Hi gang,
I did an intense testing session with about 50 different fragrances (see first picture), measuring longevity on paper, and the results are simply (at least for me) astonishing.

the two top-longevity perfumes are the Balenciaga ones , namely:
-Balenciaga pour Homme (year 1990) , and
-Cristobal pour Homme (year 2000)
both discontinued.

with a longevity of about 21 days
You read correctly: after 20 days ( 3 weeks!) on paper, the Balenciaga scents still smell in a recognizable way.
I have literally no words in my mouth: this is far superior than vintage YSL Kouros , Yves Saint Laurent M7, Thierry Mugler's A*Men (all with about 14-days-longevity on paper) , usually considered the top-longevity benchmarks.
Balenciaga perfumes simply outlasted all others. Since the longevity is one of quality parameters, I wonder if these scents were produced with really top-notch standards.
Maybe underrated?
Or, maybe, no one fully understood and appreciated the quality behind.
I did an intense testing session with about 50 different fragrances (see first picture), measuring longevity on paper, and the results are simply (at least for me) astonishing.

the two top-longevity perfumes are the Balenciaga ones , namely:
-Balenciaga pour Homme (year 1990) , and
-Cristobal pour Homme (year 2000)
both discontinued.

with a longevity of about 21 days
You read correctly: after 20 days ( 3 weeks!) on paper, the Balenciaga scents still smell in a recognizable way.
I have literally no words in my mouth: this is far superior than vintage YSL Kouros , Yves Saint Laurent M7, Thierry Mugler's A*Men (all with about 14-days-longevity on paper) , usually considered the top-longevity benchmarks.
Balenciaga perfumes simply outlasted all others. Since the longevity is one of quality parameters, I wonder if these scents were produced with really top-notch standards.
Maybe underrated?
Or, maybe, no one fully understood and appreciated the quality behind.












