New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sweet gourmand

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Looking to add a sweet fragrance to my collection. I think I'm leaning towards rochas man, and Lolita lempicka's au masculine. Any suggestions based off these two. Anything bad about these? Which one is better?
post #2 of 10
Either one would be fine IMO.
post #3 of 10
I would go for Rochas Man.
post #4 of 10
rochas man is not a pure gourmand. it has some woody notes and some leafy notes in it too. and it has this repulsive synthetic lavendar note.

it's alright, but new haarlem is 10 times better. worth the price.

i hear au masculin is like body kouros. and i'd prefer body kouros over rochas man EASILY

- - - Updated - - -

rochas man is not a pure gourmand. it has some woody notes and some leafy notes in it too. and it has this repulsive synthetic lavendar note.

it's alright, but new haarlem is 10 times better. worth the price.

i hear au masculin is like body kouros. and i'd prefer body kouros over rochas man EASILY
post #5 of 10
What about

Maison des Reves - 'Gourmandise' - Eau de Parfum

Its lovely.
post #6 of 10
What about

Maison des Reves - 'Gourmandise' - Eau de Parfum

It's lovely.
post #7 of 10
What about

Maison des Reves - 'Gourmandise' - Eau de Parfum

It's lovely.
post #8 of 10
Both of your choices are ones I enjoy. I'd pick the LLaM over RM if I had to pick just one, or choose one first.
post #9 of 10
LLAM would be my choice.
post #10 of 10
Since we're on the subject of Maurice Roucel (Rochas Man, New Haarlem), why not try Musc Ravageur? It's a form of heaven on earth...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Male Fragrance Discussion