Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Fragrance Industry and General Fragrance Discussion › Fragrance names that should, but never will, be made
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Fragrance names that should, but never will, be made

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
Just thinking there are some names that will never see the light of day but would be fun if they did

Gucci Gucci Goo, for L'enfant terrible in all of us
Guerlain Meets Boy, an androgynous unisex formulation
Dior Diorama Queen, a Diorama flanker
Thierry Mugler C*Men, a spunky new fragrance
YSL Y Not, a flanker for Y
Tom Ford Crown Victoria, a big taxi of a fragrance
Diptyque Eau Mygod
Chanel Remote Changer
Etro Retro

And many more...any suggestions?
post #2 of 7
Thierry Mugler C*Men - I wouldn't count out this possibility.
post #3 of 7
Ysl m8
post #4 of 7
VanilllaVetiverOudIntense Concentrate. Not that would be one strong frag.
post #5 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by hednic View Post

Thierry Mugler C*Men - I wouldn't count out this possibility.

And G-Men ~ to enhance the inner federal agent in us.

MmmMen - for those who just love men.
post #6 of 7
Thread Starter 
YSL M 16 ...an automatic lady-killer...
post #7 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by docluv45 View Post

Gucci Gucci Goo
Tom Ford Crown Victoria

Ha!

How about Dolce & Gabbana Bing, Gabbana Boom -- Ayyy! Forget about it! It's unbelievable!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Basenotes › Basenotes Forums › Fragrance Discussion › Fragrance Industry and General Fragrance Discussion › Fragrance names that should, but never will, be made