Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › Marine/oceanic vs Aquatic??
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Marine/oceanic vs Aquatic??

post #1 of 44
Thread Starter 
I regularly see a distinction between marine (or oceanic) and aquatic fragrances on this board. Usually, the marine fragrance is referenced in a positive way, while aquatics are generally disliked. Is it just that aquatics has such a bad rep that reviewers tend to call aquatics they like marines? Or is there an olfactory distinction between the two - if so, what is the difference?
post #2 of 44
For me, aquatics equal "calone overload," and I hate calone (not that it's unpleasant but rather that it's a weird distraction). Marine smells more salty, animalic, and almost resinous to me. Yesterday I wore Burberry Sport Ice for Men and was very relieved that the "water" note was of the marine kind. It "married" with wood, orange, and ginger, and was quite pleasant, though lacking depth (not that I expected it to have much if any depth).
post #3 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

For me, aquatics equal "calone overload," and I hate calone (not that it's unpleasant but rather that it's a weird distraction). Marine smells more salty, animalic, and almost resinous to me. Yesterday I wore Burberry Sport Ice for Men and was very relieved that the "water" note was of the marine kind. It "married" with wood, orange, and ginger, and was quite pleasant, though lacking depth (not that I expected it to have much if any depth).

So do you mean that they belong to the same class of fragrances, but differ with regards to how much calone they use? Wouldn't that mean that marine is a particular type of aquatic - one that makes less use of calone and using more salty and animalic notes?

Also, which fragrances would you consider quintessential aquatics vs marine?
post #4 of 44
Something can be loaded with marine notes and not have a touch of calone. There's the various "salt" aromas, seaweed, driftwood, ocean air, and of course, oakmoss. All quintessential "marine" scents without that melony aquatic aroma.
post #5 of 44
I'm not a big fan of these frags and rarely wear them, so I can only speak in general terms. Calone creates an odd kind of "vibration" for me (at least when used in certain amounts), which I find irritating. I don't feel that it adds anything positive. If you can't tell the difference, why should you care? Just wear what you enjoy and perhaps some day you will detect it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWJ View Post

So do you mean that they belong to the same class of fragrances, but differ with regards to how much calone they use? Wouldn't that mean that marine is a particular type of aquatic - one that makes less use of calone and using more salty and animalic notes?

Also, which fragrances would you consider quintessential aquatics vs marine?
post #6 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovingthealien View Post

Something can be loaded with marine notes and not have a touch of calone. There's the various "salt" aromas, seaweed, driftwood, ocean air, and of course, oakmoss. All quintessential "marine" scents without that melony aquatic aroma.

Ok, what are some fragrances with marine notes without calone?

I guess I understand the concept but not the classification. Do you consider marine a type of aquatic (one without calone)? If not, is marine a class in itself, along side aquatics, cyphres, fougeres, orientals, etc.?
post #7 of 44
Here's a couple I would put in each category. Yes, very different scents when you compare marine to aquatic.

Marine:
Aqua (not marine, yes ironic)
Sel Marin

Aquatic:
ADG
Chrome
post #8 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

I'm not a big fan of these frags and rarely wear them, so I can only speak in general terms. Calone creates an odd kind of "vibration" for me (at least when used in certain amounts), which I find irritating. I don't feel that it adds anything positive. If you can't tell the difference, why should you care? Just wear what you enjoy and perhaps some day you will detect it.

Why are you presuming that I want you to justify what fragrances to wear? It's not a matter of not being able to tell the difference, it's a matter of understanding the difference. Can you tell floral scents from flower scents? Probably not. It's not because you can't detect the difference, it's because you don't know the difference - I would have to define it for you.
post #9 of 44
I don't really understand the discussion at this point so I'm bowing out, gracefully. I'll just say that to me, detection and understanding are bound to each other in an inseparable way.
post #10 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrisp View Post

Here's a couple I would put in each category. Yes, very different scents when you compare marine to aquatic.

Marine:
Aqua (not marine, yes ironic)
Sel Marin

Aquatic:
ADG
Chrome

I have to try Sel Marin! As for Aqva, isn't there calone in there?
post #11 of 44
They are one and the same for me.
post #12 of 44
I think the term 'aquatics' tends to be used to describe those type of fragrances all the rage in the 90's which were chock full of calone where as 'marine' tends to be used to describe fragrances which evoke the beach, water or the sea but a bit more tastefully. If you have ever smelt a tincture of ambergris this has a strong marine element but nothing in common with the watery melon of calone.

Lastly there is nothing wrong with calone it is a very useful material but is cloying when overdosed.
post #13 of 44
I would boil it down to aquatic = fresh synthetic, while marine = salty or seaweed-y.
post #14 of 44
For me it's a matter how 'salty' the scent is.

For example, for example to me, Kenzo Homme and Nautica Voyage have a hint of salt in it and are less fruity than others (like Bvlgari, Mexx Men, ADG etc.)

Aquatics are generally seen as less interesting but fresher and cleaner.
'Marine' to me is more interesting and really gets that beach feel (salty sea).
post #15 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsly View Post

I don't really understand the discussion at this point so I'm bowing out, gracefully. I'll just say that to me, detection and understanding are bound to each other in an inseparable way.

You're right, detection and understanding go together. So it wouldn't really suffice for me to tell you that "flower fragrances" are "more sweet, clean and ethereal" than floral fragrances. I would have to give you a number of examples so that you could detect the difference I'm referencing.

The reason I'm asking the question is that the distinction between aquatics and marines is unclear to me. This is probably due to the fact that "marine" is not a conventional category - these scents are officially classified as aquatics - but one that pops up every now and then in reviews.

So, based on the answers, marines are salty and organic and aquatics are fruity and fresh. I guess I need more examples, because many aquatics tend to be all of this. Take for example, Creed Millesime Imperial - to me it's salty and fruity. Is it an aquatic or a marine? Same with Bvlgari Aqva. What about Creed Erolfa - it's very briny and "oceanic" but still has those calone/fruity notes?

- - - Updated - - -

Heck, there are even salty notes in Acqua di Gio!
post #16 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by LloydLlewellyn View Post

I would boil it down to aquatic = fresh synthetic, while marine = salty or seaweed-y.

This is it, but "Fresh" actually means (and has since the 90s) nostril-singing metallic shower attack.
post #17 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovingthealien View Post

This is it, but "Fresh" actually means (and has since the 90s) nostril-singing metallic shower attack.

LOL, precisely!
post #18 of 44
Thread Starter 
Ok, time for a poll! For each, do you consider it marine or aquatic?

Creed MI
Creed Erolfa
Bvlgari Aqva
Bvlgari Aqva Marine
Heeley Sel Marin
Acqua di Gio
L'eau d'Issey
Cool Water
Bond Wall Street
Polo Blue
Kenzo PH
Nautica Voyage
post #19 of 44
Creed MI - neither
Creed Erolfa - marine
Bvlgari Aqva - walks the line
Bvlgari Aqva Marine - also walks the line
Heeley Sel Marin - marine
Acqua di Gio - aquatic
L'eau d'Issey - more floral to me
Cool Water - aquatic
Bond Wall Street - only slightly aquatic
Polo Blue - aquatic
Kenzo PH - dunno
Nautica Voyage - aquatic



Ok, I'd like to say in order for it to be a marine/oceanic scent in my mind it has to remind me of a marine/ocean. Aquatic would just give me a watery feeling. That said, I can't think of anything that I consider just an aquatic fragrance that I enjoy, and I feel like marine/ocean might just be an offset of the aquatic category, and in my mind is much more interesting.
post #20 of 44
Creed MI - Aquatic, but also fruity
Creed Erolfa - Marine
Bvlgari Aqva - Marine
Bvlgari Aqva Marine - Terrible
Heeley Sel Marin - Marin
Acqua di Gio - Aquatic
L'eau d'Issey - Watery floral
Cool Water - Aquatic
Bond Wall Street - ?
Polo Blue - Aquatic
Kenzo PH - ?
Nautica Voyage - Aquatic
post #21 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWJ View Post

I regularly see a distinction between marine (or oceanic) and aquatic fragrances on this board. Usually, the marine fragrance is referenced in a positive way, while aquatics are generally disliked. Is it just that aquatics has such a bad rep that reviewers tend to call aquatics they like marines? Or is there an olfactory distinction between the two - if so, what is the difference?

You raise an interesting question.

I've never seen any classification system differentiate between marine and aquatic scents.
Which is weird to me, as they are plainly different, and the manufacturers often distinguish between them by sticking something "Marine"-like in the name. Or in their descriptions/ads mention that some are marine scents or contain marine notes.

To my mind, aquatic/watery scents include the following scents, which don't contain any hint of the ocean or of something oceanic -
Aqua di Gio, Halston Unbound, Paris Hilton Just Me, Jill Sander Pure Man, Bvlgari Aqua, L'Eau Par Kenzo, Aqua di Roma, the various Eternity Summer editions.

The marine/oceanic scents which smell something like part of the ocean include,
Erolfa, Nautica original, Nautica Voyage, Insense UltraMarine, Del Mar, Nautilus Aqua, Agua Brava Sea Power, Bvlgari Aqua Marine, Aqua Motu and lastly Kenzo Homme (with the glorious smell of seaweed).

Then there are scents with fairly prominent marine notes, but where there is too much else going on to label them marine scents - Laguna, Escape and Michael Jordan come to mind. Technically, most of the Creed scents, with their healthy doses of ambergris (whale ejecta), could be thrown into this group too.

Finally, there is the weird one - Aramis New West, the first scent full of calone, which I really really like, but which doesn't seem much like either an aquatic or a marine scent to me.

When people attack aquatics around here, it transpires they are usually attacking what I think of as aquatics, and sometimes what I think of as marine scents, and sometimes what they think are aquatic scents but are actually fougeres - eg. Cool Water (mainly because it has "Water" in the name) and Horizon. And they are attacking them because they don't meet their high standards of artisan workmanship, or are too synthetic, or are supposed clones.

The only aquatics I'm not too fond of are Aqua di Gio and Bvlgari Aqua because they don't have much impact on my nose. But I like most of the other aqautic and marine scents. I only attack scents that don't last long enough, and hence don't do their jobs.
Cheers,
Renato
post #22 of 44
To me, one is a subset of the other:

Aquatic - reminiscent of a body of water (any kind of body of water)
Marine - reminiscent of the sea

So a Marine scent is a type of Aquatic scent.

Calone is an odd one. Its supposed to mimic a scent produced by Algae blooms on the sea, which definitely sounds Marine to me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calone

However, its also called "Watermelon ketone", and it seems which one of these 2 scents you perceive (the salty, seaweedy "Sea Breeze" smell, or the Fruity smell) depends on its concentration.

Kenzo have 2 good examples. Kenzo Homme is an Aquatic that is also a Marine, whereas L'Eau Par Kenzo PH is an Aquatic that is not a Marine. I only seem to like the latter type.
post #23 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andym72 View Post

To me, one is a subset of the other:

Aquatic - reminiscent of a body of water (any kind of body of water)
Marine - reminiscent of the sea

So a Marine scent is a type of Aquatic scent.

Calone is an odd one. Its supposed to mimic a scent produced by Algae blooms on the sea, which definitely sounds Marine to me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calone

However, its also called "Watermelon ketone", and it seems which one of these 2 scents you perceive (the salty, seaweedy "Sea Breeze" smell, or the Fruity smell) depends on its concentration.

Kenzo have 2 good examples. Kenzo Homme is an Aquatic that is also a Marine, whereas L'Eau Par Kenzo PH is an Aquatic that is not a Marine. I only seem to like the latter type.

This makes sense to me. So if the water effect is briny and dense enough (evoking the ocean), the aquatic is an "aquatic marine", or even "fresh aquatic marine" going by the fragrance wheel, else it would be.. "fresh aquatic fruity" maybe? This could also explain why this category isn't officially used and why there might be some split opinions whether certain fragrances are marine or not - because it's a sub sub category.
post #24 of 44
Creed MI - chypre
Creed Erolfa - chypre
Bvlgari Aqva - aquatic
Bvlgari Aqva Marine - aquatic
Heeley Sel Marin - Marine
Acqua di Gio - chemical aquatic
L'eau d'Issey - woody citrus
Cool Water - aromatic aquatic
Bond Wall Street - aquatic
Polo Blue - aquatic
Kenzo PH - woody floral
Nautica Voyage - aquatic


Marine fragrances don't need to be aquatic, a Marine fragrance can smell of things associated with the sea without being in the least bit watery or moist. Aquatic fragrances are almost by definition watery and moist. To me the best contrast is between Elixir des Merveilles which is a Marine fragrance which isn't in the least bit watery and something like L'Eau Par Kenzo which is just an aquatic through and through. In L'Eau Par Kenzo's case there's not even a hint of the sea, this is just water and some citrus and a little sweetness.
post #25 of 44
post #26 of 44
Thread Starter 
Is aquatics really such a sensitive issue? I really doubt, had I asked a question about definition and taxonomy regarding orientals, that I would be told to stop worrying (twice now). I'm on this board because I like to discuss these stupid things

Special thanks to Renato and Hilaire for good posts! I need to try Elixir des Merveilles - a non-watery marine, that's intriguing.
post #27 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWJ View Post

...the distinction between aquatics and marines is unclear to me.

This is really true for even the major categories, such as fougere and oriental. Even chypres, which presumably must have the key accord, can be "hybrids," and so the obvious question is whether a hybrid should be included, or should we call it a fougerypre, or something like that? I'm now at the point where I think of the entire construction, and so the terms are of limited value (for frags I like, at least). However, there is clearly an issue concerning how to communicate your understanding to others. On my blog I wrote a long post about the idea of a "baroque fougere," for example.
post #28 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilaire View Post

Creed MI - chypre
Creed Erolfa - chypre
Bvlgari Aqva - aquatic
Bvlgari Aqva Marine - aquatic
Heeley Sel Marin - Marine
Acqua di Gio - chemical aquatic
L'eau d'Issey - woody citrus
Cool Water - aromatic aquatic
Bond Wall Street - aquatic
Polo Blue - aquatic
Kenzo PH - woody floral
Nautica Voyage - aquatic


Marine fragrances don't need to be aquatic, a Marine fragrance can smell of things associated with the sea without being in the least bit watery or moist. Aquatic fragrances are almost by definition watery and moist. To me the best contrast is between Elixir des Merveilles which is a Marine fragrance which isn't in the least bit watery and something like L'Eau Par Kenzo which is just an aquatic through and through. In L'Eau Par Kenzo's case there's not even a hint of the sea, this is just water and some citrus and a little sweetness.

You have an interesting perspective, and raise some interesting points.

But what if one were to distinguish between a body of fresh water and a body of sea water?
Or use fresh water coming down from the sky as the reference for Aquatic?
Or should we use distilled and de-ionised water as the reference? It has no real smell I can detect.

Sea water covers two thirds of the earth's surface, and the amount of fresh water is immaterial by comparison. I really think the term oceanic has more meaning because of this.

Dumping oceanic/marine scents in with watery/ aquatic scents doesn't help discussion, it confuses it.

Some people may really dislike oceanic scents but really like watery scents, and vice versa. Then these discussions about "aquatics" get really confusing, as no one defines what they are really talking about.

Also, you have Kenzo Homme as a woody floral. I just mainly smell the pleasant seaweed note in it from start to finish - which isn't listed in the published notes. Seaweed isn't a floral. When I used to live half an hour from the beach, after a beach day, I'd spray Kenzo Homme on just to continue the beach day experience at home. That makes it a marine scent in my book - one of the best.
Cheers,
Renato
post #29 of 44
I get the distinction that some people are trying to make. But IMO there is so much overlap of notes and accords in this general category, and so much variation in individual perception, that definitive distinctions are hard or impossible to make.

However, to me personally, both "marine" and "aquatic" are red flag terms that indicate I most likely will not like a fragrance. I suppose that for fans of the genre, these fine distinctions might be more meaningful.
post #30 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato View Post

You have an interesting perspective, and raise some interesting points.

But what if one were to distinguish between a body of fresh water and a body of sea water?
Or use fresh water coming down from the sky as the reference for Aquatic?
Or should we use distilled and de-ionised water as the reference? It has no real smell I can detect.

Sea water covers two thirds of the earth's surface, and the amount of fresh water is immaterial by comparison. I really think the term oceanic has more meaning because of this.

Dumping oceanic/marine scents in with watery/ aquatic scents doesn't help discussion, it confuses it.

Some people may really dislike oceanic scents but really like watery scents, and vice versa. Then these discussions about "aquatics" get really confusing, as no one defines what they are really talking about.

Also, you have Kenzo Homme as a woody floral. I just mainly smell the pleasant seaweed note in it from start to finish - which isn't listed in the published notes. Seaweed isn't a floral. When I used to live half an hour from the beach, after a beach day, I'd spray Kenzo Homme on just to continue the beach day experience at home. That makes it a marine scent in my book - one of the best.
Cheers,
Renato



There's a further distinction to be made too, not just between fresh water and salt water scents, but between watery scents in general and Ozonic/Air-like/Petrichor scents. All too often I see fragrances which smell of damp air or of Ozone or of Petrichor listed as Aquatics or being referred to as Aquatic when these odours may have connections with water they are not aquatic in nature and are more Gaseous or Vaporous. I think a further distinction between perfumes which smells of fresh water (true Aquatics), smells of salt water (Oceanics to use your suggestion), smells of things associated with the sea (Marines, including things like seaweed, Ambergris, driftwood etc), and things which are Vaporous and Gaseous would be useful.

I don't really get a seaweed note in Kenzo Homme which I suppose is why I think of it as a woody floral.
post #31 of 44
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilaire View Post

There's a further distinction to be made too, not just between fresh water and salt water scents, but between watery scents in general and Ozonic/Air-like/Petrichor scents. All too often I see fragrances which smell of damp air or of Ozone or of Petrichor listed as Aquatics or being referred to as Aquatic when these odours may have connections with water they are not aquatic in nature and are more Gaseous or Vaporous. I think a further distinction between perfumes which smells of fresh water (true Aquatics), smells of salt water (Oceanics to use your suggestion), smells of things associated with the sea (Marines, including things like seaweed, Ambergris, driftwood etc), and things which are Vaporous and Gaseous would be useful.

I don't really get a seaweed note in Kenzo Homme which I suppose is why I think of it as a woody floral.

How would you sort these categories in the olfactory groups? Would they all be aromatics? Aromatic - fougere, Aromatic - aquatic, Aromatic - oceanic, Aromatic - marine, etc?
post #32 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWJ View Post

How would you sort these categories in the olfactory groups? Would they all be aromatics? Aromatic - fougere, Aromatic - aquatic, Aromatic - oceanic, Aromatic - marine, etc?


I think that depends on the compositions these elements are used in. The main olfactory groups aren't really formed of things which smell akin, they're formed out of specific compositional types. So if a perfume was primarily composed in a Fougere manner and contained a strong Ozonic note (lets say) it would be a Gaseous Fougere. If an Oriental contained a strong Ambergris component it would be a Marine Oriental.

There are compositions which do attempt to be Marine, Aquatic, Oceanic, Gaseous, Vaporous etc, however they are still currently broadly grouped under the Aquatic banner primarily out of laziness. The whole Aquatic group is in my opinion a fiction. If you look at almost all so called Aquatic fragrances they can almost always be more accurately put into other groups, a significant proportion of them are either Chypres or Fougeres depending on their principle ingredients.

So what one would end up with would be with eliminating the whole "Aquatic" group and replacing it with Gaseous Aromatics, Vaporous Chypres, Marine Fougeres etc etc.
post #33 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilaire View Post

There's a further distinction to be made too, not just between fresh water and salt water scents, but between watery scents in general and Ozonic/Air-like/Petrichor scents. All too often I see fragrances which smell of damp air or of Ozone or of Petrichor listed as Aquatics or being referred to as Aquatic when these odours may have connections with water they are not aquatic in nature and are more Gaseous or Vaporous. I think a further distinction between perfumes which smells of fresh water (true Aquatics), smells of salt water (Oceanics to use your suggestion), smells of things associated with the sea (Marines, including things like seaweed, Ambergris, driftwood etc), and things which are Vaporous and Gaseous would be useful.

I don't really get a seaweed note in Kenzo Homme which I suppose is why I think of it as a woody floral.

The only ozonic scent I think I have is Bazaar, though I know there are others. I agree it's not an aquatic.
Petrichor I've never heard of till this minute, and I've now learned a new word for the day.

The problem with referring everything other than ocean as "marine" is that if one thinks or discusses a marine environment, the ocean is pretty much automatically a part of it (since "marine" means related to, or produced by the sea).

Regards,
Renato
post #34 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato View Post

The only ozonic scent I think I have is Bazaar, though I know there are others. I agree it's not an aquatic.
Petrichor I've never heard of till this minute, and I've now learned a new word for the day.

The problem with referring everything other than ocean as "marine" is that if one thinks or discusses a marine environment, the ocean is pretty much automatically a part of it (since "marine" means related to, or produced by the sea).

Regards,
Renato



Right? And Ambergris, Seaweed, driftwood etc are things which are produced by the sea but which do not actually have any "watery" component in their odours. They are of the sea but not actually aquatic/oceanic, Marine in this instance would be used to refer to things which are associated with the sea but which don't actually smell like salt water.


Mugler Cologne is another fragrance with an Ozonic note in it there are others. Apres l'Ondee (admittedly not a perfume anyone would call aquatic) has a Petrichor note there are others which do end up being lumped under the "aquatic" banner.
post #35 of 44
whatever category bvlgari aqva falls into
post #36 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato View Post

The only ozonic scent I think I have is Bazaar, though I know there are others. I agree it's not an aquatic.
Petrichor I've never heard of till this minute, and I've now learned a new word for the day.

The problem with referring everything other than ocean as "marine" is that if one thinks or discusses a marine environment, the ocean is pretty much automatically a part of it (since "marine" means related to, or produced by the sea).

Regards,
Renato

For me, Carthusia Uomo exemplifies ozonic/marine/oceanic without being aquatic. It's very reminiscent of a wild shoreline, but not a beach with lots of bathers.

Aquatic, to me, usually signifies a reliance on calone, but both aquatics and ozonic/marine/oceanic scents can easily overlap with other fragrance families.
post #37 of 44
In my opinion the Aquatic category isn't represented accurately and gets a bad rap because of it. Fragrances like Sel Marin, Erolfa, Bulgari Aqua, Bulgari Aqua Marine, Hugh Parson's Traditional,and Kenzo Pour Homme are good examples. When I smell these it makes me think of the ocean or things that remind me of the ocean. Quite simply if it doesn't remind you of these things then it has nothing to do with a body of water and shouldn't be label an aquatic. Really a shame that you have to sift through a mountain of S*** to find something worthwhile.
post #38 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilaire View Post

Right? And Ambergris, Seaweed, driftwood etc are things which are produced by the sea but which do not actually have any "watery" component in their odours. They are of the sea but not actually aquatic/oceanic, Marine in this instance would be used to refer to things which are associated with the sea but which don't actually smell like salt water.


Mugler Cologne is another fragrance with an Ozonic note in it there are others. Apres l'Ondee (admittedly not a perfume anyone would call aquatic) has a Petrichor note there are others which do end up being lumped under the "aquatic" banner.

Thanks. I've never seen Apres L'Ondee - I'll keep an eye out for it next time I go to Europe.
I haven't noticed it in Muglers Cologne, I'll have to check it again.
Regards,
Renato

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indaco View Post

For me, Carthusia Uomo exemplifies ozonic/marine/oceanic without being aquatic. It's very reminiscent of a wild shoreline, but not a beach with lots of bathers.

Aquatic, to me, usually signifies a reliance on calone, but both aquatics and ozonic/marine/oceanic scents can easily overlap with other fragrance families.

Thanks. I'm pretty sure I tested it years ago - but I could be wrong. I'll just have to check it out on my next trip to Italy - the "home" town we stay at has a population of 32,000 people and has several stores selling niche, and one that sells just about every niche scent I ever heard of. .
Regards,
Renato
post #39 of 44
Thread Starter 
I don't know what to make of all of this. It think I agree with SmellsLike and Bigsley that there is so much overlap between groups and notes and differences in perception that very fine distinctions, although valid, may be difficult to pin down/agree on. Indeed, it seems clearer to me now that the whole taxonomy of fragrance groups is debatable, although this is not very satisfactory.
post #40 of 44
Great and apparently necessary thread! For me aquatics have always been and will always be attached to Calone or similar molecules. Just remember the 80s when all these shower gels came out with their "fresh" and "cooling" vibes (apart from volatile oils)... - that's aquatic for me!
The epitome of a marine scent for me is Bvlgari's Aqva - yes, it's not an aquatic at all, it's a marine scent smelling like sea water and algae. For me this simple distinction is very necessary - smell Calone just one time and you'll be able to differentiate for your whole life.
post #41 of 44
Nautica Voyage - Cucumber Aquatic
Aqua Marine - Fishy Aquatic
Hugh Parsons - Sharp Aquatic
Chrome - Bland Aquatic

Aqua, Cool Water & Kenzo, marine?
post #42 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by LloydLlewellyn View Post

I would boil it down to aquatic = fresh synthetic, while marine = salty or seaweed-y.

This.

Btw, like your sig, you smell like dinner, lol. haha.
post #43 of 44
The best exemples IMO are Kenzo PH (oceanic) and L'Eau Par Kenzo (aquatic).
post #44 of 44
Quote:
Cool Water - Aquatic

I just tried Cool Water for the first time today, and I'm coming to an interesting conclusion - when a fragrance contains enough of that aquatic note (calone?), I can't smell anything else in it.

The Cool Water today smelled exactly the same as my Arko Aqua aftershave (which cost £4 for 200ml), only stronger - and it was quite unpleasant. I've sniffed a few other aquatics too, and they all smell the same to me.

I find the note pleasantly refreshing in an aftershave when it's not too strong, and I don't want it to hang around too long - but at EdT concentrations, it makes me feel quite ill.

I must find something oceanic to try.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: MFD Archive
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Male Fragrance Discussion › MFD Archive › Marine/oceanic vs Aquatic??