you doing here?'
post #9 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfarom View Post

you covered a lot of ground, OMG Good work Monkeybars. I've to close my eyes while reading some of the fragrances that didn't work for you, though

Yeah I know I turned down some classics. My extreme sensitivity to birch tar is the culprit behind as many as half of them. Many of them were near-misses, and many I liked but just weren't right for me in particular. (Of course a few I just thought were horrible. But the suggestions on the whole were SO good that I respected virtually all of those compositions.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by forfreddie View Post

I'll add Smell Bent: Totem Eclipse (Animalic only because of the vegetal musk but paired with red cedar and dense jungle like greens) and Otter Luvr (Castoreum, musk, ambergris and algae and aquatic - I know you don't like the aquatic greens but you've tried pretty much everything else available!)
Maybe also Slumberhouse Rume due to the labdanum and I consider bay leaf pretty bitter but then theres a fair dose of coca cola sweetness too.

Awesome, I have not tried the Smell Bents -- I know about Otter Luvr and was curious about it. I'm still waiting for a seaweed frag to bowl me over -- not all marine scents have Calone thank goodness. Anyone who actually has more ideas after checking the lists above deserves thanks! I actually just got the Slumberhouse sampler pack and enjoyed them. They're more woodsy and spicy than green of course. Soon I will get around to wearing them. I think layering may be the way to go, Grev's rich amber along with a more dry woody might be a nice round golden thing (not really for this thread of course).

Quote:
Originally Posted by cacio View Post

Cannot think of anything else covering the three bases. Very bitter and very animalic is Rien by ELdO (leather, but not birch tar, more like Dzing! so who knows,you might enjoy). But there's no green whatsoever. Green and bitter there are the Ormonde woman and man (woman is better, the man has some synthetic aquatic feel I don't like): green bitter forest.

Okay, I will give Rien a shot though I was not impressed by Dzing particularly. Tried Ormonde Man, forgot to put it on the list, I will add. It's too aldehydic for my taste. Thanks though!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merely View Post

Oh, that was your thread! I remember it well, having found it charming ages ago when I stumbled upon it.

Why thank you

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merely View Post

I wish I had the courage to try Yatagan, one of these days! Three times, I have approached its tester bottle, applied a little to a test card, paled, and backed away, not daring to apply it to my skin.

Animalic frags like that -- Ungaro II I called "animalic and weird" when I tried it on paper, while old-school Creeds just kind of sit there on the blotter -- need skin to bloom. I found the Yat intriguing but strange at first, then I kinda liked it, now I love it. Ungaro II as well, which is a civet bomb.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merely View Post

Permit me to recommend Maria Candida Gentile's 'Gershwin.' It is bitter and green from end to end. There is a _mote_ of frankincense, which I noted you usually dislike, but here it has the charm (in my opinion) of feeling unconventional. 'Frankincense? Whatever are you doing here?'

I will give it a shot! Extra points for finding an obscure one I've never heard of before. I like frankincense but haven't come across a usage that vibes with me yet and would be excited to find one. (I assume green notes need to be piled onto it as in Eau des Iles.)
post #10 of 78
Mailed yesterday: Gengis Khan (green, bitter, medicinal Mongolian), de Bachmakov (bitter, green, drunk Russian), Petroleum (bilgey warm oud), and JAR Shadow (mustard vetiver with alien carnation)
post #11 of 78
The following do not each individually meet the three elements you list, but I suspect given what you like, you may like these fragrances:

Lancome Sagamore
Givenchy Insense
Nino Cerruti Pour Homme
Parfums de Nicolaï Haute Provence Eau de Lavande (original formulation)
Davidoff Zino Davidoff
Hermès Eau des Merveilles
Captain Molyneux
Loewe Pour Homme

Check your messages.

scentemental
post #12 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Chambers View Post

Mailed yesterday: Gengis Khan (green, bitter, medicinal Mongolian), de Bachmakov (bitter, green, drunk Russian), Petroleum (bilgey warm oud), and JAR Shadow (mustard vetiver with alien carnation)

Let me know if you ever run for office Brian. I'll volunteer for your campaign...

scentemental, I'm quite curious about all of those except Zino, which I already dig (terrific civet and lavender! though it's a bit sweet-vanillic for this thread). we can make that part of our ongoing swap. thanks for reading bro.
post #13 of 78
I owned Balmain Ebene a while ago. Bitter, classy, dry-herbal fragrance. Not my thing, but I feel it definitely could be your kind of thing.
post #14 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

. . . scentemental, I'm quite curious about all of those except Zino, which I already dig (terrific civet and lavender! though it's a bit sweet-vanillic for this thread). we can make that part of our ongoing swap. thanks for reading bro.

Always happy to oblige, especially on such a carefully thought out post. The check is in the mail, so to speak.
post #15 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugandaraja View Post

I owned Balmain Ebene a while ago. Bitter, classy, dry-herbal fragrance. Not my thing, but I feel it definitely could be your kind of thing.

Hm. Given the 1983 production date and the leather listing, I was assuming the rare Ebene contained birch tar, and subsequently ignored it. Anyone want to chime in?
post #16 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Hm. Given the 1983 production date and the leather listing, I was assuming the rare Ebene contained birch tar, and subsequently ignored it. Anyone want to chime in?

I have a 150ml spray bottle in my collection of what I assume to be the old or original version since I have had it for more than twenty years. It's bitter and herbal for sure. Wouldn't be able to tell if there were birch tar in it though.
post #17 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Hm. Given the 1983 production date and the leather listing, I was assuming the rare Ebene contained birch tar, and subsequently ignored it. Anyone want to chime in?

In my opinion, it's not tarry at all. It's more chypric than anything.
post #18 of 78
Perhaps not bitter but have you tried Tenere?
post #19 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by laph View Post

Perhaps not bitter but have you tried Tenere?

Looks very interesting with that loud honey note, but the "leather" sounds like birch tar to me . . .
post #20 of 78
I don't get much in the way of leather and don't get any birch tar.
post #21 of 78
Have you tried just tinctured oakmoss?
post #22 of 78
Devin is green and bitter but not anamalic, two out of three is not bad.lol
post #23 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Looks very interesting with that loud honey note, but the "leather" sounds like birch tar to me . . .

On Your negative list one finds a lot of archetypical "green/bitter/animalic" frags. They are on it not only due to no-go-ingredients. For instance the classic Bandit could fit the profile - to my understanding - pretty well without touching any tabu.

I doubt that Your understanding of the classification categories matches common usage. Of course it is easily found that buzz words like 'green' don't mean too much. Did You - according to the given demand - really like Wonderwood and too Clarins Eau Dynamisante and too Encre Noir and Davidoff Zino too?! I think it's a wide spread taste, which is a good thing. But for which reason isn't Your liking strong enough to stick to one of the positive list?

In order to help You out, what kind of message should the fragrance send out to others? Is it intended to alarm people like the smell of an elk in the woods? Or should it serve as an air refresher, reminding coworkers of lucky days in spring at the zoo?
post #24 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
I don't get much in the way of leather and don't get any birch tar.

Thanks laph, I'll give Tenere a shot.

Quote:
Have you tried just tinctured oakmoss?

Yeah. It's kind of murky and salty. Love it as an ingredient but I don't find it all that interesting to wear on its own.

Quote:
Devin is green and bitter but not anamalic, two out of three is not bad.lol

Devin is on the "no go" list . . . I got birch tar from it

Quote:
On Your negative list one finds a lot of archetypical "green/bitter/animalic" frags. They are on it not only due to no-go-ingredients. For instance the classic Bandit could fit the profile - to my understanding - pretty well without touching any tabu.

The leather in Bandit bothered me. I could swear it has birch tar, but maybe its those phenols or another "leather" ingeredient. I didn't find it all that green. That may very well be because leather ingredients often overwhelm compositions to my nose; it's almost all I can smell.

Quote:
Did You - according to the given demand - really like Wonderwood and too Clarins Eau Dynamisante and too Encre Noir and Davidoff Zino too?! I think it's a wide spread taste, which is a good thing. But for which reason isn't Your liking strong enough to stick to one of the positive list?

Actually I find Wonderwood green, not sweet, and animalic (coniferous and musky) the Clarins very green, Encre Noir bitter and a little animalic (musk, some people consider vetiver green though i usually don't), and Zino green and animalic, I agree they're not really for this category. However those were recommendations from people on my old thread and I happened to like them, so they're listed up there. Sorry if that confuses you. That was partly why there are 2 sections above it listing the template and rotation fragrances which have a stronger "match percentage."

Quote:
In order to help You out, what kind of message should the fragrance send out to others? Is it intended to alarm people like the smell of an elk in the woods? Or should it serve as an air refresher, reminding coworkers of lucky days in spring at the zoo?

Good question. I covered this more on my old thread, mentioning things on the lines of "making love in a factory with potted herbs everywhere" and "a black jaguar sliding through poisonous plants in the deep dark jungle." In general it should not be a "friendly green fresh fields and flowers" scent. More on the alarming side, or "challenging" as I like to put it. You'll notice I listed Yatagan first, and for good reason.
post #25 of 78
Maybe Parfumerie Generale's Querelle. There's a bit of sweetness to it though.
post #26 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nasenmann View Post

Maybe Parfumerie Generale's Querelle. There's a bit of sweetness to it though.

Had been staying away due to the incense in the pyramid and people detecting "leather" in it...
post #27 of 78
Well, the incense is not very prominent, imo. I get some leather and I'd say it's more of a "buttery" nature but I can't really tell if there's birch tar or not. It ticks the green/bitter/animalic-boxes though, so should you get the opportunity to sample it, I'd recommend that you do.
post #28 of 78
Thread Starter 
Brian's package arrived. What a gentleman.

JAR Shadow: Haven't done a full wearing yet, but I find this a rather simple, elegant smell. I would say it lies on the border of what is generally considered "personal scent" -- it could easily be used as a room scent or soap fragrance -- and as such is certainly unisex if used in that capacity. I assume Brian's surprised reaction to Shadow is due to unfamiliarity with the primary top accord built on clove leaf, whose clove and green elements can remind one of sweet pickles (without the vinegar). There may even be a touch of dill oil. Clove is at work in the heart for certain, along with a touch of rosewood/howood/linalool, and possibly even a bit of coriander, pushing the pickle metaphor further. The lovely Australian sandalwood base has some labdanum and possibly even a bit of balsam (tolu?) as well. The base shares similarities with the heavier, denser Slumberhouse Grev. I'm quite certain I could make a reasonable facsimile of this fragrance, though it would take a bit of time to get all the balances correct given the maceration rate of naturals. (I find I need to wait two weeks to judge a given blend.) All in all, I prefer a bit more complexity. I was working on a clove leaf composition that had some promise a while back, which also featured howood (a natural combination), but had more going on in the base with some frankincense.

Histoires de Parfum Petroleum: Definitely get the band aid thing here (phenols?) and oud, along with some nylon outgas (adoxal?). There seems to be a little sweet amber in the background, but this one is way too chemically for my taste.

The Different Company de Bachmakov: Big raw dough accord up front, possibly something along the lines of copaiba balsam, cilantro and kari (curry) leaf. Pew, never liked the smell of dough. Ah I read now that it's shiso leaf, that makes sense. It's certainly not sweet!

Marc de la Morandiere Genghis Khan: While those previous three are decidedly contemporary and the last two are avant-garde to my nose, this one is a baroque construction that is definitely of its late-80s time frame. Rather than pointing to the future as Cool Water did, GK takes the 80s density idea to an extreme, as Furyo and Ungaro I did around the same time, but choosing a path roughly between those two (animalic sweet incense and animalic green patchouli, respectively). It has gads of castoreum and some musk, as well as funky bitter patchouli and a lot of other stuff going on. It's not as dry and well-structured as Ungaro I due to the prominent amber, but I like it! Surprisingly, the scent becomes quiet rather quickly after the opening hour, but I will assume the longevity is quite good as a skin scent. Thanks Brian, I had assumed I'd like this bomb and I do. Now I just need to find a bottle . . .
post #29 of 78
Interesting reviews Monkeybars!
Thanks for posting your thoughts
post #30 of 78
Fascinating journey - thanks for sharing - I dont think anything in my own range is going to prove animalic enough for you, though Artemis is fairly challenging and certainly very green and bitter.

Dont make the mistake of assuming anything listing a leather note will have birch tar in it: there are lots of good alternatives that are more commonly used (safraleine and castoreum come to mind in particular) that you might enjoy.

So many fragrances, so little time . . .
post #31 of 78
I though Vetiver Extraordinaire might be the perfect fragrance to fit this description, but I see that it unfortunately didn't work for you. Very impressive search though, good luck finding what you're after.
post #32 of 78
Very interesting to read your take on these. I immediately sprayed De Bachmakov to see if I could smell raw dough, and I'm struggling. I may have hallucinated Play Doh for a nanosecond, but I think it may have been the power of suggestion. I'm going to wear it tomorrow and see if I get it. Aside from the shiso, most of what's going on in dB is a bit of a mystery to me.

I think I've come to the same conclusion on Petroleum. I wanted to like it, but I don't think I can wear it. And I will wear pretty much anything.

Very happy to know that clove can smell tangy like JAR Shadow. That solves a big mystery. (Although I'm a little embarrassed that you thought the pickle accord was reported by me; I was responding to other reviews and don't actually find it to be pickly--just tangy as if from mustard seed.) I also find it very hard to dismantle JAR Shadow because it's polished like a gemstone: there are simply no edges to grab onto and say, "it's this!", though you've done a much better job than I. The point where we diverge is that I don't find it simple at all. On the surface, it is certainly uniform, sort of like the way Anthony Hopkins in The Remains of the Day speaks very few words and never fails to be utterly composed. But I find its juxtapositions original and full of tension. For its short lifespan, it holds my interest intently. That it's so inscrutable only makes me want it more.

Glad you like Gengis Khan. I'm having trouble making friends with it. I layered it with Trefle Pur the other day, and that was actually nice. Sometimes you just need someone else to make the introduction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

JAR Shadow: Haven't done a full wearing yet, but I find this a rather simple, elegant smell. I would say it lies on the border of what is generally considered "personal scent" -- it could easily be used as a room scent or soap fragrance -- and as such is certainly unisex if used in that capacity. I assume Brian's surprised reaction to Shadow is due to unfamiliarity with the primary top accord built on clove leaf, whose clove and green elements can remind one of sweet pickles (without the vinegar). There may even be a touch of dill oil. Clove is at work in the heart for certain, along with a touch of rosewood/howood/linalool, and possibly even a bit of coriander, pushing the pickle metaphor further. The lovely Australian sandalwood base has some labdanum and possibly even a bit of balsam (tolu?) as well. The base shares similarities with the heavier, denser Slumberhouse Grev. I'm quite certain I could make a reasonable facsimile of this fragrance, though it would take a bit of time to get all the balances correct given the maceration rate of naturals. (I find I need to wait two weeks to judge a given blend.) All in all, I prefer a bit more complexity. I was working on a clove leaf composition that had some promise a while back, which also featured howood (a natural combination), but had more going on in the base with some frankincense.

Histoires de Parfum Petroleum: Definitely get the band aid thing here (phenols?) and oud, along with some nylon outgas (adoxal?). There seems to be a little sweet amber in the background, but this one is way too chemically for my taste.

The Different Company de Bachmakov: Big raw dough accord up front, possibly something along the lines of copaiba balsam, cilantro and kari (curry) leaf. Pew, never liked the smell of dough. Ah I read now that it's shiso leaf, that makes sense. It's certainly not sweet!

Marc de la Morandiere Genghis Khan: While those previous three are decidedly contemporary and the last two are avant-garde to my nose, this one is a baroque construction that is definitely of its late-80s time frame. Rather than pointing to the future as Cool Water did, GK takes the 80s density idea to an extreme, as Furyo and Ungaro I did around the same time, but choosing a path roughly between those two (animalic sweet incense and animalic green patchouli, respectively). It has gads of castoreum and some musk, as well as funky bitter patchouli and a lot of other stuff going on. It's not as dry and well-structured as Ungaro I due to the prominent amber, but I like it! Surprisingly, the scent becomes quiet rather quickly after the opening hour, but I will assume the longevity is quite good as a skin scent. Thanks Brian, I had assumed I'd like this bomb and I do. Now I just need to find a bottle . . .
post #33 of 78
De Bachmakov by Different Company - Initially, one is treated to a cool freshness. Bergamot, with its herbaceous bitterness, coriander leaves, with their enveloping greenness tinged with a slightly medicinal and rank undertone, and shiso leaves, with their green apple mintiness, similar to a fresh, cumin-like crispness, all commingle to formulate a somewhat bracing accord. A faint juniper and angelica vibe, with a tinge of terpenic linalool, adds a boozy illusion. This exhilarating opening transitions to the floral heart. Freesia, with its airy sweetness and strawberry-like fruitness, along with jasmine, with its tutti-frutti air, cloak the pronounced greenness of the opening. Magical aldehydes adds a brillance to the florals, and fosters a clean and green undertone to their sweetish sensation. Segueing to the awaiting base, a robust Virginia cedar, with its cedar chest aspect, interplays with a comforting nutmeg, with its cinnamon-like air. An pleasing backdrop of craie douce, with its musk-like softness together with woody and mineral nuances, enhances the warm blend. A comforting drydown ensues. Despite the somewhat innovative and original aspects of this composition, its projection, apart from the opening, and longevity, perhaps 4 hours, are severely lacking, and force my hand with a "Neutral" rating.
post #34 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bartlett View Post

Fascinating journey - thanks for sharing - I don’t think anything in my own range is going to prove animalic enough for you, though Artemis is fairly challenging and certainly very green and bitter.

Good to have your input Chris. I was already aware of and quite curious about your Artemis, since wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) is possibly my favorite note ever. Do let me know if there is an easy way for me to procure a small sample.

Quote:
Don’t make the mistake of assuming anything listing a leather note will have birch tar in it: there are lots of good alternatives that are more commonly used (safraleine and castoreum come to mind in particular) that you might enjoy.

Castoreum is very interesting to me, and of course I've never smelled safraleine alone. In general leather-dominant fragrances have not worked well for me, but it's absolutely true that there are exceptions. Almost all the classic masculines with a prominent leather note, or even a subtle one (Cartier Santos, e.g.) just don't work at all for me, so I've become rather paranoid. The thing that was really frustrating was smelling so many excellent herbal openings or compositions that I really liked, which featured some leather note (probably birch tar, though techinically I've never smelled the stuff alone; it's all been a process of elimination) that ruined the ride. Ah well. But thanks for pointing it out.

Quote:
So many fragrances, so little time . . .

Indeed. It's quite overwhelming at times. It makes me very thankful that I'm so incredibly snobby and picky.
post #35 of 78
I can see (from memory!) the raw dough idea in De Bachmakov. I'm around dough a lot, and yeast produces alcohol as a by product of fermentation. This alcohol, being from wheat, does resemble the vodka accord in de bachmakov. They have a very slightly similar pasty aroma as well. I don't think it's close enough that I'd smell that instead of the cold green floral vodka of the scent, though. God I need a bottle of this!
post #36 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityFan21 View Post

I though Vetiver Extraordinaire might be the perfect fragrance to fit this description, but I see that it unfortunately didn't work for you. Very impressive search though, good luck finding what you're after.

I don't find V.E. particularly animalic, and not very green either -- rather, it's smoky and earthy to me. But one thing's for sure, it's parchingly dry and bitter! It's definitely extraordinary and unique. I respect it a lot.
post #37 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovingthealien View Post

I can see (from memory!) the raw dough idea in De Bachmakov. I'm around dough a lot, and yeast produces alcohol as a by product of fermentation. This alcohol, being from wheat, does resemble the vodka accord in de bachmakov. They have a very slightly similar pasty aroma as well.

Vodka, yes that makes sense. Pasty is a very good word for it.
post #38 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Good to have your input Chris. I was already aware of and quite curious about your Artemis, since wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) is possibly my favorite note ever. Do let me know if there is an easy way for me to procure a small sample.



Castoreum is very interesting to me, and of course I've never smelled safraleine alone. In general leather-dominant fragrances have not worked well for me, but it's absolutely true that there are exceptions. Almost all the classic masculines with a prominent leather note, or even a subtle one (Cartier Santos, e.g.) just don't work at all for me, so I've become rather paranoid. The thing that was really frustrating was smelling so many excellent herbal openings or compositions that I really liked, which featured some leather note (probably birch tar, though techinically I've never smelled the stuff alone; it's all been a process of elimination) that ruined the ride. Ah well. But thanks for pointing it out.



Indeed. It's quite overwhelming at times. It makes me very thankful that I'm so incredibly snobby and picky.

Just a shot, but have you tried Dali Pour Homme? It's about as bitter and green as they come and chock-full of castoreum. Pretty incredible fragrance, though it's definitely a tad 80s powerhouse.
post #39 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by forfreddie View Post

Interesting reviews Monkeybars!
Thanks for posting your thoughts

Thanks for reading. More reviews in the original thread -- link in OP above.
post #40 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Chambers View Post

I think I've come to the same conclusion on Petroleum. I wanted to like it, but I don't think I can wear it. And I will wear pretty much anything.

It's cool to know frags like that are out there and people like them. Perhaps you and I simply ain't that hardcore my friend.

Quote:
Very happy to know that clove can smell tangy like JAR Shadow. That solves a big mystery. (Although I'm a little embarrassed that you thought the pickle accord was reported by me; I was responding to other reviews and don't actually find it to be pickly--just tangy as if from mustard seed.) I also find it very hard to dismantle JAR Shadow because it's polished like a gemstone: there are simply no edges to grab onto and say, "it's this!", though you've done a much better job than I. The point where we diverge is that I don't find it simple at all. On the surface, it is certainly uniform, sort of like the way Anthony Hopkins in The Remains of the Day speaks very few words and never fails to be utterly composed. But I find its juxtapositions original and full of tension. For its short lifespan, it holds my interest intently. That it's so inscrutable only makes me want it more.

I use the word "simple" to mean that there are a minimum of accords. However, the subtlety in dosage and detail/supportive notes should not be underestimated -- that's why I also described it as "elegant." I find the best fragrances have both going -- an overall concept/structure, as well as accords that can be picked out of that whole. Yatagan and Jicky come to mind in that regard.

Quote:
Glad you like Gengis Khan. I'm having trouble making friends with it. I layered it with Trefle Pur the other day, and that was actually nice. Sometimes you just need someone else to make the introduction.

B, I would never have thought of that. Perhaps I'll try it. It seems a bit like mixing white and red wine or something, heavy and light . . . does it come out rosé?
post #41 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovingthealien View Post

Just a shot, but have you tried Dali Pour Homme? It's about as bitter and green as they come and chock-full of castoreum. Pretty incredible fragrance, though it's definitely a tad 80s powerhouse.

Dali is already in the "pass" list above. actually it's more bittersweet to me rather than straight up dry/bitter. the rich florals take it a bit out of this Journey. though the heavy animalics are very unique. i'm pretty sure the leather in it was birch tar anyways. thanks for dropping in.
post #42 of 78
It would have been a lot cheaper to buy some galbanum, artemisia, civet/catoreum, or whatever, and tried to make it yourself, don't you think? What I've tried to do is to learn the notes while also trying to figure out what I enjoy in a frag. I went through a period when I thought I was looking for a frag that had very specific characteristics. You say to yourself, if only frag X had a little more amber to soften it up, then you buy a frag that you think has that quality and something about it disappoints you. Somewhere along the line, I began to appreciate the construction of many frags even though I wasn't a huge fan of certain strong notes in that frag, and I'm really glad that's how things worked out, because now I enjoy a much wider range of frags than at any time in the past. If a frag meets certain criteria, I almost always enjoy it enough to wear it once in a while, at least. But as I said, if I thought I wanted a very specific kind of frag now, I would try to make it myself (actually, I'm acting as an adviser to a new niche company now so I'd have that perfumer make it for me, and I'm sure it could be done for you at a reasonable price, though again, I'm not sure you would like it LOL).
post #43 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

B, I would never have thought of that. Perhaps I'll try it. It seems a bit like mixing white and red wine or something, heavy and light . . . does it come out rosé?

I won't even pour wine into a glass that is the wrong shape let alone with a different wine altogether. But I guess I am a barbarian when it comes to layering scents.

Truth be told, I've never done anything like this combination. I've only really been comfortable with frags that occupy completely different areas of the olfactory stage. For example, I can put Bolt of Lightning (think stronger Carnal Flower) over Vetiver 46, and both scents remain completely intact. It's more of a cohabitation than a mixing. Trefle Pur and Gengis Khan actually mix, and there's an excellent chance you will find it revolting/offensive/sacrilege.
post #44 of 78
Versace L'Homme

I don't see it in either list of fragrances you have tried.
I wouldn't classify it as animalic, but it is a dark, green, leathery chypre
to my nose, and something you might like.

Apparently, there have been 2 reformulations. I have a bottle of the
1st reformulation, and it is excellent. I have heard that the current formulation
is not terrible, but I can't speak from experience. I think it would be well worth
a try.

EDIT:

Just thought of another one: 1828/Jules Verne by Histoires de Parfums

It's bitter and green to my nose, but not animalic. I get pine and eucalyptus.
Very astringent/bitter. Might be something else you'd like.
post #45 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surfacing View Post

Great work MonkeyBars. That particular thread is a classic. More guys should put in that kind of effort, instead of the "recommend me a scent, any scent, as long as its Creed or Tom Ford" garbage..... ( of course, there are lots of people who really are not interested in fragrances, so they can go about it as they want I suppose).

That is one of the best threads on BN in a long time.
post #46 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Thanks laph, I'll give Tenere a shot.

The leather in Bandit bothered me. I could swear it has birch tar, but maybe its those phenols or another "leather" ingeredient. I didn't find it all that green. That may very well be because leather ingredients often overwhelm compositions to my nose; it's almost all I can smell.

Actually I find Wonderwood green, ...

.... in the lines of ... "a black jaguar sliding through poisonous plants in the deep dark jungle." In general it should not be a "friendly green fresh fields and flowers" scent. More on the alarming side, or "challenging" as I like to put it. You'll notice I listed Yatagan first, and for good reason.

With all this I don't think the term 'green' is well defined. And as You state to be sensitive to 'leather' Yatagan is an obvious choice because the 'leather' in it is quite timid, to say the least. At last 'bitter' is a taste (sweet bitter salt sour fatty), less of a smell. This brief compilation might explain, why the range You already tried and the number of suggestions are relentlessly growing.

A panther in the jungle, aggressive, terrifying, at least alarming! I personally won't expect a 'green' smell from the jungle. It looks green but smells earthy, rotting with sweet, fleshy underpinnings, in short no good.

As an approximation to what I think You are thinking of, work out, don't wash, apply Calyx sparingly and say: buuh! An alternative less challenging to Your entourage could possibly be Eloge Du Traitre. It can be 'read' as 'bubble bath', though, making the wearer a 'toothless tiger'. NO RISK NO FUN
post #47 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Good to have your input Chris. I was already aware of and quite curious about your Artemis, since wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) is possibly my favorite note ever. Do let me know if there is an easy way for me to procure a small sample.

Thanks - I can send one of my sample packs to you - if you drop me an email Ill fix it up with you - as long as I dont end up out of pocket Im always happy to send samples anywhere in the world. The website is set up for UK only because the postage system isnt quite sophisticated enough and also because getting product liability insurance that covers North America is prohibitively expensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Castoreum is very interesting to me, and of course I've never smelled safraleine alone. In general leather-dominant fragrances have not worked well for me, but it's absolutely true that there are exceptions. Almost all the classic masculines with a prominent leather note, or even a subtle one (Cartier Santos, e.g.) just don't work at all for me, so I've become rather paranoid. The thing that was really frustrating was smelling so many excellent herbal openings or compositions that I really liked, which featured some leather note (probably birch tar, though techinically I've never smelled the stuff alone; it's all been a process of elimination) that ruined the ride. Ah well. But thanks for pointing it out.

One of the things I could put in that sample pack if you like is a dilution of pure safraleine so that you can smell it alone . . .

The good thing about being such a small business is that there are no rules unless I make them for myself - so if you want something unusual - ask.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Indeed. It's quite overwhelming at times. It makes me very thankful that I'm so incredibly snobby and picky.

Best way to be though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

It would have been a lot cheaper to buy some galbanum, artemisia, civet/catoreum, or whatever, and tried to make it yourself, don't you think? What I've tried to do is to learn the notes while also trying to figure out what I enjoy in a frag. I went through a period when I thought I was looking for a frag that had very specific characteristics. You say to yourself, if only frag X had a little more amber to soften it up, then you buy a frag that you think has that quality and something about it disappoints you. Somewhere along the line, I began to appreciate the construction of many frags even though I wasn't a huge fan of certain strong notes in that frag, and I'm really glad that's how things worked out, because now I enjoy a much wider range of frags than at any time in the past. If a frag meets certain criteria, I almost always enjoy it enough to wear it once in a while, at least. But as I said, if I thought I wanted a very specific kind of frag now, I would try to make it myself (actually, I'm acting as an adviser to a new niche company now so I'd have that perfumer make it for me, and I'm sure it could be done for you at a reasonable price, though again, I'm not sure you would like it LOL).

I dont think it would have been cheaper - having gone that route myself it has taken a huge amount of learning to be able to put together a saleable fragrance.

However having a perfumer make something for you is certainly an option - thats how I make most of my living - designing things to a commission. Its great fun to work with someone to collaboratively produce a new scent. As you say though, there is the risk that at the end of the process it turns out it wasnt the destination that was important but the journey . . .
post #48 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bartlett View Post

I don’t think it would have been cheaper...

Do you mean if the person didn't know notes/essential oils at all, or do you mean that even if you had a perfumer's knowledge the cost of ingredients would be high, since you would use up a lot tinkering around until you got it just the way you wanted it?
post #49 of 78
Another vote for Versace l'Homme
post #50 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

Do you mean if the person didn't know notes/essential oils at all, or do you mean that even if you had a perfumer's knowledge the cost of ingredients would be high, since you would use up a lot tinkering around until you got it just the way you wanted it?

Well it is scary how much stuff you can waste before you get a successful blend, especially with someone incredibly snobby and picky but no, I still dont think that would amount to the cost of all those fragrances.

What I really meant was that knowing notes and essential oils really isnt enough. For one thing modern fragrances, despite being described in terms of essential oils, are mainly composed of synthetics: there are thousands of them to get to grips with and many smell very different depending on the dilution.

Even that isnt the real killer though, its knowing how things will work when you combine them - sometime you can put two things together and get something that was not detectable in either (a well known example of this is the Fougere effect where you combine oakmoss and lavender and get something that does not really smell like either) the same thing happens with lots of things and you can see that as you add more ingredients the possibilities increase exponentially.

Then there is the fact that some ingredients actually undergo chemical reactions when you put them together so they dont just smell different, but they react together to make different compounds right there in the fragrance and so the smell changes again as that reaction continues, which may go on for weeks. The colour will often change as a result too.

Then there is the fixative business - each fixative has different effects on the different volatile notes - this affects the development of the perfume over time depending on the particular combination used. So although Glucam P-20 is good for extending the life of sweet orange, for example, it does not do the same with lavender.

There are a lot of things like this that when you first start out you dont even know what the question is, much less the answer - unknown unknowns as someone once said. When I started learning all this a few years ago I already had a lifetime of playing with essential oils behind me and it has still been a full time job to learn it all. Thats one expensive perfume!
post #51 of 78
Patrick (Fragrances of Ireland)

A crisp fougere - green, musky, and bitter enough if you work at it.

Edit: Just noticed it's on your no list.
post #52 of 78
Here's another one to add to your list...

Testa Maura - Carticasi
Topnote: Mastic Resin
Heartnote: Galbanum, Rose, Ylang-Ylang
Basenote: Cedarwood
post #53 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bartlett View Post

For one thing modern fragrances, despite being described in terms of essential oils, are mainly composed of synthetics: there are thousands of them to get to grips with and many smell very different depending on the dilution.

Even that isnt the real killer though, its knowing how things will work when you combine them - sometime you can put two things together and get something that was not detectable in either (a well known example of this is the Fougere effect where you combine oakmoss and lavender and get something that does not really smell like either) ...

... and finally this concoction is made to combine with an unknown humans skin (living - smelling) in a positive way. In recent years there was a trend to name perfumes after some 'natural' constituents, e/g Lipstick Rose, Geranium Poor Messy, Oud Benighted. Most probably in order to indicate worthiness by evocation of natural aromas. Alas, along with that, eager perfumistas forgot about the central role of the perfumery effect, the synergy and mystery. To analyze fragrances into single notes doesn't help the understanding. And, as You confirmed, this 'noting out' could to some degree be considered mindless when it comes to synthetics.

Safraleine for instance smells of itself, and to my nose can't hide as a 'leather' - it's always safraleine.
post #54 of 78
Wel de Weil fits. bitter, green, and animalic. It's a feminine, the muguet might be offputting, but it has galbanum and civet. pm me if you'd like a little sample.
post #55 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

It would have been a lot cheaper to buy some galbanum, artemisia, civet/catoreum, or whatever, and tried to make it yourself, don't you think?

I found it terribly time-consuming. Much more time consuming than researching a fragrance and trying it out. The wait of 2-3 weeks just to know what the most recent formula smells like, before coming up with a variation to get it just right, etc. Chris is absolutely right in his description of the complexities involved. I wanted to get a good feel for what's out there before I went ahead and picked up some beeswax and honey absolutes and jumped back in. It's been about 4 years since I was really working on some of my own complex blends (15-20 naturals were usually involved).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Chambers View Post

I won't even pour wine into a glass that is the wrong shape let alone with a different wine altogether. But I guess I am a barbarian when it comes to layering scents.

Truth be told, I've never done anything like this combination. I've only really been comfortable with frags that occupy completely different areas of the olfactory stage. For example, I can put Bolt of Lightning (think stronger Carnal Flower) over Vetiver 46, and both scents remain completely intact. It's more of a cohabitation than a mixing. Trefle Pur and Gengis Khan actually mix, and there's an excellent chance you will find it revolting/offensive/sacrilege.

I've done a little layering, usually with scents that are more minimal or transparent, or are a more "theme" type of fragrance, such as a clean vetiver with a light eau de cologne to darken and affix, e.g.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpp214 View Post

Versace L'Homme

I don't see it in either list of fragrances you have tried.
I wouldn't classify it as animalic, but it is a dark, green, leathery chypre
to my nose, and something you might like.

Apparently, there have been 2 reformulations. I have a bottle of the
1st reformulation, and it is excellent. I have heard that the current formulation
is not terrible, but I can't speak from experience. I think it would be well worth
a try.

EDIT:

Just thought of another one: 1828/Jules Verne by Histoires de Parfums

It's bitter and green to my nose, but not animalic. I get pine and eucalyptus.
Very astringent/bitter. Might be something else you'd like.

Considering L'Homme's mid-80s release date, I assume birch tar.

1828 sounds pretty incensey which I usually don't dig but maybe I will give it a try as I enjoy Gucci Envy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildThingy View Post

With all this I don't think the term 'green' is well defined. And as You state to be sensitive to 'leather' Yatagan is an obvious choice because the 'leather' in it is quite timid, to say the least. At last 'bitter' is a taste (sweet bitter salt sour fatty), less of a smell. This brief compilation might explain, why the range You already tried and the number of suggestions are relentlessly growing.

A panther in the jungle, aggressive, terrifying, at least alarming! I personally won't expect a 'green' smell from the jungle. It looks green but smells earthy, rotting with sweet, fleshy underpinnings, in short no good.

As an approximation to what I think You are thinking of, work out, don't wash, apply Calyx sparingly and say: buuh! An alternative less challenging to Your entourage could possibly be Eloge Du Traitre. It can be 'read' as 'bubble bath', though, making the wearer a 'toothless tiger'. NO RISK NO FUN

I recounted in detail in my old thread (link in OP) rather exactly what I meant by "green," and Eloge du Traitre had a lot of birch tar to my nose; it's in the "no" list above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pluran View Post

Patrick (Fragrances of Ireland)

A crisp fougere - green, musky, and bitter enough if you work at it.

Edit: Just noticed it's on your no list.

Birch tar in an otherwise nice frag.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfarom View Post

Here's another one to add to your list...

Testa Maura - Carticasi
Topnote: Mastic Resin
Heartnote: Galbanum, Rose, Ylang-Ylang
Basenote: Cedarwood

Thanks alfa, I saw that in your post from last month. How much rose and ylang is there in that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jujy54 View Post

Wel de Weil fits. bitter, green, and animalic. It's a feminine, the muguet might be offputting, but it has galbanum and civet. pm me if you'd like a little sample.

Even the driest, most bitter feminines I have tried (Aromatics Elixir, Chanel No 19, Anarchy etc) come nowhere near as bitter as I like, so it probably has a good deal too much floral character for me. Thanks for dropping in.
post #56 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Thanks alfa, I saw that in your post from last month. How much rose and ylang is there in that?

To me it's mainly galbanum, mastic and cedarwood. Rose it's there, absolutely, but has an acidic/transparent presence as opposed to the powdery sweet rose I thoroughly detest. Smells more like rosy-geranium...I've rapidly tested it on a girlfriend of mine and I would definitely need a full wear to get a more precise idea but it immediately made me think about you...
post #57 of 78
I didn't know you tried your hand at perfumery. Usually, it seems, people who do that fiddle around with a lot of frags first or just focus on their own creations. However, I'm surprised you've been seeking strong dryness and bitterness in designer frags. Have you sampled that Kerosene frag that has an orange bitters note in it (IIRC)?
post #58 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfarom View Post

To me it's mainly galbanum, mastic and cedarwood. Rose it's there, absolutely, but has an acidic/transparent presence as opposed to the powdery sweet rose I thoroughly detest. Smells more like rosy-geranium...I've rapidly tested it on a girlfriend of mine and I would definitely need a full wear to get a more precise idea but it immediately made me think about you...

I like a nice tart, subtle rose. I will give it a shot! Any idea where I can get a sample?
post #59 of 78
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

I didn't know you tried your hand at perfumery. Usually, it seems, people who do that fiddle around with a lot of frags first or just focus on their own creations. However, I'm surprised you've been seeking strong dryness and bitterness in designer frags. Have you sampled that Kerosene frag that has an orange bitters note in it (IIRC)?

I love bitters. My drink of choice is bitters and soda. But I'm not familiar with that one. I've checked out some of his reviews and I think he and I have very, very different taste, so I haven't been in a hurry to try his creations.
post #60 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyBars View Post

Any idea where I can get a sample?

I got my sample from a shop in Florence. Why don't you try to contact them via their webside www.testamaura.com
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: MFD Archive
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › The Journey: Green, Bitter and Animalic